Yes, knowing is an issue. But the issue I raise is what is it that we know when we know the absolute speculatively. It is certainly not the god of religiousponikvaraj
Good. You can count. But I asked for quotes from the quote master. Can you give me a quote? You should realize why you are in trouble by now. I have read theponikvaraj
I have been insistent that we be careful about language. Terms have one sense when employed formally and another when employed speculatively. One key featureponikvaraj
only of those topics related to G.W.F.Hegel
and his philosophy.
A (rather lengthy) draft for a mission statement can be found here.
It is aimed to provide a scientific level of
discussion. Participants are expected to show a respectfull and scientific attitude both to Hegel and to each other. The usual "netiquette" as well as scientific standards apply.
The complete list rules can be found here.
Of course the list also serves for the exchange on books and articles, congresses, magazines, seminars etc., as long as they are related to Hegel.
This list belongs to the lists of hegel.net (created 1997) and its Wiki.
A complete list of the mailing lists at hegel.Net with possibility to subscribe online can be found here.
If you have Hegel related questions or want to learn about Hegel, please see also our FAQ and our Hegel biography.
Messages can be posted in English or German.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify the mails of this list under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version, published by the Free Software Foundation.
The mails are also licensed under a Creative Commons License and
under the Creative Commons Developing Nations license.
- Oct 15, 1998
- This is a public group.
- Attachments are not permitted.
- Members cannot hide email address.
- Listed in Yahoo Groups directory.
- Membership does not require approval.
- Messages from new members require approval.
- All members can post messages.