Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [infoguys-list] CA trial

Expand Messages
  • Edward Santos
    Is this a special court session? How is it that court is in session on a National Holiday like this? I m curious and stumped. Thanks in advance for any
    Message 1 of 2 , Jul 4, 2011
    • 0 Attachment
      Is this a special court session? How is it that court is in session on a National Holiday like this? I'm curious and stumped. Thanks in advance for any responses.

      Sent from my iPhone

      On Jul 4, 2011, at 7:51 AM, trial <Jurydoctor@...> wrote:

      >
      > I am the trial consultant on this trial. It has been pretty amazing.. it has been the social media trial of the century our team of trial consultants (army) have been monitoring over 40,000 blogger's comments and chat rooms.. quite an education.
      > Judge has tied the defense hands many times. If there is a guilty verdict it will be appealed, lots of error.
      > Amy
      >
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: infoguys-list <infoguys-list@yahoogroups.com>
      > To: infoguys-list <infoguys-list@yahoogroups.com>
      > Sent: Mon, Jul 4, 2011 3:22 am
      > Subject: [infoguys-list] Digest Number 3309
      >
      > There are 4 messages in this issue.
      > Topics in this digest:
      > 1a. Trial Of The Century...
      > From: RickyG
      > b. Re: Trial Of The Century...
      > From: karousel
      > 2a. Why we are a Republic - a concise and informative learning video
      > From: suesarkis@...
      > b. Re: Why we are a Republic - a concise and informative learning video
      > From: Gregory Martinez
      >
      > essages
      > __________________________________________________________
      > a. Trial Of The Century...
      > Posted by: "RickyG" rmriinc@... rmriinc
      > Date: Sun Jul 3, 2011 10:48 am ((PDT))
      > Who has been watching or keeping up with the Casey Anthony trial?
      > I have been watching it as much as I can (which is not much). I do feel like it
      > as been interesting to follow, and even educational for any P.I. that does
      > riminal defense investigations; from what I have seen thus far.
      > I always hate these "professional armchair quarterbacks" on the news that are
      > upposed to be experienced attorneys and investigators; but so obviously can't
      > eparate their emotions, likes, and dislikes from the facts of the case. I would
      > ot hire almost all of those "dipsticks" to find my dog!
      > I have only seen one attorney on there that seems to make sense; her name is
      > Sunny Hostin". Other than her, all I see are a bunch of professional attorneys
      > nd investigators that have allowed their emotions to take over and guide their
      > udgment..
      > Despite what these "dipsticks" are saying, with the exception of "Sunny Hostin";
      > actually think that Jose Baez is actually doing a pretty good job as a Defense
      > ttorney; especially considering his experiences in death penalty cases.. He
      > eems to be attacking the Prosecutor's cases very aggressively
      > Either way it goes Casey Anthony is "screwed for life". if the Prosecutor
      > oesn't get her; the media already hasÂ…>
      > Anyone else care to comment on this sensational trial?
      >
      > Ricky Gurley
      > RMRI, Inc.
      > ttp://www.rmriinc.com
      > 573) 529-4476
      >
      > essages in this topic (2)
      > __________________________________________________________
      > b. Re: Trial Of The Century...
      > Posted by: "karousel" karousel@...
      > Date: Sun Jul 3, 2011 11:12 am ((PDT))
      > I haven't followed it at all. But I just read an article that stated the
      > rosecution has not provided any proof of how the child died.
      > I think that point hinders "beyond a reasonable doubt" that is required for
      > riminal convictions.
      > Sylvia
      > I do paralegal work)
      >
      > ----- Original Message -----
      > From: RickyG
      > To: infoguys-list@yahoogroups.com
      > Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 1:48 PM
      > Subject: [infoguys-list] Trial Of The Century...
      >
      > Who has been watching or keeping up with the Casey Anthony trial?
      > I have been watching it as much as I can (which is not much). I do feel like
      > t has been interesting to follow, and even educational for any P.I. that does
      > riminal defense investigations; from what I have seen thus far.
      > I always hate these "professional armchair quarterbacks" on the news that are
      > upposed to be experienced attorneys and investigators; but so obviously can't
      > eparate their emotions, likes, and dislikes from the facts of the case. I would
      > ot hire almost all of those "dipsticks" to find my dog!
      > I have only seen one attorney on there that seems to make sense; her name is
      > Sunny Hostin". Other than her, all I see are a bunch of professional attorneys
      > nd investigators that have allowed their emotions to take over and guide their
      > udgment..
      > Despite what these "dipsticks" are saying, with the exception of "Sunny
      > ostin"; I actually think that Jose Baez is actually doing a pretty good job as
