- In a message dated 30/06/2006 14:17:19 GMT Standard Time, firstname.lastname@example.org writes: This french site was translated to english. I believe some if thisMessage 1 of 1 , Jun 30, 2006View SourceIn a message dated 30/06/2006 14:17:19 GMT Standard Time, humlobotomist@... writes:
This french site was translated to english. I believe some if this
material do explain the reason for the Hum. Judge for yourself!
petit.com/Divers/ Arme_meteorologi que/aurore_ boreale_artifici elle.htm
First aurora borealis created by the man
Let us start by reproducing two successive articles published in the
PHYSICS: For the first time, researchers started in the sky of Alaska
a phenomenon visible with the naked eye with radio waves
The American army creates an aurora borealis. Two American scientists
succeeded in causing the first aurorae boreales artificial visible
with the naked eye, thanks to the use of a powerful military system
dedicated to the study of the ionosphere, the highest layer of the
atmosphere. The Haarp instrument which was used for this experiment
been the object of many polemic because some show it to be able to
modify the climate with fine soldiers, to even stop any form of radio
communication on planet.
[ February 03, 2005 ]
The Haarp installation, close of the town of Gakona in Alaska,
constitutes a field of radio antennas. This instrument allows the
study of the ionosphere, the highest layer of the atmosphere, and
should help the scientists to elucidate the modes of creation of the
aurorae boreales. (DR..)
The military installation Haarp in Alaska made a success of an
astonishing first: to already create artificially luminous spots
within powerful an aurora borealis in activity. "A my knowledge, it
is the first time that radio transmissions produce an enough powerful
luminous activity to be visible with the naked eye, explains by
courriel Todd Pedersen, scientist of the Air Force Research
Laboratory of Hanscom in Massachusetts and signatory of discovered
(1). There already was in the past of the artificial light outputs of
the same type created by dispersions of chemicals (barium, aluminium
trimethyl) or electron beams, but never by radio waves."
The heating of the high layers of the atmosphere is practised since
the years 1960 to directly study the behavior of the electrons in
this so particular medium. "This technique of activation makes it
possible to work with a laboratory of plasma on a very large scale",
supplements Wlodek Kofman, director of the laboratory of planetology
of Grenoble. It is known for a long time that the electrons
accelerated by the terrestrial magnetic field cause aurorae boreales
while penetrating in the atmosphere in the polar areas.
These fast electrons from time to time strike atoms present in the
atmosphere, excite them in their removing one or more electrons with
the passage. While "being calmed" and while turning over towards
their state of balance, the atoms emit light radiations green or more
rarely red, so characteristic of the polar lights. The guiding
principle of this mechanism is well known, but the medium of plasmas,
these gases of excited atoms and free electrons, is very complex and
other secondary phenomena still escape from comprehension from the
As often in science, the discovery of the two American scientists was
unexpected. Usually, the researchers do not even try to make function
the instrument when aurorae boreales illuminate the sky, because the
natural activity is often much stronger than the artificial
disturbances caused by Haarp. But instead of remaining the arms
crossed while waiting for that the dawn from goes away at the time
one night of March 2004, the two scientists put the instrument all
the same on the way, by aiming at an area of the lower ionosphere,
around 100 km of altitude, that that generally excited. And with
their great surprise, their optical telescopes clearly showed that a
green point brilliance appeared and disappeared quickly, according to
the rate/rhythm of operation of the radio operator transmitters. "We
were so excited by this discovery which we remained inside, vis-a-vis
of our control screens and we did not even think of going to see
outside what occurred, tells Todd Pedersen. But our recordings show
clearly that the phenomenon was visible with the naked eye." The
researchers now understood that their radio pulsations have in fact
amplified the aurora borealis natural. The reproduction and the
precise study of this particular phenomenon should help the
scientists with better including/understan ding the modes of creation
of the aurorae boreales.
(1) Nature, February 3, 2005.
The military antennas are since years the object of all the
phantasms. Do Haarp, peaceful project or arm secret?
[ February 03, 2005 ]
Is Haarp (High frequency activates auroral research program) a
scientific tool like the others, or acts it in fact of a cover for an
American military program ultrasecret aiming inter alia handling the
climate by heating the ionosphere with waves radios? Some American
activists as of the members of the Russian Parliament think very
seriously that it acts of a "geophysical weapon" of a new type which
could radically upset the climatic balance of whole planet. Certain
rare inhabitants of the area in Alaska show Haarp of all the evils.
