Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

RE: [hreg] Next HREG Meeting

Expand Messages
  • Steve Stelzer
    Dec 3 is better for me. Steve Stelzer ... From: James Ferrill [mailto:jferrill@ev1.net] Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 10:15 PM To: hreg@egroups.com Subject:
    Message 1 of 8 , Nov 20, 2000
    • 0 Attachment
      Dec 3 is better for me.

      Steve Stelzer

      -----Original Message-----
      From: James Ferrill [mailto:jferrill@...]
      Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 10:15 PM
      To: hreg@egroups.com
      Subject: Re: [hreg] Next HREG Meeting


      Dec 3 would be much better for me

      James Ferrill

      Jonathan Clemens wrote:

      > HREG, We are approaching our regularly scheduled General Meeting date
      > (November 26). Due to special circumstances, I would like to propose that
      > we move the meeting to December 3, the following Sunday. Our VP, Oral
      > Lafleur, will be out of town through November 27, the 26th is on
      > Thanksgiving weekend (many may be out of town), and the December 3 date is
      > good for our featured speaker, Mack Mansfield, from HL&P. A preliminary
      > agenda: 2:00 Open Discussion re: Jonathan's trip to
      > NREL re: Roundup Report, etc.2:30 Featured Speaker - Mack
      > Mansfield (HL&P) re: Deregulation and related impacts
      > re: PV in the electric industry3:30 Business Items - Planning (website
      > update, etc.)4:00 Wrap-up To be fair, I am putting this proposed date
      > change to a vote. Regardless of the outcome, I will be glad to hold a
      > meeting on Sunday November 26, but the logistics will be difficult without
      > Oral around to open up the meeting room (2nd floor of the School of
      > Technology at TSU). So, I presume the date change to December 3 is
      > acceptable unless I hear from any of you that the change is a problem. In
      > the absence of positive support for the December 3 meeting date, I will
      make
      > arrangements for a November 26 meeting. I see the process going this way.
      > First, members voice problems with the change. Second, if other members
      see
      > the problems, they may offer up support for the December 3 date. Third,
      > with lack of support for the change (that is, with a preponderance of
      > support for keeping the original date), I will proceed with the scheduled
      > date of November 26. In legal schmegal terms, preponderance means more so
      > than not. That is, if 50% or more of the comments support the 26th, then
      we
      > stay with it. Thank you. Jonathan A. Clemens(281) 335-1155
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.