10663Re: [infoguys-list] newspaper
- Feb 27, 2007Amy -
I'm not certain who, but someone's not paying attention. Why would anyone
think the damages were only for 48 hours? Haven't we already discussed the
fact that the newspaper did not print any retraction within the 10 days
required? That would have been 10 days from the finding of innocence, per se, which
was days after the seed was planted by the Miami Herald.
Another consideration is the betting window. Am I going to place a bet at
the Preakness and Belmont for someone accused of cheating? Although that
would not affect the "stakes" portion of the payout it sure as heck would affect
the "window" portion. Santos' valuators and accountants might be able to put
together a very convincing projection of what the purse might have been by
extrapolating the attendance and wagering figures at the KD in comparison to
the Preakness & Belmont. Add to that those that didn't before but would have
now had it been for the bad publicity. With that you are looking at a small
fortune as there is no doubt in my mind that his experts will be able to
project big losses for both the Preakness and the Belmont.
Add to that the stigma that will always shadow him because that is the
nature of the beast and again, I strongly suggest the defendants make a healthy
and public offer along with another more convincing retraction.
Sarkis Detective Agency
1346 Ethel Street
Glendale, CA 91207-1826
"one Nation under God"
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read it in English, thank
a military veteran !
<BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free
email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>