One of them affirms to have seen green gleams above the antennas,
whereas another known as to have seen caribous going to move back.
However, at first sight, the Haarp installation, close of the small
town of Gakona in Alaska, does not have anything particularly
alarming. It acts simply of a field of radio antennas, masts and
cables tended in all the directions, covering 9 hectares in the
medium with a forest of conifers. Moreover of many antennas of the
same type exist in the world, in Puerto Rico, in Russia, in
Tadjiskistan and in Norway, but none them gives birth to as many
phantasms as Haarp. But it true that Haarp, with the difference of
all the other equivalent scientific instruments, is a joint military
installation between US Navy and the US Air Force, is financed
directly by the American department of Defense, without having to
pass by a process of evaluation by American researchers as it is the
The recent creation of dawns artificial by the antennas radios of
Haarp proves, if need be, that the installation functions, and that
its radio transmissions are quite able to heat the ionosphere (1).
But is this sufficient to have an impact on the terrestrial climate,
or to modify the remote weather? "It is fun!, esclaffe Philippe
Zarka, astronomer specialist in the plasma physics at the Observatory
from Paris in Meudon.
Immediate remark : Philippe Zarka is not a "specialist in the plasma
physics" it is a simple engineer, Petri of popularization scientific,
without more, which had been formerly ventured to criticize my
work "One lost half of the universe" (Albin Michel 1997), at the
request of Herve This, editor associated with the review For Science,
by lengthening conneries on conneries. My legitimate request for
right of reply moreover remained vain.
The energies injected by Haarp in the ionosphere, a few megawatts
even a few tens of megawatts, are completely negligible compared to
the contribution of the Sun. At the top of the atmosphere, the Sun
does not deposit less than 1,4 GW (1,4 billion Watts) per square
kilometre." Moreover, the scientists succeeded in illuminating with
Haarp a very small area of the sky, in the heart of a dawn natural
already active, and which, it, set ablaze half of the sky under the
effect of electrons accelerated by the lines of terrestrial magnetic
Ca was not the objectives. See further.
In addition, of the installations of active study of the ionosphere
exist since more than one about thirty years, but never were
seriously shown to ruin the climate. The antiones advance that the
American military installation is much more powerful, therefore much
more dangerous than the others. But its current level of power, 960
kw, is comparable with that of the other instruments. In 2006, with a
final power of 3,6 MW, Haarp will be only three times more powerful
than its predecessors, which does not represent a significant
Beyond the phantasms on the handling of the climate or the action of
the waves on the behavior of the caribous, it is on the other hand
obvious that the American soldiers did not invest 90 million dollars
in Haarp by pure philanthropy. Besides Navy and the US Air Force
explain openly on the Web site of Haarp the reasons of their interest
for the ionosphere. This layer of the atmosphere is more or less
charged in electrons according to hours' with the night or the day,
or according to the latitude. And these variations influential on all
the signals radios which cross it.
The time of course of the ionosphere is, for example, one of the most
important parameters of correction to improve the precision of the
system of positioning per satellite GPS. In a more futuristic way,
the heating specific and modulated certain areas of the ionosphere
could be used to transmit radio messages of extremely low frequency
which the submerged submarines can receive. Such transmitters at very
low frequency are already in service, but do not have a total range.
(1) the ionosphere is an area of the atmosphere far from dense, above
100 km altitude in which many atoms lost their electrons and thus
form a plasma.
My comment :
IL is tiring to see journalists addressing itself to scientists not
equipped with jugeote, whose role seems to be to reassure the
opinion. In addition, the criticism of any technical projection is
perceived in the scientific world like a criticism... of science
itself. Quite rare are the scientists who make hear their voice to
denounce these dangerous diversions. When this position is adopted,
one is "inconsiderately alarmist". That applies to all the fields.
You will not have to seek to well far find biologists who will praise
you the merits of the genetic engineering or those of the nuclear
whole. Those which push cries of alarm are only paranoiacs or turned
sour, held far from the financial baskets, which seek only through
such declarations to be made interesting.
Lbe soldiers thus find in the scientists of powerful combined, in
particular because the Army has many capacities to promote or slow
down careers. The DGA (General Delegation with the armament, in the
past the DRET, Direction of Research and Studies Technical) is large
dispenser of appropriations in many laboratories, through the
contracts which it signs with them. There is not practically any
laboratory of physics in France which does not have its contract DGA
or which does not make benefit the students from purses. You thus do
not wait to see scientists spitting in soup, the watchword being:
All is for best in the best of possible sciences.
