Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

shed some light comments

Expand Messages
  • Jurydoctor@aol.com
    What do you think about these comments? Amy I d like to see the diagram, including a measument of the gap between 2nd and 3rd trailers. Also showing why
    Message 1 of 1 , Nov 21, 2004
      What do you think about these comments?

      I'd like to see the diagram, including a measument of the gap between 2nd
      and 3rd trailers. Also showing why Tex headlights don't count.

      Although defendant is not off the hook,
      Tex is partially at fault for not seeing the object. I.e., it could have
      been a large animal sitting there.
      I believe that if it was dark enough for the trailer to be hid, then it
      dark enough to have his head lights on. There for he must drive within
      light from the head lights. I can't believe that he didn't see the trailer
      unless he had something else distracting him of too much speed
      or was he talking on a cell phone or finding papers. Most drivers would
      seen this trailer.
      Illegally parked or not this trailer didn't move into his lane, he hit
      If all three trailers where parked unlawfuly,the tractor operatetors are
      responceable for the out come. A hazard reflector traingle should have been
      placed at a distance equal to the posted speed limit (in feet) plus the
      stoping distance required (in feet) for a vehicle traveling at the posted
      speed limit. Thats the farthest point. Also must go towards the back of the


      For example, a vehicle traveling at the posted speed limit of 40mph
      125 feet to stop. The most distance of an inmoveable object indacater
      be place at a distance of 165ft.
      (125 feet + 40 feet = 165 feet ).
      BUT ! IF Inmoveable object indacaters are limited,the farthest should be
      place in a pattern from right to left at 50 feet,than 20 feet,and at the

      back and front of the object,indacateing a hazard to the lane of travel

      Our tractor trailers in Alaska have to have reflective tape on them,360

      One thing to remember ! No matter what lies in the lane ahead,when you
      leave your lane you are
      responsible !


      Subject: shed some light-comments

      I think it happened as is alleged. Tex had the accident because it was too
      dark and the trailers were not visible until it was too late. All of the
      industrial parks I've ever driven through (and there have been a few - a
      short cut
      home...) were not terribly well-lit except near the front of the buildings,
      and the speed limits were never higher than 35 mph. I think Tex was not at

      I couldn't resist bouncing this off my senior traffic deputy and a
      state patrolman I ran into this AM during training. The questions I
      asked, they say, are reasonable ones for court.

      Based on their knowledge and experience, it sounds like your
      defendant would be a local government (probably streets and
      maintenance, or engineers.) The street lighting issue comes into
      play when the road is planned; also, local government ought to have a
      record of lighting/ signage requests on file. If indeed a record has
      been established of lighting requests, or even a pattern of accidents
      in that area, then the plaintiff might have a case against the local
      government, the accident having occurred on a public road.

      Speed limits do not have to be posted on all roads. In Alabama, the
      speed limit for an industrial area, two lane, two way road as
      described is 35 miles per hour. Conditions play a key role here; the
      speed limit is determined using clear, daylight illumination. It's
      up to the driver to adjust speed for conditions; that's why cops
      write tickets for speeding ("unsafe speed for prevailing traffic/
      weather conditions"). Additionally, drivers are responsible for the
      safe operation of their vehicle regardless of what others do (or in
      this case, don't do.)

      My two experts both agreed that the owners of the trailers (already
      stipulated as having been illegally parked) would have been cited for
      obstructing a public thouroughfare. They also would have cited Tex
      for excessive speed for prevailing conditions. One said he might
      have also cited Tex for driving the wrong way if there was a double
      yellow line present in the roadway. (I didn't read about it.) The
      state trooper, who is certified for DOT truck inspections, would have
      also written up the trailers for improper/missing display of
      reflectors and emergency warning triangles.

      The plaintiff (Tex) is setting himself up for failure if he is going
      after a local government. My experience is that engineers and road
      design specialists are pretty precise when it comes to record
      keeping. He stands a better chance of recovery, both in
      medical/insurance and punitive costs, if he goes after the trucking
      companies who owned the trailers. They have already admitted that
      they were parked illegally- which means (to me, anyway) that they
      were negligent in the proper and safe operation of the trailers.

      The plaintiff also should document that he was not operating while
      impaired in some way. That means everything from wearing seat belts,
      corrective lenses (if needed), proper prescription and use of
      medications, and rest prior to the accident. Tex's case would be
      immensely strengthened if there was some way to document that the
      accident resulted from unusual conditions existing at the time.

      Tex's case could also be immensely weakened if the defense can prove
      that he's used that road a lot (which would be the case if he was
      going to work.) Every commuter, develops a feel for your route,
      what's unusual and what's not. And if Tex was due at work in ten
      minutes from the time of the accident (it happened at 5:50AM- did Tex
      expect to clock in at 6:00AM?) he might have been rushing to get to


      .357 foot candles?

      If memory serves, a mine needs to be lit with at least 5 foot
      candles. That ain't much.

      You may want to research minimum legal lighting standards like those
      for mines, et cetera. So the jury has a standard reference for

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.