Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

[hockeydisk] Re: for Eric

Expand Messages
  • Brett Hall
    ... However, I did notice there was one player who wound up with a SOG+ rating of 2 (the minimum is 3) because of this. I m not sure if that was intended or
    Message 1 of 4 , Sep 5, 1999
    • 0 Attachment
      > It's not an error, it was changed on purpose. Hatcher barely played at LD
      > last year, and was consistently rated RD only in the past. In the past,
      > he would not have received an LD rating at all. What we did this year is
      > give those guys a rating at the lesser position, but with decreased
      > effectiveness (lower Sh, lower Def). That's also why you'll see some guys
      > rated at a position but with a Def=0, like Mogilny at center.

      However, I did notice there was one player who wound up with a
      SOG+ rating of 2 (the minimum is 3) because of this. I'm not sure
      if that was intended or not.

      Brett

      St. Louis Mustangs (GHMHL)
      St. Louis Sting (WWAHL)
      St. Louis Ice Lords (NWHL)
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.