Dès August 2002 I devoted a file to project HAARP. It is overwhelming
to see that the journalists are unaware of, or pretend to be unaware
of the starting point of such a project. As to imagine only one
second that the Armed American one can be interested in the study of
the ionosphere by simple scientific curiosity?
L' idea starting is to find a means of communicating at long distance
with submarines. It is known that only radio waves of very low
frequencies (ULF: Ultra Low Frequency) can cross thick layers of sea
water. To emit waves of very low frequencies, therefore very big
wavelengths one needs antennas which are largest possible. In France
one will not find example these antennas on the plate of Valensole.
How to have antennas which extend on tens, even hundreds of
kilometers? That seems physically impossible.
ON thus imagined to use the ionosphere as antenna. As its name
indicates it this layer of the atmosphere, located towards the 100-
120 kilometers of altitude is ionized, composed of ions and free
electrons this ionization is maintained by the solar radiation and
its radiation UV. Only a ultratviolet radiation and with beyond A
enough of energy to release from the electrons which revolve around
molecules or of atoms. The ionosphere is thus a natural plasma. this
plasma is sensitive to the electromagnetic waves, with the ultra high
frequency radiation emitted by the antennas of the Haarp
UN radiation electromagnetic is a wave, in which the electromagnetic
field varies. It acts on the particles charged. It starts by simply
crossing without too many difficulties the low layers of the
atmosphere which are not ionized, because this field acts can on the
electrons related on the molecules and the atoms. In altitude this
field related to the radiation "shakes" the free electrons,
communicates energy to them. The ions, positively charged, are less
sensitive to this request of making of a lower mobility, related to
their mass (a proton is 1850 times heavier than an electron). One can
schematically regard a plasma as a mixture of two "species": a "free
gas of electrons" and a gas of heavy species, in the event ions. The
radiation HF heats gas of electron. This one thus tends to dilate,
more than gas the "heavy ones". It follows from there a phenomenon of
separation of the electric charges which I had already described in
my site three years ago.
EN modulating the power injected into the ionosphere by the antennas
one can thus create radial oscillations of gas of electron with
respect to the mass of the ions, heavier. One can thus be useful
oneself of this area of the ionosphere like radio antenna, by making
it function with extremely low frequencies.
IL is overwhelming not to read this kind of comment in an article of
Barber-Sciences or the mouth of our be-saying specialist-plasmas,
engineer Philippe Zarka, of Meudon. But this fact one
includes/understand s why the soldiers were interested in this device.
The remark concerning the fact that power of system HAARP and
thousand times weaker than the total power sent by the sun on the
ground (1400 megawatts per square kilometre) is not relevant. HAARP
is not intended to communicate energy with the Earth's atmosphere but
to modify the contribution of energy coming from the sun. The nuance
is important. In all the weapons which aim at "using the forces
present in nature" the system of release have nothing to dohas
nothing to do with the energy implemented by the phenomenon itself.
Ca is obviously not with the energy contained in a detonator which
one will be able to go up tens of thousands of tons of tons which
will constitute an avalanche, thousand meters with the top of a
village. Ca is not with the energy contained in a bomb H which could
possibly create an important seismic phenomenon that one will move
the north of the island of Sumatra of 25 meters. Ca is not a
transmitting system of waves electromagnetic which goes gaver a
thermal area of energy during days or with countered to deprive some
by creating a reflecting layer. Definitely this aspect escapes still
completely from the reflexion from the scientists.
IL exists a second use of such a device of type HAARP: to create
ionized zones of weak extension. It is that which our two scientists
saw, this result being presented like "fortuitous, unexpected". In
fact these people foutent themselves straightforwardly of you. These
experiments in fact have been undertaken for several decades
successfully. It acts of an assembled scenario of any part to make
you believe that while thus wanting "to study the ionosphere" of the
scientists (implied to the neck in the project) suddenly had the
enormous surprise to note that they had created a "mini-dawn boreal".
IL simply acts to start to accustom people to this kind of "play".
OR it is all except a play. I reexplic, for the nigth time:
ON will use three electromagnetic radiation sources, located on the
ground (even in space). The two first emit in frequencies N1 and N2.
One manages so that, in the atmospheric layer concerned (30-70 km)
the frequencies are too high to ionize the air. There exists indeed,
for a density of air given, a frequency of resonance. In the air one
will always find some electrons free. If one "shakes them" with a
variable electromagnetic field (an electromagnetic wave) these
electrons will make return tickets between the close atoms and
molecules. Imagine that you held a hammer between two bells and that
you make rebound this hammer from one bell to another. You imagine
well that you will meet a frequency of resonance when you can exploit
the capacity of rebound of the hammer on the two bells. By doing this
you will be able to go until... breaking them.
