Re: More Email Interception Arguments....
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Lists" <list@...> wrote:
> just goes to show you that there needs to be a serious reworking of
> USC Sec 2511 to clearly define storage and intercept as it pertains towrote the
> emails/electronic communications. I don't think the person that
> original law got any form of consultation with some geeks like us thatI think a lot of this hinges on the Judge's legal philosophy. Some
> understand the intent of the law and the technical side as well.
Judges believe in giving more weight to the spirit of the law, and
other Judges believe in giving more weight to the letter of the law. I
believe that the Judges that give more weight to the letter of the law
find this to be an appropriate ruling.
Personally, I think it is much harder to Judge the spirit or the
intent of the law than it is to judge by the letter of the law.
It appears that some rewording may be necessary to end this age old
- In a message dated 8/8/2008 2:43:43 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
Excellent! In the meantime see if you and the "experts" can reverse
the denial of the motion for summary judgment sought by Valence
In the very beginning I said that she found for the good guys against the
thieves although the good guys did a no-no. However, I also stated something
to the effect that with bad guys operating out of foreign countries and the
like, American businesses do not stand a chance anymore if they are forced to
abide by the laws since the bad guys don't.
In this case Discovery was ordered. The defense said certain records didn't
exist and that they provided everything they were ordered to do. They did
NOT. The plaintiffs then went out and got the ordered docs themselves. They
did exist and the court reviewed them.
Now, had she not ruled as she did, the unlawfully obtained docs would have
been quashed and she would not have been able to grant a 110+ MIL judgment
along with a permanent INJUNCTION. The money is a moot issue since all defs have
filed BK but the INJUNCTION is what they really needed. The piracy was
costing American companies a small fortune to the detriment of the American
economy and the good guys inuring to the benefit of the pirates.
As I said to Branscum many years ago, sometimes the ends does justify the
By the way, if anyone wants to review the entire case excluding only the
"chamber sessions" they can do so at -
Sarkis Detective Agency
1346 Ethel Street
Glendale, CA 91207-1826
"one Nation under God"
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read it in English, thank
a military veteran
**************Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget?
Read reviews on AOL Autos.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]