Re: sorry for spamming the group
- sorry - replied too early before the brain was engaged
1) Pearl Harbor January -- was a typo
2) the idea with the mech and powersuits having non-physical stats is to reflect the built-in AI and sensors
3) I wrestled with Prowess for vehicles. It seemed to me that there should be a way to reflect the "fighting enhancement" that a well built vehicle offered to a pilot. And that's what this was supposed to be. I retrospect - we should probably combine vehicle and pilot stats into one statblock for ease of use during combat
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "dirkgentry2000" <dirkgentry2000@...> wrote:
> we'll get those fixed and upload the corrected version - thanks!
> --- In email@example.com, "Curt \"Cripplepotomus\" Meyer" <curtmeyer@> wrote:
> > I bought you guy's book and Doom. The Vigilance ICONS pdf purchase is
> > becoming a Sunday night ritual. Is there any particular reason the Japanese
> > Super group is referred to as "Pearl Harbor January" in this one? I've found
> > the vehicle stats in your past two pdfs welcome, but you guys have chosen to
> > assign a Prowess score to your vehicles, whereas, if I remember correctly,
> > ION Guard does not. What does Prowess represent in terms of vehicle
> > performance? I'm really glad to see a mech in this one too. I love mechs!
> > Why do the mechs and power suits have non-physical stats; wouldn't those be
> > based on the pilots?