Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

What a Message the People of S.D. could send this year

Expand Messages
  • victoryusa@jail4judges.org
    ... From: Flaming Fury To: VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 10:54 AM Subject: Re: * * * And, Ponder These Questions - Daily * * *
    Message 1 of 1 , Feb 5, 2006
    • 0 Attachment
       
      ----- Original Message -----
      Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 10:54 AM
      Subject: Re: * * * And, Ponder These Questions - Daily * * *

      What a message the People of
      South Dakota could send this year:
       
       
      1)  Vote YES on the Judicial Accountability Initiative in November, and
       
      2)  Vote NO on each and every legislator who subscribed to this resolution!!!!
       
      Would THAT ever have politicians (including the judicial ones) quaking!
       
      Susan Kennedy
      California JAILer
       
       
      House Cleaning Time!  -Ron
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
       
      ----- Original Message -----
      Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 10:15 PM
      Subject: * * * And, Ponder These Questions - Daily * * *

      J.A.I.L. News Journal
      ______________________________________________________
      Los Angeles, California                                        February 3, 2006
      ______________________________________________________
      The Inherent Right of ALL People to Alter or Reform Abusive Government.
      The Right Upon Which All Other Rights Depend
      The Torchbearer for J.A.I.L. Nationally - Support Them!
      P.O. Box 412, Tea, S.D. 57064  -  (605) 231-1418
       
      And, Ponder These Questions - Daily
       
      As preface to facts below set forth in a question format, J.A.I.L. has been informed that this week, Wednesday, February 1, 2006, the Legislature of South Dakota has officially banned together in unison to pass, as legislators, a resolution to oppose the South Dakota Judicial Accountability measure appearing on the people's ballot November 7, 2006. In light of that fact, consider the below constitutional provisions.
       
       
      Does the South Dakota Constitution acknowledge that
      all political power is inherent in the people?
      Article VI §26
       
      Does the South Dakota Constitution acknowledge that
      all free government is founded on the
      authority of the people?
      Article VI §26
       
      Does the South Dakota Constitution acknowledge that
      government is instituted for the
      equal protection and benefit of the people?
      Article VI §26
       
      Does the South Dakota Constitution acknowledge that
      the people have the right in lawful and constituted methods to alter or reform their forms of government in such manner
      as they may think proper?
      Article VI §26
       
      Does the South Dakota Constitution
      provide that
      members of the Legislature shall take and subscribe an oath or affirmation to support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the state of South Dakota?
      Article III §8
       
      Pursuant to Article III §8 of the
       South Dakota Constitution,
      are all members of the Legislature obligated under their oath
      to support the right of the people
      in lawful and constituted methods
      to alter or reform their forms of government
      in such manner as they may think proper,
      as set forth in Article VI §26 of said Constitution?
      Article III §8; Article VI §26
       
      Pursuant to Article III §8 and Article VI §26 of the South Dakota Constitution
      does the Legislature of the state of South Dakota have the lawful official authority
      to OPPOSE the right of the people
      in lawful and constituted methods
      to alter or reform the Judicial Department
      of government pursuant to the people's
      Amendment E to said Constitution?
      Article III §8; Article VI §26
       
      Pursuant to the third and fourth paragraphs of Article III §8 of the South Dakota Constitution,
      is any member or officer of the Legislature
      who shall refuse to take the oath or
      who shall be convicted of having sworn falsely to, or violated his said oath, subject to forfeiture of his office and disqualification thereafter from holding the office?
      Article III §8 (3rd & 4th parag.)
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
       
          All political power is inherent in the people, and all free government is founded on their authority, and is instituted for their equal protection and benefit, and they have the right in lawful and constituted methods to alter or reform their forms of government in such manner as they may think proper. And the state of South Dakota is an inseparable part of the American Union and the Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land.
      South Dakota Constitution, Article VI §26
       
          Members of the Legislature and officers thereof, before they enter upon their official duties, shall take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation: I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the state of South Dakota, and will faithfully discharge the duties of (senator, representative or officer) according to the best of my abilities, ...
          ...
          Any member or officer of the legislature who shall refuse to take the oath herein prescribed shall forfeit his office.
          Any member or officer of the Legislature who shall be convicted of having sworn falsely to, or violated his said oath, shall forfeit his office and be disqualified thereafter from holding the office of senator or member of the house of representatives or any office within the gift of the Legislature.
      South Dakota Constitution, Article III §8 (pertinent portion)
       
       
      We ask, what has happened to the separation of powers doctrine? Where is the representation of the People of South Dakota?
      Have these legislators not officially banned together in a scandal and conspiracy to do despite to their offices of public trust, and officially despised their oaths of office, making themselves subject to constitutional forfeiture of their offices?
       
      Amendment E on the South Dakota ballot this November shall not only prove quite interesting, but also historical.
       


      J.A.I.L.- Judicial Accountability Initiative Law - www.jail4judges.org
      Contribute to J.A.I.L. at P.O. Box 207, N. Hollywood, CA 91603
      See our active flash, http://www.jail4judges.org/national_001.htm
      JAIL is a unique addition to our form of gov't. heretofore unrealized.
      JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!
      E-Group sign on at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join
      Get involved at JAIL_SALE_USA-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
      To be added or removed, write to VictoryUSA@...
      Your help is needed: www.SouthDakotaJudicialAccountability.com
       
      "..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless
      minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams
       
      "There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is
      striking at the root."                         -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.