Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

1727We Have Met The Enemy, III

Expand Messages
  • Ron Branson
    Sep 25, 2012
    • 0 Attachment

      We Have Met The Enemy, III

      Bill Scheidler, I have watched the presentation presented by Attorney Eleanor Capogrosso which you sent me below at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJ38bwjpSuA .

      I certainly relate to her frustration. What was going through the minds of those on the senatorial panel was, "Oh, brother, here we have to listen to another one of our disgruntled constituents who does not appreciate our services we are providing them. We have to give up ten minutes of our valuable time appearing to care. We can hardly wait until her time is up so we can say, 'Thank you, Ms. Capogrosso, we will follow up on this.' "

      The problem, Bill, and I speak from experience, she, as well as many of us, is seeking redress from the very ones interested in keeping things just the way they are. One of the last things they want is judicial accountability, because once the judges are accountable, then they will have to be accountable. Hear this. The judges are but the protective alligators swimming around in the mot surrounding their Legislative and Executive Castle. They are in this tyranny all together. No one in any branch of government wants to see accountability brought to bear, for accountability would derail their gravy train for them all and embarrass all those in government. They are in a competitive contest with one another to get the bootee before some other public official feeding at the same troff gets theirs. Consider the city manager of a small town "earning" $800,000 a year to hold the title of city manager.

      What I now state, I state to you all. We have to wake up and realize you are addressing a self-interested body who is does not care about your plight. Their only concern is that hopefully these frustrated People will not rise up and take matters into their own hands and that they loose their cushie job with all its perks and benefits. This is all they are concerned about.

      When will we learn that if there is to come about real change on behalf of the People, it must come directly from the People, and from nowhere else. We must be the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last when it comes to public accountability. We must dictate the specific terms and conditions without consulting them on the wisdom of our ways.

      This is why our Founding Fathers provided within our Constitution a Grand Jury system. However, we gave ear to these self-interest servants, and we let them dictate to us the When, Where, and circumstances in which have access to our Grand Juries. In affect, we allowed them to steal away, "with our permission mind you," our most powerful weapon, the unreviewable 
      independent Grand Jury system. It is the Grand Jury power that must be restored to us at any cost!

      This is precisely what JAIL4Judges will accomplish, nothing more, and nothing less. The problem is, the People are too ignorant to recognize what they have done, must less, how to fix the problem. The "fix" has already been provided for them within JAIL4judges, but the People still are ignorant as to what they have done.

      To accomplish restoring our freedom, the People must exercise our power within the Constitutional Initiative Process as provided us in Article II, Sec. 1 of the California Constitution, "All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for their protection, security, and benefit, and they have the right to alter or reform it when the public good may require." Other states have similar language.

      If I may give the Branson expanded version, it is, "All political power is absolutely inherent in the People exclusively, and in no other. Their public servants, to whom they have lent conditional consent, have only the limited and temporary power granted to them to defend our rights. Notwithstanding this, the People retain the absolute right and power to alter and/or reform everything respecting their future affairs at any time they so choose."

      This directive is also permanently scribed in our Declaration of Independence, to wit; "That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed..."

      Governments have no permanent or enduring power whatsoever. Rather, we retain the power even to dismiss our servants at will. To help you understand what I am saying, I suggest everyone read the homepage of http://www.sd-jail4judges.org.

      Ron Branson

      bill scheidler wrote:
      Ron...  a copy of my post to Bob Grundstein... he is an attorney who is fighting the WA State Bar... here is my reply to him.... please consider the last paragraph.
      Mr. Grundstein, all that you say here I have found to be true through my own experience with the WSBA. And I have learned, by searching the Web, that what happens in WA State is happening all over this country. For example NY... just listen to Eleanor Capogrosso, ESQ., in her testimony before the NY Senate Judiciary Committee BACK in 2009 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJ38bwjpSuA  Nothing, in NY, was done! Why? I can only guess that the "power players"  ...are in firm control of this corrupt system.... and it reaches deep and wide into our judicial, legislative and executive branches. IT IS A PROBLEM OF BEING TOO BIG TO FAIL (to fix).

      Consider this .... as government gets bigger so does it liability insurance. Said another way as government get bigger so will the number of lawsuits filed against the government for which it must defend. Who is on the hook to pay for these lawsuits? Insurance companies, taxpayers. How does government protect its own liability exposure and the coast on taxpayers.... it rigs the system -- likely with the help of insurance companies.

      Your thoughts?

      ----- Original Message -----
      To: Arnie
      Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 11:15 PM
      Subject: We Have Met The Enemy

      We Have Met The Enemy
      by Ron Branson

      Arnie, there are two standards at play here. One is the correct and legal process, and the other is reality, i.e., the way things are. The bottom line is that when there is a conflict between these two wills, People vs. government, it is the will of the People that must prevails This is precisely what JAIL4judges assures when the People decide they want to take actually charge over their future affairs and not just; march on Washington, grandstand, make platitudes and speeches of high-sounding words, sable rattle, have meetings of Meet, Greet, Eat, Retreat, and Repeat, huff and puff to blow their enemies houses down, etc, et al.

      Now, let me talk practical (reality) about your below prescribed "remedy," on the truth of the matter and how it really is. You are correct that the judges and politicians are "bound" by their Oaths of Office, but who is going to enforce it? We would like to think  that it is enforceable by the courts and by the sheriffs. We hope that another judge will recognize our plight and pass down a judgment against the offender of their sacred duty. But we have to face reality.

      I have brought suit against the offender's bonds. So what happened? Reality was, the bondholders was dismissed from the lawsuit on the first court appearance, and that issue was  preserved for later on appeal.

      So everyone believes against reality that the Appellate Court will hear the argument on appeal. But, again, we have to face reality, a hearing for justice on reality is not going to happen.

      Oh sure you can take this petition on up further on appeal, but reality is, they are definitely not interested. Just how do you think we got in this mess anyway in the first place? It was not by the courts, Appellate Courts, and even the U.S. Supreme Court, listening to our petitions.

      From thereon, we can wish for justice until we get frustrated and decide to take matters into our own hands. JAIL4judges came about by this very means, i.e., someone (I think his name was Ron Branson) got frustrated and decided that we have to take matters into our own hands. This man developed a remedy, but what this man, Ron Branson, found out the People were not ready to exercise a remedy. Ron Branson found out that that it was not the judges that was the real problem, but dumb People. This cycle shall continue to go around in circles in frustration seeking a "legal" way out of their dilemma until they ultimately get more frustrated and decide to go to arms.

      This is the reality of where we are now, searching for a remedy that does not involve the principles set forth within JAIL4Judges. So we now have this guy, Ron Branson, sitting by watching People get frustrated in looking for a remedy. This cycle shall continue going around and around without a remedy until the People actually go to arms, not just talk about it, for lack of a remedy. But arms is not really a remedy, but the evidence of the lack of a remedy. But the reality is, we are not without an actual remedy, it is just that the People hope against hope that a revolution will be cheaper, faster, and more successful than the actual remedy proposed by this guy, Ron Branson.

      The following quote is credited to Pogo, "We have met the enemy and he is us." The remedy is, we must defeat this evil enemy spoken of by Pogo who stands in the way of victory. Until we do, we shall be like a jack ass pursuing a carrot dangling from a string, and continue to go around and around and around and ....."

      Ron Branson

      *   *   *