The Right of Appeal - By Ron Branson
- The Right of Appeal(By Ron Branson - 8/30/06)"I'll tell you one or many, many problems with J.A.I.L. That is the lack of a right of appeal."Having searched the internet for observations re: J.A.I.L., I find assertions made by those claiming to be an authority upon the provisions of J.A.I.L., when they are actually clueless. Above is one of those assertions, to wit, that J.A.I.L. fails to allow for a right of appeal. So let us test this assertion for accuracy.The answer to this concern is prescribed clearly within Amendment E itself for those who both to read it before opening their mouth. Paragraph 11 set for in appropriate part, "...no complaint of misconduct shall be considered by the Special Grand Jury unless the complainant shall have first attempted to exhaust all judicial remedies available in this State..." The basic requirement of J.A.I.L. is that all appeals must be exhausted to the Supreme Court first. If the appeal process functions as it is prescribed by law, then tried and appeals issues completely avert the involvement of J.A.I.L. totally.The only issues that can possible be brought before the Special Grand Jury are the violation issues previously appealed and ruled upon by the courts. Should the Supreme Court refuse to rule upon the violation issue, then it may pass on to the Special Grand Jury.The claim that J.A.I.L. provides for no appeals process is spurious. One would think that perhaps the arguer of this position believe their must be a second appeal process of the very same issues before the very same judges. This argument, of course, is clearly condemned by the courts as "being given a second bite at the apple." No one is allowed a second appeal on the very same issues, and particularly in front of the same judges. All litigation must end somewhere. If we were to justify a second appeal, how about a third appeal, or a fourth appeal?Further, anyone who can read, can also read paragraph 4, "...a special prosecutor may be retained to prosecute ongoing cases in which they are involved through all appeals and any complaints to the Special Grand Jury." Should a trial commence against a defendant judge, and he loses in the trial, he may wish to appeal the decision to the upper courts, including to the U.S. Supreme Court. In such cases, the special prosecutor may be retained to represent the prosecution's position to the Supreme Court. Again, only after all appeals are exhausted can a complaint be lodged with the Special Grand Jury.Within J.A.I.L. there can exist no such thing as an unappealed or an unappealable ruling. The very pursuit of J.A.I.L. is to assure that everyone receives justice by getting their day in court, and all due process afforded them under law.So we can all now clearly see that those who argue that the problem with J.A.I.L. is that it provides for no right of appeal is proffered by those who have no understanding of what they are talking about. This is but just one of many points others misstate or pervert about the truth of J.A.I.L.There seems to be no end of the dreamed-up "problems" with J.A.I.L., and you may rest assured that every supposed "problem" is answerable, and that more than 95% of what is stated by the opponents are based upon lies and misstatements.-Ron Branson
J.A.I.L.- Judicial Accountability Initiative Law - www.jail4judges.org
Contribute to J.A.I.L. at P.O. Box 207, N. Hollywood, CA 91603
See our active flash, http://www.jail4judges.org/national_001.htm
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of gov't. heretofore unrealized.
JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!
E-Group sign on at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join
Get involved at JAIL_SALE_USAemail@example.com
To be added or removed, write to VictoryUSA@...
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless
minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is
striking at the root." -- Henry David Thoreau <><