Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [infoguys-list] case of Bonnie

Expand Messages
  • iaoa7@aol.com
    In a message dated 8/22/2003 1:07:03 PM Central Daylight Time, ... She should have consulted with Physician. If investigated properly and evidence is brought
    Message 1 of 4 , Aug 25, 2003
    • 0 Attachment
      In a message dated 8/22/2003 1:07:03 PM Central Daylight Time,
      Jurydoctor@... writes:


      > My questions are:
      > >
      > > (1) Who wins the credibility battle between Jack and the nurse
      > > practitioner
      > > over what was actually said in the examination room?
      > > Jack if proper investigation is followed!
      > >
      > >
      > > (2) What difference, if any, does it make that the nurse practitioner
      > was
      > > licensed only as a registered nurse with no license to practice as a nurse
      > > practitioner although she had completed the formal schooling to become
      > one?
      > > Big difference, Nurse should have realized the seriousness of the
      > condition from the call the day before from patient. She should have then consulted
      > and called in the physician to follow up.



      > > (3) what else do you think about the case? Who wins? what is important
      >
      > > and what is not?
      > Important that Nurses past history is investigated.

      She should have consulted with Physician.
      If investigated properly and evidence is brought forward of
      this. JACK WINS!





      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.