110*** First N.H. Impeachment in 200 Yrs.
- Jul 13, 20007/13/00
New Hampshire HouseImpeaches Chief Justice
By NORMA LOVE
Associated Press Writer
CONCORD, N.H. (AP)The chief justice of the New Hampshire Supreme Court the state's first impeached official in two centuries is looking forward to the chance to defend himself at a Senate trial, his lawyer says.
The House overwhelmingly impeached Chief Justice David Brock on Wednesday. Lawmakers accused him of ethics violations ranging from perjury to letting disqualified justices take part in case discussions. ....
The last New Hampshire official impeached was Supreme Court Justice Woodbury Langdon in 1790, for bad attendance. He resigned before his Senate trial.
Brock, who has been chief justice since 1986, is accused of
improperly calling a lower-court judge about a politically
connected lawsuit; talking to another justice about the handling of that justice's divorce; lying under oath during the investigation; and allowing justices who had been disqualified from hearing certain cases because of conflicts of interest to comment on impending rulings.
.... The investigation has already forced the resignation of one justice and placed two others under a cloud.
GOP Rep. Albert Hamel said the House could restore the high court's moral authority only by voting for impeachment: ``I hope that we have equal fortitude, guts, courage, to do what we have to do in this situation.''
.... In testimony before the House Judiciary Committee last month, Brock apologized for poor judgment but said he meant no harm ....The articles also charge that Brock in February asked for
then-Supreme Court Justice Stephen Thayer's opinion about the appointment of an appeals panel in Thayer's divorce case and later discussed the panel with Thayer privately. Thayer resigned earlier this year to avoid possible criminal prosecution.
Disclosure of Thayer's intervention prompted a group of ex-wives of other New Hampshire judges to threaten a lawsuit in April. The women argued they were unable to get competent lawyers or decent divorce settlements because of their husbands' influence.
Brock's lawyers and other supporters said the Judiciary
Committee lowered the threshold for impeachment too far.
.... On Monday, Brock said that he would consider resigning if he could do so with dignity, and only if the House did not adopt the article of impeachment accusing him of lying. If he resigns now, before he turns 65, he will get no pension, unless the Legislature changes the law. The House voted Wednesday against doing that.
Earlier in the investigation, Justices Sherman Horton and John Broderick were accused of ethics violations for not immediately blowing the whistle on Thayer. But the Judiciary Committee deciding against impeaching or reprimanding the two justices, saying months of publicity had damaged their reputations enough. ....
J.A.I.L. (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
Other egroups may sign on at firstname.lastname@example.org
JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is striking at the root." -- Henry David Thoreau <><