Why not just get rid of the congress then?
Just keep the treasury department and get rid of the
congress all together if our country is to be
completely run by capitalism.
I mean we're pretty much at that stage already right?
So just let the "consumer" dictate the outcome of life
and everything, because that has worked out so well
for us so far.
You want to know the sole purpose of the as you so put
it "corporate operations"?
It is to make money. That's it. That is it's absolute
only purpose of existence.
It's not to improve quality of life. It's not to
create a better world or to have harmony amongst our
species. Although sometimes these are circumstancial
bi-products, 99.9% of the time, the main driving force
behind a corporate operation is to sell the product
thay have in their hand and make money.
And as we've all seen in the past and up to today,
corporate operations with little to no supervision
fueled by consumers has alwayshad great outcomes.
Let's think about some of the examples
....well I could write a list that goes on for pages.
Thus leading me to the subject matter of automobiles
Besides the catalytic converter and the seat belt, the
car has not had any real supervision and it's
transformation of what it is today has been driven by
As I said earlier, the corporate operations only
purpose is to make money. And even with the enormous
attention to global warming, gas, etc etc, there is a
reason that air polluting, gas guzzling SUV's and
Pickup trucks that literally get 12 miles to the
gallon are still being sold by the millions.... .....
So though anarchism and barterism would be the most
ideal form of life for humanity, it is simply not in
our nature as a whole and we need authoratative roles
to keep oursleves from complete self-destruction. In
so many levels, we've already come to understand this,
which gave birth to government.
Our government, though very extrememly flawed because
as one great quote says "power corrupts" is still a
phenomenal body of work that we humans created to help
give all people under it's system an equal chance at
living....it is capitalism that has actually twisted
and deformed it into the monster. and what keeps
feeding the capital beast?
us...the consumer.... .
consumers dictating the outcome of humanity?
I just don't see a good outcome of that.
--- Robert Johnston <junk1@plastability. com>
> This is so wrong. Congress is the last organization w:st="on"> China .
> I want to see
> micromanaging vehicle design and corporate
> operations. Might as well shut
> down Detroit and send all the jobs to
> On Behalf Of Solar
> If we believe we need to legislate conservation,
> wouldn't it be better to
> simply charge a large gasoline tax and then let the
> market dictate car
> design according to consumer demand?
> From: hreg@yahoogroups. com
> [mailto:hreg@yahoogroups. com]
> Energy- The groundbreaking deal in Congress to
> Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 11:24 PM
> To: hreg@yahoogroups. com
> Subject: [hreg] Automakers adding more MPG to new
> Energy plan pushes automakers on mpg
> By KEN THOMAS, Associated Press Writer
> raise mile-per-gallonlawmakers secured an extension of the
> standards will compel the auto industry to churn out
> more fuel-efficient
> vehicles on a faster timeline than the companies
> wanted, though with
> flexibility to get the job done.
> The auto industry's fleet of new cars, sport utility
> vehicles, pickup trucks
> and vans will have to average 35 mpg by 2020,
> according to the agreement
> that congressional negotiators announced late
> Friday. That compares with the
> 2008 requirement of 27.5 mpg average for cars and
> 22.5 mpg for light trucks.
> It would be first increase ordered by Congress in
> three decades.
> Majority Democrats plan to include the requirement
> in broader energy
> legislation to be debated in the context of
> $90-per-barrel oil, $3-plus pump
> prices and growing concerns about climate change.
> The House plans to begin
> debate this week.
> "It is a major milestone and the first concrete
> legislation to address
> global warming," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein,
> While Senate Democrats were quick to embrace the
> compromise, the energy bill
> may face problems over requirements for nonpublic
> electric utilities to
> produce 15 percent of their power from renewable
> energy sources such as wind
> or solar.
> Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., on Saturday said that
> idea "will make this bill
> untenable for many in the Senate."
> Environmentalists have sought stricter mileage
> standards for years, saying
> that is the most effective way to curb greenhouse
> gas emissions and oil
> The energy bill will help accelerate plans by
> automakers to bring more
> fuel-efficient technologies to conventional engines
> and alternatives such as
> gas-electric hybrids and vehicles running on ethanol
> blends. For the first
> time, for example, manufacturers will receive
> credits for building vehicles
> running on biodiesel fuel.
> Domestic automakers and Toyota Motor Corp.
> vehemently opposed a Senate bill
> approved passed in June that contained the same
> mileage requirements and
> timeline. They warned the measure would limit the
> choice of vehicles,
> threaten jobs and drive up costs.
> The companies backed an alternative of 32 mpg to 35
> mpg by 2022. At the
> time, Chrysler LLC executive Tom LaSorda told
> employees the Senate bill
> would "add up to a staggering $6,700 - almost a 40
> percent increase - to the
> cost of every Chrysler vehicle."
> But the compromise worked out by Rep. John Dingell,
> D-Mich., House Speaker
> Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Senate leaders,
> maintains a significant boost in
> mileage standards while giving the industry more
> flexibility and certainty
> as they plan new vehicles.
> The proposal would continue separate standards for
> cars and trucks, extend
> credits for producing vehicles that run on ethanol
> blends, and allow
> automakers to receive separate credits for exceeding
> the standards and then
> apply those credits to other model years.
> current 1.2 mpg credit for w:st="on">Toyota has
> the production of each "flexible fuel" vehicle,
> capable of running on
> ethanol blends of 15 percent gasoline and 85 percent
> ethanol. Without the
> extension, the credits may have run out by 2010, but
> under the deal, they
> will be phased out by 2020.
> The United Auto Workers union also won a provision
> intended to prevent
> companies from shifting production of less
> profitable small cars to overseas
> plants. At stake are an estimated 17,000 jobs.
> The House's energy bill, approved in August, did not
> include mileage
> standards, and lawmakers had worked since then to
> include them.
> Rick Wagoner, General Motors Corp.'s chairman and
> chief executive, said the
> new rules would "pose a significant technical and
> economic challenge to the
> industry." He said GM would tackle the changes "with
> an array of
> engineering, research and development resources."
> GM, Chrysler and Ford Motor Co. have announced plans
> to double their
> production by 2010 of flex-fuel vehicles.
> said it will bring thehas dominated the market with
> option to the Tundra pickup.
> Among hybrids, Toyota
> the Prius, but severalTry
> automakers are beginning to bring the technology to
> large SUVs and pickups.
> Environmental groups estimate the deal would save
> the country 1.2 million
> barrels of oil per day by 2020 while helping
> motorists save at the pump.
> "Cars are going to be more attractive to consumers
> because they won't cost
> as much to own and operate," said David Doniger,
> director of the climate
> center for the Natural Resources Defense Council.
> Be a better sports nut! Let your teams follow you
> with Yahoo Mobile .
><http://us.rd. yahoo.com/ evt=51731/ *http:/mobile. yahoo.com/ sports;_ylt= At9_qD
> KvtAbMuh1G1SQtBI7nt AcJ%0d%0a> it now.____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _
Be a better sports nut! Let your teams follow you
with Yahoo Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile. yahoo.com/ sports;_ylt= At9_qDKvtAbMuh1G 1SQtBI7ntAcJ