Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.


Expand Messages
  • Patrick Baird
    To Everyone: Excellent points from everyone. Maybe, we (private investigators) can collectively come-up with a generalized statement that can be used on our
    Message 1 of 12 , Sep 8, 2007
    • 0 Attachment
      To Everyone:

      Excellent points from everyone. Maybe, we (private investigators) can collectively come-up with a generalized statement that can be used on our blogs, emails, websites, etc. that helps educate the uninformed of the serious and sensitive predicament we are all in. These links can direct people to a central website/URL that will inform, offer sample text for emails/letters and more importantly list direct links, addresses and fax numbers to the various government agencies that are investigating and/or making these laws.

      We can not save call records - but as an industry we can try and help our associations and more importantly ourselves from future government intervention.

      Just a thought....

      Patrick Baird, TPLI

      1st Source / PDJ Investigations - Lic A10979
      Phone: 817-579-0083
      Fax: 817-579-5301
      Cell: 1-866-440-6110
      U.S. & International Skip Tracing & Telephone Investigations

      This e-mail contains confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the individual named on this transmission. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail please destroy this message immediately.
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: Bob Hrodey
      To: infoguys-list@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 11:06 AM
      Subject: Re: [infoguys-list] DEATH OF CALL RECORDS IN TEXAS

      suesarkis@... wrote:
      > In a message dated 9/7/2007 8:54:48 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
      > rth@... writes:
      > We already have legal access to them on a case by case basis where their
      > relevancy and importance can be demonstrated. It's called a subpoena.
      > That's quite loose enough for me, thank you. If you have a legitimate
      > need, open the case and get a subpoena. If not, mind your own business,
      > not mine!
      > Bob -
      > I do disagree with you on this one. The police and the municipalities do
      > not need SDT's. Why should we for the same case for the same evidence? Why
      > should we be forced to show our hand in advance robbing us of ANY opportunity
      > for surprise or impeachment? Also, at least here in CA, a consumer notice has
      > to be sent to the party prior to sending a subpoena and if they say NO, the
      > court might side with them. Many hundreds of thousands of dollars later,
      > the Supreme Court after the Appellate Court will send it back and grant the
      > SDT.

      That makes it seem pretty obvious that the State of CA deems this
      information to be confidential and worthy of protection.

      As for wholesale delivery of these records to LEO's... I'll admit to
      being a bit behind the curve since I've been out of LE for a number
      years but last I knew the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986
      (and as it's been amended) prohibits the release of this information to
      LE without court order or subpoena. MUD and TOLLS, the call records
      we're talking about required a subpoena from LE even before ECPA.
      Suspect that this may have changed with the Patriot Act, etc. but...

      As for kidnappings and parental abductions? If the family hasn't
      involved LE, that's their problem and that of the victim.

      > Not only is this such an outrageous waste of money, it is also a totally
      > unfair disadvantage to our side.

      Yes, it is. However, to advocate giving carte blanc access to these
      records to any private detective is just asking for it. These extreme
      examples, as cited by Ricky, are the exception, not the rule. The
      firestorm and subsequent legislation that rained down on us did NOT
      arise due to some PI getting tolls to solve a kidnapping. It came from
      some idiots figuring that the end justified the means. Well, I think
      they found out that it didn't.

      No offense to anyone reading this (but if the shoe fits) but, quite
      frankly, we all know of folks who are walking around stating they are
      PI's and, in the eyes of the law, they are. However, there are a number
      of those folks that I would not trust to pour water out of a bucket if
      the instructions were printed on the bottom of the bucket and they were
      instructed to read the directions first<g> These are the folks who are
      going to have access to my personal records? Don't think so.




      Hrodey & Associates Established 1977
      Post Office Box 366 Member of NALI, ASIS, FBINAA, NAPPS
      Woodstock, IL 60098-0366 NCISS, Assoc Det of IL & P.A.W.L.I.
      Licensed in IL & WI (815) 337-4636 Voice 337-4638 Fax
      email: inquiry@... or rth@...
      Illinois License 115-000783 Wisconsin 8045-063

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.