Holy Rule for Nov. 1
Our Emma will be coming home to Enumclaw, Washington this week until Dec
11th when she moves into Children's Hospital to begin the rehab. She is still
in need of prayerful protection as she has a blood infection that is
treatable but a hassle. Emma will need daily wound care which she will get in
Enumclaw; keep her family in prayer as they assume the primary care giver role for
everything else over the next couple of weeks.
Prayers, please, for Bobbie. She has had cancer for 8 years, and has just
been moved to a hospice, for her happy death and eternal rest, whenever God
calls her and for all her family and those caring for her, and those who care
for all our prayer folks. Pat, in her 80's, who is in the last stages of throat
cancer and for her large family especially Christine. Prayers for two
marriages in great crisis and all their families. Eternal rest for Trisha's Mom
and her deceased family members. Prayers for her son, John, last recital before
University graduation, and that Trisha may attend. Prayers for Barb,
leukemia. She's been through all the chemo they can do, and is now hospitalized with
a serious infection, lots of pain in her leg and foot, and internal bleeding.
Prayers for the happy death and eternal rest of Fred, who died in a one car
accident, possibly having had a heart attack. His wife, Eva, was driving
behind him with her car when it happened. Prayers for her, their children and
grandchildren and all the family and those who mourn him. Lord, help us all as
You know and will. God's will is best. All is mercy and grace. God is never
absent, praise Him! Thanks so much. JL
+++++++++In yesterday's reflection, I said that there were times when we
NOT correct. Indeed, there are, but I should have fine-tuned it a bit more.
There are situations in which one is morally obliged to say something, where
one's silence could actually be complicity. Gentleness and courtesy and love
still the norm here, but one can actually harm another by not mentioning
sinful matters. Careful assessments must be made as to whom, when and how it
best to approach the matter, but we cannot excuse ourselves by shrugging it
saying we are not "detached" enough to correct. That might be true in
issues that are not seriously sinful, but it is not true in grave moral
When in doubt, ask a pastor or spiritual director or confessor to help you
March 2, July 2, November 1
Chapter 25: On Weightier Faults
Let the brother who is guilty of a weightier fault
be excluded both from the table and from the oratory.
Let none of the brethren join him
either for company or for conversation.
Let him be alone at the work assigned him,
abiding in penitential sorrow
and pondering that terrible sentence of the Apostle
where he says that a man of that kind is handed over
for the destruction of the flesh,
that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord (1 Cor. 5:5).
Let him take his meals alone
in the measure and at the hour
which the Abbot shall consider suitable for him.
He shall not be blessed by those who pass by,
nor shall the food that is given him be blessed.
OK, here's a meditation that fits the feast today: How many of those
Saints we are celebrating today once found themselves under this
stringent punishment and now find themselves in heaven's bliss?
Probably more than one or two! Punishments like this are a wake-up
call. Not everyone will take that call, but no doubt many who are
whooping it up in heaven today would gladly give witness to the
wisdom of doing so!
Saints are perfected, not perfect. The final product is very
different from any point that came before. Punishments like those
today's chapter suggests are dreadful as end points, but they are not
at all so as wake-up calls, as points on the way. On the contrary, in
such cases they can have great beauty. "Amazing Grace, how sweet the
We have different ways of giving wake-up calls today. I remember a
priest whose Abbot walked unannounced into his rectory and
said: "Pack a bag, Father, you are going into treatment for alcohol
today at Guest House. Right now!" In his case, as in so many, that
drastic step worked, thanks be to God. That priest died a very
The error, however, and it is often made out of cowardice, is not to
give ANY wake-up calls at all. Dump the penal code in the Holy Rule
and let the failing monastics figure it out for themselves. This
approach is utterly wrong.
In the first place, it woefully fails charity. Genuine love often
obliges us to do unpalatable things. To shirk that demand is terribly
wrong. Secondly, the monastic mired in whatever delusion of sin or
illness of addiction has, more often than not, lost the ability to
see clearly. That's what the community and superior must do for such
a monastic. To fail to help such a one to awaken to the Light that is
there for all is a horrible thing.
We must always remember that Christ came to call the sinners, not
simply the just. We can pay a lot of lip service to that concept
without realizing that it could be rendered as: "Christ came to call
those monastics who need excommunication, not those who don't." Get
the picture? The ones we most roundly judge (in spite of Jesus'
insistence that we never do so!) are the ones for whom He came. To
deny them any opportunity to wake up and get with the program is
awfully short of genuine love.
St. Benedict himself says that he wrote his Holy Rule "for
beginners." Well, folks, check out any skating rink and watch the
beginners there. You won't have any trouble figuring out who they
are. Their arms are awkwardly outstretched in futile attempts at
balance. They wobble, they're clumsy and inept. They fall down a LOT.
To assume that, in our brave new world, all monastics have lost that
clumsy ineptitude of beginners is a tragic mistake. We are all
beginners and we will all die beginners. That's just the way the
monastic struggle is. Daily we begin again... as the title of one commentary
on the Holy Rule says!
Love and prayers,
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]