[TwinCLinG] Re: frontend servers back end servers
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh@...> wrote:
>Woah! I thought only google groups was very bad at managing spam . Somehow, I felt that I was very harsh after sending out the email and my apologies to the sender.
> theju [26/11/09 02:59 -0000]:
> >Is this some kind of a joke?
> >First, instead of starting a new thread you use an existing and unrelated
> >thread to ask your question.
> My fault - though it reached the list, it seems to have got held up as
> "suspected spam" by yahoogroups for some reason. Yahoogroups being silly I
> guess. I released the email .. then realised it'd already been posted to
> the list.
I don't know how this got reposted. The responses worked for me and I have also completed the project. I don't know how this has been re-posted .. Sorry if it is a mistake from my end.
From: theju <thejaswi.puthraya@...>
Sent: Thu, 26 November, 2009 8:29:59 AM
Subject: [TwinCLinG] Re: frontend servers back end servers
Is this some kind of a joke?
First, instead of starting a new thread you use an existing and unrelated thread to ask your question.
Second, you have asked this question a couple of days ago and people have responded and you simply repost your previous question without any changes as if no one responded.
What are you trying to imply?
 http://tech. groups.yahoo. com/group/ ilughyd/message/ 20666
PS: Sorry to top-post on this one.
--- In ilughyd@yahoogroups .com, rajesh kodali <rajeshkodali@ ...> wrote:
> I have a specific requirement that ther should be one server
> that is facing the external world. with ip xx.xx.xx.xx and mapped to
> dns hosts 1.server.com, 2.server.com and 3.server.com
> when the server receives request for 1.server.com: 80 then the request has to be sent to internal server 1 on privet ip example 192.168.0.1: 80
> when server receives request for 2.server.com: 80 then the request has to be sent to 2 on private ip 192.168.0.2: 80
> so on
> So how does iptables recognize hostname for port translation instead of ip as the external server has the same ip.
> Can this be attained by iptables or should we use any other like apache. The scenario is explained by image attached.
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]