Re: [hreg] Robert Jensen; are you an imbedded trouble-maker"
- Ahmad wrote:Why don't we rely on fossil fuel (oil, gas, coal & tar sands) until such time they run out or become expensive then we'll switch to renewable energy such as solar, wind, geothermal, etc.?Oil extracted from non-traditional sources IS more expensive to extract. That was the reason those of us in the renewable energy community were outraged when the 2005 Energy Bill was passed. Tens of billions of dollars were given to the oil/NG cartel, the nuclear industry and big coal. In the same bill, funding for renewable energy research was cut. The outrage was instant and loud. So much so that Pres. Bush made a big photo-op issue of meeting with NREL executives and "personally" increasing their federal funding - by levels less than the cuts.Tar sands mining requires tremendous amounts of energy to perform. The Canadian govt has approved a nuclear power plant to furnish electricity and heat, both vital to that specific type of production. So Mr. Petroleum Consultant, calculate the cost per barrel of crude oil from Canadian tar sands and include the cost of that nuclear generator.Besides, it's damn selfish to act as though you deserve to waste all the cheap oil and my grand-daughter will have to pay for much higher energy costs because the current political arrangement won't allow new technologies into the marketplace.By the way, the #1 importer of crude oil into the US is Canada.Jim DuncanNorth Texas Renewable Energy Inc
ntrei@...An article in this Sundays Fort Worth Star Telegram by Paul Krugman gave an entirely different perspective on the Hunt-Kurd oil deal. Unfortunately, it is not on their www site or I would post it. If anyone else can find it, please post it.----- Original Message -----From: Solar EnergySent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 9:00 AMSubject: [hreg] Robert Jensen; are you an imbedded trouble-maker"Robert, you seem to take rough shots at anyone you disagree with. Furthermore, you act as a moderator to steer away the discussions on important matters that impact our lives and the planet. I have just one question for you:Why should we be focusing only on renewable energy, when I know that fossil fuel (hydrocarbon fuel) is cheaper than any form of renewable energy? Why don't we rely on fossil fuel (oil, gas, coal & tar sands) until such time they run out or become expensive then we'll switch to renewable energy such as solar, wind, geothermal, etc.?AhmadRetired Petroleum Consultant
Robert Johnston <junk1@plastability. com> wrote:Renewable energy is a MUCH smaller field than energy in general, energy policy, and energy-related politics. If we want to discuss the broader field of energy, then I guess that is peoples choice, but then this is no longer a renewable energy discussion, and renewables will risk being lost in the blizzard of other stuff. That has already happened to some extent. I.e., I think if you were to do an audit of this groups discussions, one would conclude we were about global warming and left-wing politics as much as we are about renewable energy technology, maybe more so.Robert
From: hreg@yahoogroups. com [mailto:hreg@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Garth & Kim Travis
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2007 9:48 AM
To: hreg@yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: [hreg] That's itGreetings,
This group, as I understand it, is not just about renewable energy
technology, but renewable energy in general. I haven't censored these
messages due to the impact that you, yourself mention. A major change
in politics effects major changes in the energy supply which does impact
renewable energy in a big way.
This policy is open to change, if enough people want the posts
restricted. The openness of this list is partly due to the low number
of volunteers to moderate the list.
Robert Johnston wrote:
> I realize there are a lot of Bush-haters who subscribe to the HREG mail
> list, but what do these posts have to do with renewable energy,
> especially renewable energy technology?
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos more.
- One of the members of our Low Carbon Diet class said she hangs
clothes inside to dry. That provides the added benefit of
humidifying the house a little. A good thing to try for people who
haven't had luck drying outside. I myself, like Lunce, love those
ozone smelling sheets!
In email@example.com, Garth & Kim Travis <gartht@...> wrote:
> I haven't been to a meeting of HREG for a long time, but the green
> symposium last February sure made me sick, the majority of the
> were very fragrant. It would be wonderful if you are correct.another, since
> Bright Blessings,
> Ariel Thomann wrote:
> > Surely nobody on this list is still using those little sheets!
> > Ariel
> > - We are all Human beings here together. We have to help one
> > otherwise there is NO ONE who will help.Think ahead 7
> > - All countries need a NO REGRETS strategic energy policy.
> > generations.the poisonous
> > ------------------------------------
> >> Greetings,
> >> Well said Bashir. Not only that, they smell nice without using
> >> chemicals of dryer sheets.
> >> Bright Blessings,
> >> Kim