Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Re: [hreg] Next HREG Meeting

Expand Messages
  • John A Fields
    Please take me off the mailing list. Thank you. John
    Message 1 of 8 , Nov 19, 2000
      Please take me off the mailing list.
      Thank you.
      John
    • Steve Stelzer
      Dec 3 is better for me. Steve Stelzer ... From: James Ferrill [mailto:jferrill@ev1.net] Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 10:15 PM To: hreg@egroups.com Subject:
      Message 2 of 8 , Nov 20, 2000
        Dec 3 is better for me.

        Steve Stelzer

        -----Original Message-----
        From: James Ferrill [mailto:jferrill@...]
        Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 10:15 PM
        To: hreg@egroups.com
        Subject: Re: [hreg] Next HREG Meeting


        Dec 3 would be much better for me

        James Ferrill

        Jonathan Clemens wrote:

        > HREG, We are approaching our regularly scheduled General Meeting date
        > (November 26). Due to special circumstances, I would like to propose that
        > we move the meeting to December 3, the following Sunday. Our VP, Oral
        > Lafleur, will be out of town through November 27, the 26th is on
        > Thanksgiving weekend (many may be out of town), and the December 3 date is
        > good for our featured speaker, Mack Mansfield, from HL&P. A preliminary
        > agenda: 2:00 Open Discussion re: Jonathan's trip to
        > NREL re: Roundup Report, etc.2:30 Featured Speaker - Mack
        > Mansfield (HL&P) re: Deregulation and related impacts
        > re: PV in the electric industry3:30 Business Items - Planning (website
        > update, etc.)4:00 Wrap-up To be fair, I am putting this proposed date
        > change to a vote. Regardless of the outcome, I will be glad to hold a
        > meeting on Sunday November 26, but the logistics will be difficult without
        > Oral around to open up the meeting room (2nd floor of the School of
        > Technology at TSU). So, I presume the date change to December 3 is
        > acceptable unless I hear from any of you that the change is a problem. In
        > the absence of positive support for the December 3 meeting date, I will
        make
        > arrangements for a November 26 meeting. I see the process going this way.
        > First, members voice problems with the change. Second, if other members
        see
        > the problems, they may offer up support for the December 3 date. Third,
        > with lack of support for the change (that is, with a preponderance of
        > support for keeping the original date), I will proceed with the scheduled
        > date of November 26. In legal schmegal terms, preponderance means more so
        > than not. That is, if 50% or more of the comments support the 26th, then
        we
        > stay with it. Thank you. Jonathan A. Clemens(281) 335-1155
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.