Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Kenya: Vegetarian Mankind a Threat to Wildlife

Expand Messages
  • AnimalConcerns.org
    [opinion from AllAfrica.com] Chicago forbade Foie de gras to be served in the city s restaurants. This highly priced delicacy consists of sick goose liver
    Message 1 of 1 , Sep 1, 2006
    • 0 Attachment
      [opinion from AllAfrica.com]

      Chicago forbade Foie de gras to be served in the city's restaurants.
      This highly priced delicacy consists of sick goose liver resulting
      from force feeding: stuffing the geese. The procedure is regarded as
      torture.

      The European Union has decided to phase out the pig slaughter
      practices in the traditional eastern countries: the sticking with a
      knife of the struggling animal, because of its gruesomeness.

      Most countries regulate the manner of killing of animals and have laws
      on the treatment of domestic species. Animals must be treated and
      killed "humanly".
      ...
      Bioethicists and animal rightists have sprung up to defend the animal
      kingdom from man's merciless depredations. In law, animals cannot have
      "rights" because animals are not persons. This does not mean that
      mankind can treat them without consideration. Animals, mammals in
      particular, are our nearest relatives and we are bound to treat them
      with consideration and compassion. It is obvious that animals do
      experience pain and discomfort and it is cruel and inhuman to ignore
      their plight.

      Yet without coercing animals, putting them to work, breeding them
      according to selected characteristics, humans would not have attained
      the level of development they have - neither would they have without
      the control of species that are detrimental to agriculture, storage
      and civil engineering.
      ...
      Radical animal rightists and bioethicists would like meat to be phased
      out of human nutrition altogether and turn the population into
      vegetarians. Such a policy would be disastrous at least in four
      respects.

      - It would make the fuel crisis and deforestation much worse, as
      cooking vegetable matter, particularly fibrous plants, requires much
      more energy than does the preparation of meat;

      - It would divert time away from production, for cooking and eating
      vegetables is more time consuming than the preparation of meat dishes

      - It would lead to the disappearance of entire domestic breeds and
      eventually species;

      - It would create a nutritional crisis in many parts of the world,
      leading to starvation, stunting and interference with brain
      development.

      People, deprived of meat, will eat more carbohydrates and fats and
      obesity, diabetes and their consequences will assume catastrophic
      dimensions.

      To try to change mankind into vegetarians simply because of compassion
      with animals would be foolish. On the other hand, animals must be
      treated better, husbanded with care. Their continuing supply must be
      secured (this is most notably so with regard to fish and other edible
      marine species which are depleted because of the "tragedy of the
      commons": they do not belong to anyone).
      ...
      To treat animals well is an obligation. To kill them with
      circumspection is dictated by our own dignity. To eat them is not a
      sin: for most of the world's population it is a necessity.

      The writer is a retired surgeon and a former chairman of the East
      African Wildlife Society

      --
      full story:
      http://allafrica.com/stories/200609010119.html

      ----- http://www.animalconcerns.org/ -----
      More News Headlines -- RSS Feed!
      New Links -- 100 most recent links!
      Events, E-Mail Lists, Jobs, Organizations, and Forums
      SEARCH for the item on Animalconcerns.org!
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.