4405Re: [hockeydisk] Committees for 08-09 disk
- Apr 8, 2009I was involved in 2 groups with Herb and didn't feel there was any bias on his part. He steered the groups through the process and listened to all discussion. Certainly if he felt strongly enough on something he stood his ground, but so did the rest of us.
From: Dave Atkinson <boomhound@...>
Sent: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 8:40 pm
Subject: Re: [hockeydisk] Committees for 08-09 disk
I like this open discussion. I like getting the issues out on the
table. I want to weigh in on this, but I'm traveling and typing this
on a blackberry. I'll wait til I get home to a real keyboard to jump
in. I was glad to see the email from Bill with concerns.... .. I lwant
to keep this process transparent, so I'll address that. The rating
teams are valuable and I still like that approach, it's just last year
had out of control issues that Herb mentioned. Look at this as a
tweak, not a total change. I expect lots of changes to the base rating
On 4/7/09, Andy Bartalone <buffalo@guisarme. net> wrote:
> Bill and anyone else that may have this concern.
>> ? There was an impression amongst some in the apba community last time
> where "Herb won all ties." That is, in the vast majority of cases
> where a ratings team or representative disagreed with you on a
> rating, your ratings usually prevailed. I understand the impossible
> nature of trying to please everyone and still generate an accurate
> I worked with Herb on 7 teams last season and I did not see anything like
> *Herb won all ties*. We had an honest discourse on each and every one came
> to decisions based on a multitude of things, but it was definitely NOT
> *Herb won all ties*, I actually think that it was about 60/40 in my favor.
> Just saying.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>