      > Defense Attorney; especially considering his experiences in death penalty
      > ases.. He seems to be attacking the Prosecutor's cases very aggressively
      > Either way it goes Casey Anthony is "screwed for life". if the Prosecutor
      > oesn't get her; the media already has.
      > Anyone else care to comment on this sensational trial?
      > Ricky Gurley
      > RMRI, Inc.
      > http://www.rmriinc.com
      > (573) 529-4476
      >
      > ----------------------------------------------------------
      >
      > No virus found in this incoming message.
      > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
      > Version: 8.5.449 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3741 - Release Date: 07/03/11
      > 6:34:00
      >
      > Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
      > essages in this topic (2)
      > __________________________________________________________
      > __________________________________________________________
      > a. Why we are a Republic - a concise and informative learning video
      > Posted by: "suesarkis@..." suesarkis@... suesarkis2001
      > Date: Sun Jul 3, 2011 1:53 pm ((PDT))
      >
      > If anyone wants to fully understand the difference in the various types of
      > overnment, i.e., monarchy, oligarchy, democracy, republic and anarchy to
      > ee why our Founders chose a Republic rather than the others, this is the
      > est and most informative explanation I have ever witnessed. It explains the
      > American form of government in precise detail.
      >
      > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGL8CiUtXF0_
      > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGL8CiUtXF0)
      >
      > Sincerely yours,
      > ue
      > _______________________
      > ue Sarkis
      > arkis Detective Agency
      > (est. 1976)
      > I 6564
      > www.sarkispi.com_ (http://www.sarkispi.com/)
      > 1346 Ethel Street
      > lendale, CA 91207-1826
      > 18-242-2505
      > "one Nation under God" and "in GOD we TRUST"
      > If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read it in English,
      > hank a military veteran
      >
      > Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
      > essages in this topic (2)
      > __________________________________________________________
      > b. Re: Why we are a Republic - a concise and informative learning video
      > Posted by: "Gregory Martinez" gregmartinez@... gregmartinezpi
      > Date: Sun Jul 3, 2011 6:55 pm ((PDT))
      > This is a brilliant youtube.
      > The comparison of the history of Rome to the United States is amazing.
      > nfortunately, I believe we are already on the downward slope and transitioning
      > rom democracy to an oligarchy. I am not confidant we can put the breaks on and
      > o from democracy back to a constitutional republic.
      >
      > "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free."
      > John 8:32 - KJV]
      > ------------------------------
      > regory A. Martinez
      > rivate Investigator
      > YS PI lD#: 11000157180
      > http://web.me.com/gregmartinez/
      >
      > n Jul 3, 2011, at 4:52 PM, suesarkis@... wrote:
      > >
      >
      > If anyone wants to fully understand the difference in the various types of
      > government, i.e., monarchy, oligarchy, democracy, republic and anarchy to
      > see why our Founders chose a Republic rather than the others, this is the
      > best and most informative explanation I have ever witnessed. It explains the
      > American form of government in precise detail.
      >
      > _http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGL8CiUtXF0_
      > (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGL8CiUtXF0)
      >
      > Sincerely yours,
      > Sue
      > ________________________
      > Sue Sarkis
      > Sarkis Detective Agency
      >
      > (est. 1976)
      > PI 6564
      > _www.sarkispi.com_ (http://www.sarkispi.com/)
      >
      > 1346 Ethel Street
      > Glendale, CA 91207-1826
      > 818-242-2505
      >
      > "one Nation under God" and "in GOD we TRUST"
      >
      > If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read it in English,
      > thank a military veteran
      >
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
      >
      >
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
      > essages in this topic (2)
      >
      > <p><hr></p>
      > o subscribe, send an empty message to <a href="mailto:infoguys-list-subscribe@yahoogroups.com">infoguys-list-subscribe@yahoogroups.com</a><br/>
      > o unsubscribe, send a message to <a href="mailto:infoguys-list-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com">infoguys-list-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com</a><br/>
      > p><hr></p>
      > ----------------------------------------------------------
      > ahoo! Groups Links
      > Digest Email | Traditional
      > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
      >
      > ----------------------------------------------------------
      >
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
      >


      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.