Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Public Schools Turn To Thought Control

Expand Messages
  • jail4judges
    NewsHawk® Inc. http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a392ac5687b4f.htm With No Obligation to Educate, Schools Turn to Thought Control By Linda Gorman In case you
    Message 1 of 1 , Jul 10, 2000
    • 0 Attachment

      NewsHawk® Inc.

      With No Obligation to Educate, Schools Turn to Thought Control

      By Linda Gorman

          In case you were ever in doubt, the Colorado Court of Appeals has just made it official. Colorado public schools have no legally enforceable obligation to educate children. According to the court, parents and students cannot sue school districts because they "are not private students enrolled in a private vocational school but, instead, consist of the general public. They have not individually bargained with the
      school district, nor individually paid for specific educational
      services. As a result, they cannot assert legal claims for the alleged failure to provide those unbargained-for services."[1]
          The Court found that "the contention that the quality of education provided by the school district is inadequate--is not a matter to be properly resolved by the courts." Had various courts not already found legal excuses for taking control of almost every other aspect of school operations, its restraint would be refreshing.
          In other words, the state may require that children attend school and that everyone pay school taxes. In return, citizens get to vote for one of the slates of school board candidates offered by the teacher's union.
          Though government entities are free to compel people to pay for lousy services over which they have little control, private entities are not. Private vocational schools failing to offer promised classes or hours of instruction can be sued.
          Having mastered the art of pretending to educate those required to attend it and having been freed of any responsibility to do otherwise, the Denver Public School System (DPS) is apparently planning to expand into pretending to provide mental, medical, and behavioral health services. To this end, the Center for Human Investment Policy at the University of Colorado Denver was "asked to develop a health/behavioral
      health needs assessment survey to gather broader input" to determine if "principals, nurses, psychologists, social workers, teachers and parents are in agreement about these issues."[2]
          Judging from the loaded questions, DPS officials want the power to pass judgment on the physical, mental, emotional, and social health of individual children and to treat those problems as they see fit.
          "What level of health and behavioral health care do you believe your school should provide?" asks question number 7. In addition to "Don't know," one may pick Basic Care, which includes referral for assessment and treatment, Intermediate Care, which adds counseling and care for chronic health problems, or Full Care which includes treatment for general medical and mental health problems and referral to specialists.
      There is no space for telling DPS elites to stay out of health care delivery until they have mastered the art of delivering reading, writing, and arithmetic.
          Note also that mental health and behavioral problems are lumped with medical ones despite the fact that medicine has a scientific basis and most mental and behavioral "health" assessments consist of little more than someone's opinion. The potential for abuse, for drugging the rebels and brainwashing those who disagree, is huge and already beginning to be  realized.
          According to Jon E. Dougherty writing in WorldNetDaily, Derek Loutzenheiser, a 12-year-old student with an exemplary record in Holland, Michigan, was labeled a potential violence risk when he suggested, in a Social Studies class discussion, that one way to prevent school shootings would be to arm instructors. School officials told his parents that they would not have to involve Social Services if Derek was separated from other students and forced to enter the school's "Mentor"
      program so that an adult supervisor could monitor his thought
      processes.[3] Recall that Social Service bureaucrats have the power to declare parents guilty of child abuse until proven innocent, and to take their child from them until parents prove their innocence.
          School officials noted that Derek had violated the school's policy of non-violence by fighting back when attacked by three older students and had often spoken favorably about the First and Second Amendments. His parents noted that Derek had refused to sign a "Red Letter" vow of peace written by the principal that asked students to take a oath to turn in their friends for suspicious activity and to never defend themselves if attacked.
          In short, Derek had refused to parrot the party line and was judged behaviorally unhealthy. The Soviets pioneered this model by declaring those who disagreed with the government mentally aberrant and imprisoning them in mental institutions until their thinking could be adjusted by psychological conditioning or drugs. As DPS puts it, "schools are where one finds children, so it [sic] is the best place to offer health/ behavioral health services," "children need good health to learn, so health/behavioral health is a valid school concern, and
      "children with health/behavioral health challenges need medical
      attention in schools to reach their potential."[4]
          DPS has a point. Judging from his behavior, Derek has already assimilated the independence and respect for truth characteristic of outstanding Americans. Without medical attention, he never will realize his full potential as a good little citizen in the new world order.

      [[1]]Denver Parents Association et al. v. Denver Board of Education; 98CA1309, Colorado Court of Appeals. February 3, 2000. As posted on the Colorado Bar Association's web site, http://www.cobar.org/coappcts/ca2000/ct02036.htm, on 10 May 2000.

      [2] Denver Public School Health and Behavioral Health Needs Assessment
      Survey. 1 May 2000. The Center for Human Investment Policy, University
      of Colorado, Denver.

      [3] Jon E. Dougherty. 30 March 2000. "Sixth grader targeted for pro-gun
      remarks, 'A' student defends 2nd Amendment, flagged as violence risk."
      as posted on the web on 9 May 2000.
      [4] Denver Public School Health and Behavioral Health Needs Assessment
      Survey. 1 May 2000. The Center for Human Investment Policy, University
      of Colorado, Denver. Questions 15 [2], 15 [4], and 15 [5] all of which
      required an agree or disagree answer. Note that agreeing that schools
      should be concerned about health does not imply that they should deliver it.

      Linda Gorman is a Senior Fellow with the Independence Institute, a free-market think tank in Golden, Colorado, http://i2i.org. This article originally appeared in the Colorado Daily (Boulder), for which Linda Gorman is a regular columnist.

      J.A.I.L.  (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
      Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
      JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
      JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
      Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
      Other egroups may sign on at jail4judges@egroups.com
      JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
      Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
      "..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
      tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
                                                       --Samuel Adams     
      "There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
      who is striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.