41683Re: Question to Authors
- Nov 4, 2003
> I'm not a lawyer, so I don't know how it would bepossible/acceptable
> for Canada to have its own "fair use" (or whatever it's called) toInternational agreements are useless unless they are put into law in
> supercede/amend the Berne Convention.
the countries that sign. Take the Berne Convention, for example.
The agreement, like all other international "laws," is not law at
all. It is up to the individual countries to make it law within
their own governments. All of these countries have the right, as
sovereign states, to makes changes to the agreement in their own laws
as they see fit. There is nothing forcing Canada to have copyright
laws of its own except a desire to maintain good faith with other
governments. China, which finds it unnecessary to maintain this good
faith, has no copyright laws at all.
Canada has very lenient copyright laws. Napster, for example, was
and still is 100% legal in Canada, as is Kazaa and any other file-
sharing software, as long as the user downloads only and never
uploads. The law in Canada is as follows: I can copy my own cd for
personal use; I can make my own cd available for you to copy (this is
what file-downloading is considered); I CANNOT copy my own cd and
give it to you (this is what file-uploading is considered). The
United States had a similar law in the early '90s regarding cassette
copies, but appears to have made an about-face regarding mp3s, which
is a shame. Mp3s are generally of poor quality. It's always better
to have the cd, but if you can't hear the mp3s first to make a
decision you're a lot less likely to buy the cd.
- << Previous post in topic