Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

2878AUSTRALIA: US terror attacks used to introduce sweeping police powers

Expand Messages
  • Islamic News and Information Network
    Oct 4 4:03 AM
    • 0 Attachment

      US terror attacks used to introduce sweeping police powers

      By Mike Head

      4 October 2001


      At what is expected to be its last cabinet meeting before the federal
      election, the Howard government has announced far-reaching attacks on
      democratic rights, under the pretext of combatting terrorism in the wake
      of the September 11 events in the United States.

      Without offering the slightest evidence that terrorist groups are
      operating in Australia, Tuesdays meeting unveiled plans to give
      unprecedented detention and interrogation powers to the Australian
      Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), introduce sweeping
      British-style terrorism legislation and double the militarys Special

      ASIO will be given the power to hold and interrogate anyone for up to 48
      hours without charge or evidence. At present, criminal suspects can be
      detained a maximum of four hours before being charged or released, and
      they have the right to remain silent. But state and federal police, acting
      with ASIO, will have the power to arrest people and bring them before a
      prescribed authority whenever it is deemed necessary to protect the public
      from politically motivated violence. Moreover, after obtaining a warrant
      from a magistrate or administrative tribunal member, ASIO officers will be
      able to order people to appear before the prescribed authority (likely to
      be a court or tribunal) to provide information or produce documents, even
      if they are not themselves suspected of terrorist activity.

      The measures include possible five-year jail terms for people who refuse
      to answer terrorism-related questions, Attorney-General Daryl Williams
      revealed yesterday. The government has failed to provide further
      information on the extent or implications of these powers. Civil liberties
      organisations have warned that citizens, whether suspects or not, will be
      compelled to answer questions, tearing up the legal principles of natural
      justice and protection against self-incrimination. Furthermore, they may
      be forced to do so without knowing the identities of their ASIO accusers
      or what, if any, evidence exists against them.

      Vague new offences, modelled on the British Terrorism Act 2000 will be
      introduced, carrying a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. As in the
      Blair governments legislation, terrorism will be defined so broadly that
      it includes alleged threats of violence intended to advance a political,
      religious or ideological cause directed against government interests.
      These provisions can easily be used to target political opponents and
      dissidents. Furthermore, the government can proscribe so-called terrorist
      organisations, jail their members and seize their property.

      The militarys Special Forces, including the SAS Tactical Assault Group,
      recently mobilised against the Tampa refugees, will be effectively
      doubled. Crack units established during the Sydney Olympic Games will be
      reactivated. Under the military call-out legislation pushed through
      parliament just before the Olympics, the government can now use these
      troops against civilian targets in order to suppress unrest.

      In addition, armed plainclothes police will be placed at random on
      selected domestic and international flights. Despite objections by the
      airlines that the presence of weapons may endanger passenger safety, the
      government has rejected more effective protections such as the
      strengthening of cockpit doors. Finally, police and customs officers will
      be given more power to seek and seize assets.

      The government has flatly dismissed requests by journalists and civil
      liberties groups for more information on its measures, claiming that such
      information would threaten national security. Yet, in a media statement,
      Attorney-General Williams admitted that there is no intelligence available
      to indicate that Australia is an intended target of further terrorist

      To claim that ASIO needs more powers to detect terrorists is ludicrous. It
      already has the power to bug phones, instal listening devices in offices
      and homes, intercept telecommunications, open peoples mail, monitor
      on-line discussion, break into computer files and databases, seize
      computers and use tracking personal devices. The ASIO Director-General or
      his delegated officers can issue search and entry warrants, giving
      officers a legal carte blanche to conduct operations against political
      activists and organisations.

      Moreover, ASIO is part of an extensive security and intelligence network,
      that incorporates the external Australian Secret Intelligence Service
      (ASIS), the prime ministers Office of National Assessments (ONA), the
      state police Special Branches, the militarys Joint Intelligence Office
      (JIO) and an electronic eavesdropping agency, the Defence Signals
      Directorate (DSD).

