* A New Reader Who is "Confused" *
- J.A.I.L. News Journal
Los Angeles, California February 10, 2007______________________________________________________The Battle Lines Drawn: J.A.I.L. versus The Foreign PowerA Power Foreign to our ConstitutionA New Reader Who is "Confused"A new reader writes to us saying she is confused about what I am writing about (basically the South Dakota fiasco). She can't understand why I "seem" to be upset! Please read what she writes (the portion to which she comments), followed by my response to her. I believe this will be helpful to other new readers. -BarbieFrom: UNIR1Lynn@... [mailto:UNIR1Lynn@...]
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 2:03 PM
Subject: re: What Did the "Show-Election" in South Dakota REALLY Show? * * *
______________________________________________________The Inherent Right of ALL People to Alter or Reform Government.The Right Upon Which All Other Rights Depend
What Did the "Show-Election"inSouth Dakota REALLY Show?It showed that we are being run by a Foreign Power!By Barbie, National J.A.I.L., victoryusa@...
We won't be reformed! (The reader writes): Who is we? You use it in two different ways here. If you are talking as if the state is saying this, it should be in quotes AFTER you give us some background.
We don't care what the South Dakota Constitution says.
We don't care what South Dakota statute says.
We don't care what the Declaration of Independence says.
We don't care what theU.S. Constitution says. (The reader writes): Barbie: I don't think you mean this. You should say, We, the Government of South Dakota or something - don't care about these two foundational documents, small wonder we have a judiciary, legislative & administration that currently function as if we are not a government based on the rule of law and we don't have a Constitution that is the fundamental agreement between the people and those that represent them. Also, I can't understand by reading this article what you are talking about, what the "Show Election" was and what you are fighting against. It would have been useful to simply state what the election was, what the results were and what you are screaming (using HUGE LETTERS) about. You seem so upset that not only did you get your statistics about the election results backwards but what it means & what you would like us to do about it are unclear. Always start with a simple, unemotional background explanation of what you are talking about. And then make your point.
You say The Inherent Right of ALL People to Alter or Reform Government. The Right Upon Which All Other Rights Depend and then you say
There's no need for judicial reform in South Dakota. Then what is the problem? For a new reader on this issue, this is totally confusing.
We like it just the way it is, and it'll stay that way. And we'll hold a Show-Election to prove it! What is that?There's no need for judicial reform in South Dakota .We like it just the way it is, and it'll stay that way.And we'll hold a Show-Election to prove it!
That is the message the State of South Dakota has put out to its People and to the world-- (The reader comments): [when & where did they do that?] it will NOT be reformed! As John Locke said in his second treatise "Of the Dissolution of Government," To tell people they may provide for themselves, by erecting a new legislative, when by oppression, artifice, or being delivered over to a foreign power... we must ask ourselves, "Have we been delivered over to a foreign power?"
What is a "foreign power"? The Founding Authority for our country establishes the origin of legitimate power for government as "...governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,..." (Declaration of Independence 1776).
Those powers are specified in the 1787 Constitution, written on behalf of "We the people of the United States ..." (i.e., the governed), which Constitution establishes that it is the Supreme Law of the Land (Article VI, ¶2) stating in part, "...and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, any thing in the Constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding." The State of South Dakota acknowledges this fact in its own State Constitution, to wit: "... And the state of South Dakota is an inseparable part of the American Union and the Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land." South Dakota cannot stand as an isolated island, independent of the other 49 states. All other states have an interest in what happens in South Dakota .
What if the power in South Dakota , purporting to be "the state of South Dakota ," disregards the Supreme Law of the Land, and proceeds against the governed as it did with the Show-Election in November? See "Show-Election" in South Dakota 2006. ( First, an apology for a mistake I made in that JNJ, second paragraph from
the end, where I erroneously stated: There is not an ounce of credibility in the reported outcome of 89% in favor of the Amendment, and 11% against it. You can see the obvious mistake- I had it reversed! It should have been "89% against the Amendment, and 11% in favor of it.")
(The reader finally comments): Please be careful in what you write. Readers don't have your history with the issue & this is just confusing.
