Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [irlp-embedded] Re: "Connection Refused" error?

Expand Messages
  • David Cameron (IRLP)
    It depends who has to run it... As a rule of thumb, set all scripts as user repeater . The easiest way to do this is to write them all as user repeater. Dave
    Message 1 of 4 , Jan 21, 2011
    • 0 Attachment
      It depends who has to run it... As a rule of thumb, set all scripts as
      user "repeater". The easiest way to do this is to write them all as user
      repeater.

      Dave

      On 1/21/2011 1:16 PM, ipscone wrote:
      > You would win that bet. :-)
      >
      > Quick question: The script I loaded, just for test, shows up with "root" owner, and all the other scripts are "repeater". If one adds a script, should it be "repeater" owner or is "root" ok?
      >
      > Thanks,
      > Mike
      >
      > PS: That second node is getting close. It has cleared customs and is now in the U.S. postal system. If it's coming from Vancouver, it might be here today or tomorrow. ;-)
      >
      > Mike
      >
      > --- In irlp-embedded@yahoogroups.com, "David Cameron (IRLP)"<dcameron@...> wrote:
      >>
      >> If you rebooted the node, you have to wait a few minutes before the
      >> server-side listener starts. It is not started as part of the boot up
      >> scripts currently.
      >>
      >> It starts on a process check that runs every 20 minutes or so. I bet it
      >> it working now.
      >>
      >> Dave Cameron
      >>
      >> On 1/21/2011 12:30 PM, ipscone wrote:
      >>> My Remote panel was working fine. After I did a flash_sync, it stopped working. It will display properly the status of the node. I can enter DTMF commands from the radio but whenever I try to enter a DTMF from the remote panel, I get the following error:
      >>>
      >>> "Failure : Connection refused (111)
      >>> Server side command listener is not active."
      >>>
      >>> I was logged in as "root" when I did the flash_sync.
      >>>
      >>> I didn't change anything, that required flash_sync. I was just testing to see if an added script file needed to be followed by "flash_sync". I changed nothing on the system, except add a script that's not even used, to see if it would remain after a sync.
      >>>
      >>> Any idea what might be wrong?
      >>>
      >>>
      >>>
      >>
      >
      >
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.