      With parliament already adjourned for the election, due within weeks, the
      government will resort to extra-parliamentary means to introduce some of
      its measures, setting a precedent for by-passing parliament in the name of
      national security. Howard was anxious to unveil the package before calling
      the election, because once he does, his government enters caretaker mode,
      weakening its hand and requiring it to consult with the Labor Party on
      major decisions. Accordingly, he brought forward by four weeks a report
      from a high-level committee of government, military and intelligence
      officials that was convened only five days earlier on September 26.

      During last weeks parliamentary sittingthe last before the electionthe
      government introduced or pushed through a battery of other laws
      undermining democratic rights.

      * Law enforcement agencies will be able to intercept telephone, Internet
      and e-mail communications when purportedly investigating serious arson and
      child pornography offences, under the Telecommunications Interception
      Legislation Amendment Bill 2001.

      * Under the Intelligence Services Act 2001, ASIS and the DSD have been
      given criminal and civil immunity for their activities, and the public
      naming of their members has been outlawed, matching protections already
      enjoyed by ASIO. They have also been authorised to conduct surveillance
      against Australian citizens overseas.

      * The Crimes Act will be amended to increase the maximum penalty for
      espionage from 7 to 25 years jail and broaden the definition of espionage
      to include disclosing information about national security or defence. The
      legislation also protects information about the security or defence of
      another country under Australian possession or controla provision that
      seems to presage new acts of colonialism.

      * Seven anti-refugee bills were bulldozed through the Senate to legalise
      the use of military force to expel asylum seekers, excise parts of the
      country from the migration zone, build new offshore detention camps,
      extinguish refugee appeals to courts, deport asylum seekers lacking
      identity papers and override the international Refugee Convention
      definition of refugee status.

      ASIO raids terrorise Arab community

      In the days leading up to the cabinet meeting, the government, assisted by
      ASIO and a compliant media, sought to create the climate for its measures
      by declaring that terror groups linked to Osama bin Laden were active in
      Australia. Without advancing any evidence to substantiate these claims,
      large-scale police raids were conducted in Sydneys Arabic community.

      In one operation, an estimated 70 heavily-armed state and federal police,
      detectives and ASIO officers searched at least five homes and interrogated
      people in the working class suburbs of Campsie and Lakemba, seizing
      passports, financial records and other documents. No doubt tipped off in
      advance, media outlets played their part by splashing news of the raids
      all over the front pages of weekend tabloid newspapers.

      One woman told reporters that officers had held her face down at gunpoint,
      interrogated her in front of her two young children and turned the
      residence upside down. Outside Sydney, police and ASIO officers raided two
      holiday camps run by an Islamic youth organisation. Outraged members and
      parents gave television stations video footage showing that the camps were
      used for childrens games, including soccer and water sports.

      No arrests were made during or after the raids, making it obvious that
      they were conducted without any evidence of terrorist links. The only
      purpose for the raids was to intimidate the Arabic and Islamic community
      and boost the governments security crackdown.

      The government has refused requests by the New South Wales Council for
      Civil Liberties Council to produce information justifying the raids.
      Council president Cameron Murphy told the World Socialist Web Site: The
      past few days have seen Sydneys Arabic community terrorised. People have
      been held on the floor at gunpoint. ASIO is conducting investigations
      without any basis, seemingly operating on anonymous tip-offs. We have no
      way of knowing whether the raids are lawful or not. We have been trying to
      obtain the necessary information, and so has the media, but the government
      has refused to hand it over.

      Murphy commented that the raids demonstrated that ASIO already had immense
      powers. Every Australian has reason to fear ASIOs wide powers, which the
      government is now just extending. Under the new measures, if ASIO decides
      to intervene against you, it can compel you to answer questions, without
      being accountable to anyone. Everything is justified in the name of
      national security. ASIO is an unaccountable organisation. By giving it
      more power, the government is undermining the democratic process.

      A bipartisan bidding war

      The opposition Labor Party created the conditions for these moves, with
      its leader, Kim Beazley, accusing the government of being slow off the
      mark in boosting the powers of the police, military and intelligence
      apparatuses. Beazley also pledged, in advance, bipartisan backing for any
      measures that the government took, including its open-ended commitment to
      participate in the US military response to the September 11 terror

      Even before it has officially commenced, the election campaign has become
      a bidding war to tear up civil liberties, with Labor campaigning under the
      slogan: Security at home and security abroad. Beazley attempted to upstage
      the government by releasing his own 11-point package of anti-terrorist
      measures to boost the powers and resources of ASIO and the SAS.

