- Ok, we re at about 85% or so on the reviews. I got a number of big files this week, which really helped. Thanks to those that took the time to do reviews.Message 1 of 33 , Aug 18, 2007View SourceOk, we're at about 85% or so on the reviews. I got a number of big files
this week, which really helped. Thanks to those that took the time to do
We're one review short on about 6 teams....but I still know someone
working the whole league, so that will quickly fix that problem. We are
2 reviews short on PHO and STL. So, if someone out there could do a
review on either or both of these teams and send them to me (provided
you haven't done them already), I'd appreciate it. I think we'll be
closing down the reviews in the next couple days....so if you are
working on any, send in what you have in the next day or so....anything
helps, but we appear that we'll make our minimums pretty easily. Thanks!!!
- Just a quick update.....testing is rolling along quite well. It has been a challenging year with the short season. Much more variability in the test numbers.Message 33 of 33 , Sep 3, 2013View SourceJust a quick update.....testing is rolling along quite well. It has been
a challenging year with the short season. Much more variability in the
test numbers. Larger sample sizes (more games) makes the statistics
cleaner and the numbers converge easier....not true this year. Good to
know that the new CBA will keep us from going through this again for the
next 8 years. We'll do what we can to get the disk to converge to
reasonable numbers, then do the final updating before release.
Release date is still TBD, depending on test results, but it will get
out before the NHL season starts. I was hoping to get it out earlier
this year, with the voting system helping get ratings faster, but the
short season variability has used up that extra time with extra test runs.