March 25, 2006
Inherent Right of All People to Alter or Reform Abusive
The Right Upon Which All Other Rights
"Who stands to be hurt if Amendment E is
Would it be the South
Dakota Bar Association and lawyers? NO!Would it be the South Dakota
Would it be the insurance
companies and agencies? NO!
IT WOULD BE THE VOTERS OF SOUTH DAKOTA
WOULD BE HURT.
How Bad Is
Unlike ten years ago, we are now hearing a
lot about the subject of judicial immunity, i.e., judges
being above the law and unaccountable no matter what. The word is
getting around that you simply cannot sue a judge no matter how evil or
corrupt may be the plot and conspiracy against you.
What this J.A.I.L. News Journal seeks
to explore is whether the actions of a judge can ever go
beyond the mark, that is, to be so egregious and outrageous so as to shock
the conscience of the common people in which such conduct
cannot qualify for judicial immunity.
Suppose your were wrongfully convicted by a judge
and denied the inalienable right to counsel and to defend yourself
before a jury in order to out carry out a planned and
concerted conspiracy conjured up between your judge and your
prosecutor, in which you were sentenced and thrown in jail for eighteen
months, and in which the appellate court agreed with the falsity of your
conviction in which your conviction was reversed and you
were sent back to the evil judge that convicted you, where
all charges against you are dismissed.
The question is, does such a willful and
egregious conduct qualify you for damages from the judge who damaged
you despite the doctrine of judicial immunity? The answer is --
No! The judge is still entitled to the protection of judicial immunity,
and you are to receive absolutely nothing for the conspiracy,
false conviction and unjust imprisonment.
Can we not rather endure the brutal
beatings of an out-and-out violent criminal more so than that of
the actions of such a miscreant judge. With the criminal, at
least one might have a chance at successfully suing the
criminal for wrong doing, but certainly not
a judge. God forbid that we have now come so low in our
justice system that a rape, robbery, and extended
kidnapping would be chosen rather than face the injustice of a
judge. This is the point to which we have come in our "justice system,"
folks. Now arises JAIL4Judges as the only remedy in such cases
to overcome the unlimited abuses that are afflicted by rogue and
criminal judges that are covered by judicial immunity.
This is why Amendment E on the ballot in South
Dakota this November is so very critical. It is time we call corrupt and
evil judges covered by judicial immunity no matter what, to account this
year, starting with S.D.
WHO PAYS?! When a person is denied counsel, unlawfully convicted
and falsely imprisoned for 18 months
Auburn, CA 95602
March 24, 2006
Plumas County, California Judges
Olney, Kaufman and Pangman conspired with county Prosecutors Cunan and
McGowan to wrongfully convict and imprison Joseph Robinson through
knowing, willing and malicious violation of his right to counsel and
his right to present a defense to the jury while California allowed them
to do it and then condoned it.
On July 31, 2001, Cunan and Olney
wrongfully convicted and then falsely imprisoned Robinson for 567 days
before the California State Prison paroled him. Thirty days later, the
California Third District Court of Appeal reversed Robinsons conviction
because the aforementioned individuals violated his right to counsel. When
his case was remitted back to the Plumas County Court for a fair trial,
Cunan and Olney dismissed all charges against Robinson.
Robinson sued the aforementioned individuals and California for monetary
damages, they all claimed immunity and United States District Court Judge
Burrell ruled that they were all immune from civil liability and ordered
the suit to be dismissed.
Robinsons appeal in the Ninth Circuit
requests that court to resolve the following issues:
1. Do people who have been unlawfully convicted and falsely
imprisoned have the right to a civil remedy? If no, why not? If yes, who
2. Are judges and prosecutors in a court with subject matter
jurisdiction immune from civil liability under all circumstances no matter
how outrageous their conduct, without exception?
3. Are the following circumstances narrow enough to constitute an
exception to judicial and prosecutorial immunity pursuant to this Courts
conclusion in Ashelman v. Pope that the exceptions to immunity must be
Allegation of judicial/prosecutorial conspiracy to wrongfully
convict and imprison a defendant through intentional violation of his
right to counsel
Appellate court reversal of the conviction for the violation of
right to counsel
Subsequent acquittal or dismissal with prejudice of all
4. If not, how narrow does an exception to judicial immunity have
5. Is the state liable under the foregoing circumstances?
The essential question here is: Who Pays? When state judges and
prosecutors violate the right to counsel to unlawfully convict and falsely
imprison an individual for 18 months and then dismiss all of the charges
when the case is reversed upon appeal and remitted back for a fair trial,
who pays, the state the judges and prosecutors, or the individual who was
wrongfully convicted and imprisoned? ....
23720 Maple Ct.
Auburn, CA 95602
Fax : 530-268-0400
Vote YES on
Amendment E for your future and your own