      He called for the military to join the police and intelligence agencies in
      creating a homeland security forcea plan that would utilise the military
      call-out powers introduced for last years Olympics. A Labor government
      would establish a British-style Ministry of Home Affairs to coordinate
      police and intelligence networks. Beazley also advocated the establishment
      of a Coast Guard to assist the navy in patrolling the countrys borders and
      turning away unwanted refugees; the recruitment of federal air marshals to
      control airport and aircraft security; and tighter immigration checks.

      Releasing his package, Beazley emphasised that the Labor Party regarded
      its measures as indefinite and not merely targetted against those
      responsible for the terrorist outrages in the US. It is important to
      stress that these policies should be implemented because they are a
      necessary and permanent requirement, over and above the need to respond to
      the attacks of September 11, he said.

      Many in media and ruling circles have seized upon the events of September
      11 to bring forward previously prepared plans to curtail democratic
      rights. Under the cover of protecting citizens from terrorism, they are
      embracing measures that will be used to suppress political dissent and
      social unrest.

      An editorial in Rupert Murdochs the Australian began with the slogan
      whatever it takes invoked by British Prime Minister Tony Blair and US
      President George W. Bush to push for draconian police and security powers.
      In this climate, civil liberties must inevitably be balanced against the
      overriding threat to national and personal security, it declared.

      The Melbourne Age, which has a more liberal reputation, was even more
      blunt. There will be overreactions and infringements of the civil
      liberties of some individuals. We wish we could say these new laws are
      alarmist and unnecessary. Sadly, such a luxury no longer exists.

      Other commentators have been somewhat critical of the Howard governments
      response. In its editorial, the Australian Financial Review expressed
      reservations about giving ASIO unfettered power. It proposed instead that
      the security agencies make fuller use of traditional undercover methods.
      It noted that the already well-funded US intelligence services appear to
      have failed to pick up the bin Laden terrorist network more through their
      inability to penetrate its ranks using well-established techniques than
      through inadequate powers.

      For decades, ASIO has conducted surveillance, harassment and dirty tricks
      operations against socialists, militant workers and organisations, and
      individuals regarded as opponents of the political establishment. Files
      were kept on the activities, personal lives, movements and associates of
      all known members, supporters and sympathisers of left-wing organisations,
      including opponents of the Vietnam War.

      During the 1990-91 Gulf War, Labor prime minister Hawke and his senior
      ministers personally supervised and received reports on the undercover
      work of ASIO, such as phone-tapping, mail interception, bugging,
      infiltration of meetings and organisations. Similar operations were
      mounted by the Howard government in the lead-up to the Sydney Olympics and
      this years Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in Brisbane,
      now postponed due to the imminent US-led assault on Afghanistan.

      In a revealing comment, the officer in charge of CHOGM security,
      Queensland Police Commissioner Bob Atkinson expressed dismay at the
      gatherings cancellation. I am disappointed and many of the police officers
      and police members who planned and prepared for it would be probably
      disappointed as well. His remarks indicate that the security agencies
      regarded CHOGM, which had attracted anti-capitalist protests, and for
      which thousands of police and troops had been mobilised, as a testing
      ground for military-intelligence operations.

      CHOGM has been shelved until next year, but the Howard government, backed
      to the hilt by the Labor Party, is now utilising the events in the United
      States to arm the security agencies with powers and resources that go far
      beyond anything previously seen in Australia.

      ININ List Archives Found Here: http://www.egroups.com/messages/inin
      To subscribe please e-mail majordomo@...
      In the body type: "subscribe inin-net"

      To unsubscribe please e-mail majordomo@...
      In the body type in: "unsubscribe inin-net"



      "First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out because I was
      not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not
      speak out because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the
      Jews, and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew. Then they came for
      me, and there was no one left to speak for me." - Pastor Martin Niemoller
      regarding the Nazi reign.