Just a comment on this e-mail....Has anyone heard
about Elian Gonzalez......?
The government, isn't always correct.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 9:37
Subject: [infoguys-list] RE:
Thanks for clarifying
this situation. And if any of this is true, I am ashamed that you are
trying to discover her location or do anything that would interfere with an
existing proceeding. If as you say, it's going to the Supreme Court,
then she has representation. It is grossly unprofessional for you to be
doing anything other than communicate with her attorney. Period.
End of story. Get off her case.
The case is not finished, the abductor is prohibited to leave
Connecticut until The Supreme Court has decided, our job is to prevent the
abducter from fleeing a second time.
The second time, if the abductor
loses, would probably be to Jamaica.
So, the abductor is restricted
awaiting this decision, this US decision.
"Gil Zimmerman" <gilz@...>
Sun, 3 Dec 2000 14:31:45 +0100
Aan: <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "e-groups /
"e-groups / infoguys-list" <email@example.com>,
"e-groups / investigate" <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
"e-groups / Investigation-tips" <Investigationemail@example.com>,
"e-groups / investigations" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "e-groups
/ investigators" <email@example.com>, "e-groups / ipdclub"
<firstname.lastname@example.org>, "e-groups / kidhunters"
<email@example.com>, "e-groups / NIA" <NIA@egroups.com>,
"e-groups / PAinvestigations" <PAinvestigations@egroups.com>,
"e-groups / peoplesearch" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "e-groups /
PI2000" <PI2000@egroups.com>, "e-groups / picomputer"
<email@example.com>, "e-groups / piupdates"
<firstname.lastname@example.org>, "e-groups / Private-Eye"
<Private-Eye@egroups.com>, "e-groups / PrivateDetective"
<PrivateDetective@egroups.com>, "e-groups / shadowtrackers"
<email@example.com>, "e-groups / thePIgroup"
<thePIgroup@egroups.com>, "Rose Marie"
Onderwerp: [investigate] RE: [piworld]
proof? against Rose Marie
Unless I was missing something here,
Anselmo himself posted confidential information to a number of open lists,
including a document from a US Court that held there was sufficient
evidence that the father has sexually assaulted the child. If that
isn't good enough for PIs in the US, what the hell is? Anslemo is
representing the father and a US court has given custody to the mother,
which the document he provided indicated. He persists in trying to
get investigators to help him find the mother who is, according to Rose
Mary Seer, receiving the assistance of American law enforcement agencies
to protect her from the ex-husband.
So why would anyone help him? Just because he claims
another court has jurisdiction? I haven't seen any proof of that.
I don't agree with his tactics or methods and frankly, regardless of
what he says the father claims, I'd stick with the US Federal District
Court ruling as my measure of the known facts and truths.
Cabinet ERHART, Paris,
Anselmo LLobera [mailto:anselmo@...]
December 03, 2000 12:48 PM
To: e-groups / background; e-groups
/ infoguys-list; e-groups / investigate; e-groups / Investigation-tips;
e-groups / investigations; e-groups / investigators; e-groups / ipdclub;
e-groups / kidhunters; e-groups / NIA; e-groups / PAinvestigations;
e-groups / peoplesearch; e-groups / PI2000; e-groups / picomputer;
e-groups / piupdates; e-groups / piworld; e-groups / Private-Eye;
e-groups / PrivateDetective; e-groups / shadowtrackers; e-groups /
thePIgroup; Rose Marie
Subject: [piworld] proof? against Rose
Dear list members and moderators,
Until today I
am still waiting for proof of Rose Marie, against me.
No one on
any list can say that he has proof.
Not all the PI's together
will find that proof against me, with all the respect to the fine
P.I.'s on all lists, simply because there is
Post a message, send it to: investigate@...
Unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
subscribe, send an empty message to <a
unsubscribe, send a message to <a