Vous will find a phenomenon similar in a gas, in the air. The
frequency of resonance depends on its pressure (in fact of its
density). The time which will put a free electron to rebound from one
atom to another, from one molecule to another will be called time of
mean free path. One will call the reverse of this time the electronic
frequency of collision in gas, with this pressure and temperature
given. For air with a pressure lower than the millimetre of mercury
(in a "vacuum bell-jar") this frequency is of the order of the
million hertz. One will then ionize easily this medium with the
electromagnetic wave emitted by a simple reel of Rhumkorff, under one
megahertz. In air with the atmospheric pressure, denser, where the
mean free path is more reduced, where the frequency of collision is
stronger it will be necessary to implement frequencies of the order
of the gigahertz (thousand mégahetz) which is typically those emitted
by the klystrons of the radars, but also by the antenna of the
microwave of your kitchen.
Rlet us evenons with our ionizing system. The two sources N1 and N2
have frequencies which differ from the frequencies of resonances of
low crossed layers. But if the faiseaux ones are crossed a phenomenon
of "beat appears then". One manages so that the difference of the
frequencies: (N1 - N2) that is to say close to the frequency of
resonance to altitude where the two beams cross. Then one will ionize
there and not elsewhere. It was this manipulation which our two
researchers made, but they were not going to have fun with you to
tell it. It was simply a question of starting to accustom people of
the area (and the public) to the idea that one can "accidentally"
create mini-dawns boreal artificial.
Blet us see some....
With what that is used?
ON sweeps space with these two beams by creating with will a rather
thin ionized layer, to which one can give does not import which
shape, y included/understood that of a concave mirror able to reflect
the radiation emitted by a third source and to then redirect it at
very long distance. This mirror will be visible only of night. For
more discretion it is preferable to operate day. The ionized layer,
emitting little light, will be then practically undetectable.
IL is tiring to see scientists or alleged such statement that the
Haarp system has a negligible influence on the upper atmosphere. It
sagit not to constitute great volumes of ionized gas. Besides Ca, the
Sun takes care some, by devoting only one very weak part of energy
that it sends to us. The remainder feeds photosynthesis, heats
IL acts to locally modify the transparency of the upper atmosphere,
either in "opening a window" or by creating a reflective surface. It
is in that that HAARP takes climatic value of weapon. Several systems
are then combined to operate an erudite handling of the Earth's
atmosphere. Chemical substances can be widespread in altitude using
planes to constitute reflective layers. If one allows the wire days
with a mass of hot air to constitute oneself in an area and with a
mass of cold air to settle in another, distant hundreds or even of
thousands of kilometer, one will arrive inevitably at a point of
instability where the rebalancing of the pressures will pass by a
phenomenon which could be extremely brutal, violent and destroying,
with winds of 200 kilometers per hour, to see more. A phenomenon
which could be completely strange in the touched area, people being
by no means accustomed to see cyclones devastating their cities,
their forests and their cultures.
Dyears these cases, if a system similar to HAARP contributed to
create the phenomenon that is not him which would provide destroying
energy but the Sun!
CE which is killing, as for the seismic weapons, it is that the
scientists systematically confuse destroying energy brought into play
by the phenomenon and that which was used as release. One has the
impression that the message of the scientific community is:
- Be without concern, good people. Continue to sleep on your two
ears. Those which seek with you worry are mistaken. Nothing of all
that exists. The soldiers sign only peaceful studies of the
environment of the Earth, of its ionosphere. The stressing of the
frequency of the phenomena devastators, of the tornadoes or cyclones,
including in Europe, are due only to... the reheating of the
atmosphere related to the effect of greenhouse. The soldiers do not
have nothing to do there. Do not believe either that they are
responsible for the strandings of the Cetacea on our coasts. It
probably acts of a virus not identified which is caught some with
their inner ear and not of the effect of the sonars of the submarines
and the ships.
The genetic engineering is without danger. Moreover, when one wants
to study a plant genetically modified in full nature, one puts a
fence around. When the bees see netting, they include/understand and
make half-turn. There are thus no risks of dissemination of the
seeds. There are no either hypersonic planes flying to ten thousand
kilometers per hour with the top of your heads as some try to make
you believe it. All that corresponds to one "is delirious
technological" . The Americans are far from being at this stage. See
these tests of which they return account to us, corresponding to the
Note the modest size of this machine. These studies are only with the
stammerings. We are far from a machine of big size. If these machines
existed, we would know it, go! The idea as what the tsunami which
devastated Indonesia could be created by the man is simply delirious.
