2876RE: Oh Politics! RE: [hreg] crash science initiative for alternative energy and conservation
- Jan 6, 20052 points:Note the land area required for solar energy in Richard Smalley's presentation.I like PV too, but solar thermal is even farther along in terms of cost competitiveness (large scale). It is one of the most cost-effective renewable power technologies, with present power generation costs of US¢12-20/kWh and long-term costs of US¢5-10/kWh. Source: Renewable Energy World-----Original Message-----
From: Roxanne Boyer [mailto:rox1@...]
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: Oh Politics! RE: [hreg] crash science initiative for alternative energy and conservationMr. Malone,I quite dissagree with you on many of these issues, and so do most scientists. Read any of the articles today on energy in Scientific American, Physics Today, Discovery, Science, .... and you will find that our current oil consumption trends can only be sustained to about 2050, plus or minus 20 years. Renewable energy is growing exponencially. Europe is aiming for 20% renewables by 2020. I believe many of the US States already have similar goals and many more will join in as time goes on. There will be a change within the next lifespan.Even the "Oil" companies realize this and have published reports that say so. They are starting to call themselves "Energy" companies and investing quite heavily in renewable energy. See Shell Solar, Shell Wind, Shell Renewables, BP Solar, GE Solar, GE Wind, for example. And if the oil companies don't lead, the electronics companies will. Sharp is already the leading manufacturer of solar cells.I don't know how you did your math about not enough solar energy in New Jersey (is that the state with the highest energy to land ratio and the least sunny state?). But the math I have done shows that I can supply all of my Houston household electrical needs (averaged) by covering half of my roof with solar panels. No breakthrough technology needed; it already exists. If you trend retail electric prices and solar PV prices, you will see the cost cross in the year 2025 - then it will be more economical to buy PV than grid electricity!If you read up on the technical progress of photoelectrics, you will see incredible breakthroughs in the last 10 years. Right now, solar cells are expensive because production can not keep up with demand. And new record breaking production facillities are being opened each year.If you want a "heart felt" change, read the July-August issue of Renewable Energy World each year and see the growth of RE for yourself. It is amazing. Maybe we can discuss some of the facts at the next HREG meeting, Sunday, 2:00pm, Jan 30th at TSU.Sincerely,Chris----- Original Message -----From: J. P. MaloneSent: Monday, January 03, 2005 8:43 PMSubject: RE: Oh Politics! RE: [hreg] crash science initiative for alternative energy and conservation
All this discussion is interesting and heart felt. The following is not intended as a rant, but to put our problem in perspective.
Our government, both parties, is so tied to big oil money, .
It would take solar panels covering every square inch of the state of New Jersey just to equal the energy used in New Jersey. So the size of the oil dependency is almost beyond our reason.
A breakthrough, one not foreseeable by current science is most likely the only hope in the US. Outside the US there may be some help because of the different mind set of the non US-Oil cartel.
China is graduating more engineers & scientists each year than the US graduates all college students of all degree fields. China has a massive energy problem. They also have a growing economy that it partly controlled & partly free market. As they inevitably pass the US number of educated citizens (check out our schools systems if you doubt this) and the controlling government forces capital & research in to alternative energy research because of their vast needs and lack of resources they may turn this thing around.
I hope I live long enough to see the beginning.
In the interim, conservation, voting, getting activity in politics may be the only drop in the bucket we have. I hope Im wrong.
J. Patrick Malone
From: Robert Johnston [mailto:junk1@...]
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 7:36 PM
Subject: RE: Oh Politics! RE: [hreg] crash science initiative for alternative energy and conservation
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>