(This is her last comment - Barbie)
Barbie's response:Dear Reader:Who is we? As used in the introduction of that JNJ, it refers to the power in control of South Dakota during the Show-Election on November 7th. That power is a Foreign Power which is shown by its conduct. Only a foreign power could have pulled off what was done in SD throughout the anti-J.A.I.L. campaign. The entire fiasco consisted of lies upon lies-- not an ounce of truth was stated. The FP kept the People in ignorance of the truth by perpetuating the Lie, plus it failed to provide the voters with a Voters' Guide in which all issues would be set forth with arguments pro and con, with rebuttals, plus the entire text of each measure for the People to read for themselves to be INFORMED voters.That's what's important in this country-- the right to vote is the voice of the People, and for that voice to be meaningful, it has to be an intelligent and informed voice. When voters are kept uninformed of the issues and both sides of arguments, the election becomes a sham. It is the responsibility of the state to send out information to all registered voters, informing them of the issues on which they are to vote. In California, we have a generous "Official Voter Information Guide" 192 pages, with ample issue information so that the voters are INFORMED when they go to the polls. That's part of the Right to Vote-- to be INFORMED of what they're voting on.The fact that the state in South Dakota didn't inform the voters of the issues, i.e., mail them a Voters' Guide like other states do, shows that by such conduct in keeping the voters UNINFORMED, it was a foreign power at the helm-- not a government. A foreign power is not bound by the Constitution, nor by any law-- only by its own edicts. It is entirely administrative in nature, no separation of powers, no checks and balances, no "branches" of power. They're all in the same canoe.We have reported extensively on the numerous criminal acts that were perpetrated by this foreign power, acting under color of government, and they have not denied any of it. As long as the People of South Dakota do nothing about it, the FP in that jurisdiction will continue to have free reign. It's up to the People to throw off such counterfeit power in whatever way they can. The best way we know of is by J.A.I.L. But that right has been disregarded by the renegade FP in charge in South Dakota.So we have given plenty of background about this Foreign Power. See www.sd-jail4judges.org for all the information and evidence you could want to show what we're talking about. No, I wasn't quoting the state-- I was making statements based on their conduct and the evidence we have about it.How can I say "We, the government of South Dakota..." when there is no government? As I said, it's a renegade power that does not perform the role of government. It does not act in the interests of the People, to respect and protect their rights. The entire Legislature wrote a resolution AGAINST a People's measure-- that's against South Dakota law, as we've shown on the website I referred to above. This was all done at public facilities, using public staff and equipment, and on the public payroll. The People paid for this renegade group to write a resolution AGAINST their interests! This renegade group knew it was aganst the law, but they didn't care!I explained what a "show-election" was in my previous JNJ "Show-Election" in South Dakota 2006 http://www.jail4judges.org/JNJ_Library/2007/2007-01-07.html. I said:What was really conducted by the State of South Dakota last November was a "Show-Election," described as an extreme example of electoral fraud where an election is held purely for show. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Show_election. The only purpose of the show-election was to defeat J.A.I.L. (Amendment E); and it was carried out by nefarious means in violation of state law. "The 'results' of a show-election are frequently one-sided to the point of absurdity, with leaders claiming mandates of 90 percent or higher; this rarely occurs in a free democratic election."Read the entire article to get the full flavor of what I'm describing.Yes, I acknowledged my mistake and apologized for it: ( First, an apology for a mistake I made in that JNJ, second paragraph from the end, where I erroneously stated: There is not an ounce of credibility in the reported outcome of 89% in favor of the Amendment, and 11% against it. You can see the obvious mistake- I had it reversed! It should have been "89% against the Amendment, and 11% in favor of it.")I don't claim to be perfect, but when I make a mistake, I acknowledge it and correct it, which I did.Yes, not only do I "seem" upset, I AM upset by the fiasco that took place in South Dakota-- with good reason as we have been reporting throughout the campaign and shown on the South Dakota website. Anyone who loves this country and its Constitution, and the Declaration of Independence that founded this country, and see how it is absolutely mangled by an all-powerful unbridled force, paid at taxpayers' expense, SHOULD be upset! It's high time all People become upset at what's happening in this country, and why it's happening. The Foreign Power is sustained on "good