Consider the fact that the American base of Diego Garcia, where are
based strategic bombradiers, was saved thanks to the providential
presence of a 5000 depth meters oceanic pit like due to the simple
chance. Even thing for the overflight by an American altimetric
satellite, just at the moment when the phenomenon could be studied
best. Idem for the presence of important American forces armed not
far from there, December 26. The evil should not be seen everywhere,
as some are ingénient to do it.
Lastly, last precision, let us stop good once for all with this
rotten phenomenon UFO which is only one rumour, a simple sociological
phenomenon. Pravda published a photograph of an alleged machine
having flown over the Iranian nuclear sites. It acts of a joke of bad
taste, or of a handling and one can only be astonished that this
Russian daily newspaper lent itself to such a joke whereas on April
first is still far. Everyone knows today that the UFOS are balloons
probes, or correspond to a bad interpretation of observations of
natural phenomena, even with lamentable hoaxes. But can be the
Russians and the Iranians need they to call upon such a pretext to
justify the reinforcement of their space matter co-operation.
Russia and Iran join their efforts vis-a-vis to a possible invasion
If those appeared in the Iranian sky they would be cut down at once
by a system of anti-aircraft defence.
Dbe not-identified flying objects continue to sow terror with the
Middle-East. Nobody can with the Juste what make with these objects
whereas it seems obvious that one cannot remain without reacting.
Russia and Iran decided to link their efforts to study this strange
phenomenon. This news could appear ridiculous with the first access,
but a bond appears between these appearances and the development of
the Iranian nuclear potential "the ufomania" prevails now in Iran.
The high command of the Iranian air forces recently gave the order to
cut down any penetrating suspect object in the airspace of the
country, by implementing all the anti-aircraft means available.
Lbe Iranian media insist more and more on the threat which these
objects could represent for the nuclear installations of the country.
The Resalat daily newspaper returned account owing to the fact that
the country had been flown over more and more frequently by these not
identified machines. According to this newspaper of the strange
luminous objects would have been seen with the top of Busher and
Natanza where are located nuclear installations. One of the witnesses
said that one of the objects "had exploded in the sky".
LE Iranian Defence Department tries to alleviate the anxiety of the
population vis-a-vis to this phenomenon. The General Qarim Gavani
specified that measures had been taken to protect the nuclear
installations from the country and that the Iranian air forces would
make owe them in the event of aggression. The interest for the
subject UFO has very quickly developed in Iran for one year. The news
services one makes state of dozen case where people claimed to have
seen UFOS passing to the top of their heads. The television of State
presented a sequence where one sees a brilliant disc flying over
Teheran. In eight cities of the country of many people left their
houses to contemplate very brilliant lights being detached on the
clouds. The INRA made state of multicoloured observations of objects
emitting of the green, red and purple rays around Tabriz and of
Ardebil, like with the top of the province of Golestan, close to the
Lhas Russia ensured Iran that it would bring its assistance to him if
this one were to fight UFOS. Russian is put a term at this problem,
with this anomaly at the beginning of the years four twenty ten, when
the whole of the population of Soviet Union started to panic in
connection with these strange objects. Iran and Russia stressed the
establishment of a bilateral collaboration, in particular for space
exploration and the placement of satellites. Apart from the Russo-
Iranians agreements made at the time of these problems of UFOS the
two countries collaborate for the launching of the Zohreh satellite.Posting Guidelines:
1. The orientation of this forum is scientific, with everything that implies. Reasoned and articulate criticism of ideas and theories is welcome.
2. The following are not allowed: personal attacks, gratuitous profanity, "kook" posts, and supernatural explanations.
3. Limit posts to those that are necessary and have substantive content. In general, no more than three per person per day.===========================================Hi Folks,I only had time to quickly skim through the above article, and could not see any references to the experiment causing low pitched hums.As far as I could see, it only made a small patch of visible activity, like Aurora Borealis.70Km up in the atmosphere, with presumably a highly focussed beam seems to me not to be a candidate for a source of The Hum.I would love to read an explanation of just how hums could be caused by this.I would expect most hums to be terrestrial, and from far less obscure phenomena, for possible inclusions in the search .R.M. Southampton, England.==============================================