Re: Men offer twist to Simpson case
Thanx for sharing your thoughts....however there is another reality
to this situation...
The attorneys are going after the monies that the civil trial found
Oj liable for. He is not being retryed, so I do not believe this is
a case of double jeapordy. Just my thoughts and again thanx for
Alfred Smith Detective Agency
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, Kenneth Irvin
>to sue someone,sue the LA County Prosecutors office as they lost the
> I don't belive that he should have to pay it anyway!!! If you want
case.If he was guilty ,they should have had no problem finding him
so.If not?? ALL bets should be off.That actually is double
jeopardy.I know that alot of people feel otherwise.Hold people
accountable!!! How many other people have or have not gotten away
with something of this magnitude.Is justice blind??? NO!!!! Hell
No.Leave the guy alone and let him live his life and raise his kids
in peace.Period!!!! Ken
>to put the squeeze on O.J. Simpson.
> Alfred <alfrdsmith@...> wrote: Two Indianapolis men want
> The good, the bad and the beautiful
> Indianapolis law firm Sommer Barnard has represented numerous late
> celebrities and their estates, including:
> Actress Marilyn Monroe's estate in a right of publicity case
> photographs. The case is pending in Indiana, New York andCalifornia.
> Jazz musician Duke Ellington's estate in litigation with Gibson
> Guitar Corp. and Baldwin Piano Co.
> Actor John Wayne's estate in several cases.
> Bank robber John Dillinger's estate in an Indiana case against
> Lake County Convention & Visitors Bureau and John DillingerMuseum.
> Continental Enterprises, an intellectual property consulting andmillion
> enforcement company, also works with this estate.
> On Tuesday, attorney Jonathan Polak filed a petition in California
> Superior Court in an attempt to make Simpson cough up $33.5
> for the deaths of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and herfriend
> Ronald Goldman.collect?
> It's been almost a decade since a civil jury ordered the former
> football star and actor to pay up. But Simpson has said repeatedly
> that he has no income to pay to Fred Goldman, Ronald Goldman's
> So how are Polak and Hoosier colleague Karl Manders going to
> They want Simpson to sign over his "right of publicity" to Fredmade
> The petition, believed to be the first of its kind, would place
> Goldman in charge of any attempts to make money off of Simpson's
> name, image, voice or likeness. For example, any profit Simpson
> from signing autographs would go to Goldman.of
> "It came to me like a bolt out of the blue," said Manders, owner
> Indianapolis-based Continental Enterprises Inc., an intellectualcontrol
> property consulting company. "The main assets he has are his face
> and his signature."
> In the same way Marilyn Monroe's estate owns and controls when and
> where the late actress' face is used, Goldman would own and
> Simpson's face, if the judge approves the petition.think
> Sound crazy?
> Simpson's attorney, Yale Galanter, says so.
> "We've not been able to find a single case that allowed a court to
> award involuntarily the right of publicity," he said. "I don't
> there's any legal basis for this."a
> Some other attorneys say otherwise.
> "You could do it," agreed Alan Ross, an intellectual property
> attorney at Bricker & Eckler LLP cq in Cleveland. "It's a little
> scary to think about doing it. It's a different kind of concept."
> By law, a person's right of publicity is considered an intangible
> property. That's opposed to a tangible property, such as a car or
> Under California law, intangible property and tangible property
> one in the same.debt
> So that means, signing over your right of publicity to settle a
> would be no different than signing over your house, legal expertsUntil
> say. Both have value and are separate from you as a person.
> Still, this case could set a precedent, Ross and Polak agreed.
> now, only patents and copyrights have been seized as intangibleodd
> property to settle debts.
> Using the right of publicity was Manders' idea. And it was Manders
> who contacted and sold it to Goldman.
> Goldman, who wasn't available for comment, thought the idea was
> at first, Manders admitted. But after several conversations,Goldman
> began to believe it could work.it,"
> "More than anything else, I think he saw the poetic justice of
> Manders said. "It was his celebrity that helped him get off. Itwas
> the very celebrity of his face and his likeness that could givethe
> Goldmans some justice."continued
> In 1995, a jury found Simpson not guilty for the murders of his ex-
> wife and Ronald Goldman.
> Two years later, a civil jury found Simpson liable for the deaths
> and ordered him to pay Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson's estate.
> However, California law protects pensions, so Simpson has
> to live off his NFL pension. He also moved to Florida, where asigning
> residence cannot be seized to settle a debt.
> Simpson has been accused of making a significant income from
> autographs and appearing at trade shows.right
> Simpson's attorney, Galanter, said his client does make some money
> from autographs and speaking engagements, but it's nowhere near
> $33.5 million.
> "If O.J. had $33 million, the judgment would be paid," said
> Galanter, who added Simpson is "living well."
> Polak and Manders said they believe Simpson has money. But they
> admit they have no idea how much, and therefore, how much his
> of publicity is worth.Barnard.
> But they say it's not really about money anyway.
> "It's more about protection and control in the way he goes about
> using his infamy," said Polak, director and chairman of the
> Intellectual Property Group at Indianapolis law firm Sommer
> Putting Goldman in charge of Simpson's right of publicity willtake
> away his ability to make money spoofing the murders.rumored
> For example, he won't be able to make a reality TV show, as
> in the media, or get a paycheck for signing autographs at a tradenegotiate
> show for fans of murder trials. At the very least, the company
> making the TV show or running the trade show would have to
> a deal with Goldman, not Simpson. That could be a deterrent.money,
> And perhaps, Manders reasoned, if Simpson can no longer make
> he'll no longer want to do such things.
> "The problem is the money," he said. "We believe that's his
> motivation for doing that."
> A hearing on the petition is scheduled for Oct. 17, although a
> resolution could come before that, Galanter said.
> "I can assure you, we will be in court on Oct. 17, fighting this
> tooth and nail," Galanter said.
> Kenneth M. Irvin
> Surety Recovery Service
> Investigations - Repossessions
> Bail Enforcement
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]