people doing nothing" --on an apathetic People, too ignorant to even be upset, by and large. Some of us are upset-- but NOT ENOUGH! Yes, capital letters!What you were reading below isn't the "start" of the matter. To the contrary, it's the build-up over more than a year of propaganda to the People of South Dakota, of committing crimes against the People of South Dakota, and the People, as a society,not knowing what to do. This fiasco affects the entire nation! So, it's not a matter of "starting" with a simple unemotional background at that point. Apparently you aren't aware of what we've been reporting for months! -- well over a year.Now keep statements in context. "I" didn't say there's no need for judicial reform in South Dakota. That was part of the introductory statements made in italics, mimicking what the Foreign Power in South Dakota said by their actions. You've heard "Action speaks louder than words"? The fact that those several statements were at the beginning of the text of the article, and appeared indented and in enlarged italics, should have shown that this was referring to the power in South Dakota. The following is my first paragraph, explaining those words:
"That is the message the State of South Dakota has put out to its People and to the world-- it will NOT be reformed! As John Locke said in his second treatise 'Of the Dissolution of Government,' To tell people they may provide for themselves, by erecting a new legislative, when by oppression, artifice, or being delivered over to a foreign power... we must ask ourselves, "Have we been delivered over to a foreign power?' "Those introductory words before the text of the article is the message, not by speech, but by actions of what purports to be the State of South Dakota.You say you're a new reader. Then you have a lot to learn. First take a look at the website for some background of what happened these past two years in South Dakota regarding J.A.I.L. That'll clue you in quite a bit. As I said, I explained "Show-Election" in my previous news journal, referenced above. Read the whole thing to gain more insight. If you have further questions after reading that and viewing the South Dakota website, let me know.Another thing I highly recommend you do is go to our JNJ Library on our national site, at www.jail4judges.org and click on J.A.I.L. News Journals in the left-hand column, then click on the year 2006 (even back in 2005), and see the list of journals we have that report on the South Dakota fiasco. Read as many as you can for an abundant history of what took place.Please be careful in what you write. Readers don't have your history with the issue & this is just confusing.Oh yes, dear Reader, I am quite careful in what I write. I back everything up with a lot of references from my research on any reported subject. This is not just stuff flowing from my fingers on the keyboard. It is based on authority and evidence which I cite quite often. You should have noticed that when you read the JNJ you're critiquing below.I believe that most readers, if they are unfamiliar with what they read in our news journals, and don't receive enough knowledge from the references cited, will go to our website, shown at the signature at the end of each journal to garner information and background about this cause. South Dakota is a hot-button issue for us at this time, which is why that website is linked right at the top of our Home Page, www.sd-jail4judges.org. That's where the wealth of information and evidence about SD is located. And then, of course, go to the J.A.I.L. News Journal Library. There's enough information there to fill you with abundant knowledge and reasons for what we report.So, Reader, there's really no excuse for being "confused" and "don't have [our] history" if you didn't look anything up about it. IF, after looking it up, you STILL don't understand something, THEN let us know and we'll be glad to help you if we can. A lot of questions and remarks you made were answered, had you read through the article and gone to the cited references and web links.Sorry you were confused. We hope that you will become enlightened after reading our background of material on our website. You can print out articles in which you might be particularly interested. I encourage you to do so.Thank you for writing and let us know if we can clarify anything else for you.-Barbie
J.A.I.L.- Judicial Accountability Initiative Law - www.jail4judges. orgOur South Dakota site: www.SD-JAIL4Judges. orgContribute to J.A.I.L. at P.O. Box 207, N. Hollywood, CA 91603See our active flash, http://www.jail4jud ges.org/national _001.htm
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of gov't. heretofore unrealized.JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!E-Group sign on at http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/jail4judge s/join
Get involved at JAIL_SALE_USA- subscribe@ yahoogroups. comTo be added or removed, write to VictoryUSA@jail4jud ges.orgHe has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation. - Declaration of Independence
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root." -- Henry David Thoreau
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.32/677 - Release Date: 2/8/2007 9:04 PM