Attention: Starting December 14, 2019 Yahoo Groups will no longer host user created content on its sites. New content can no longer be uploaded after October 28, 2019. Sending/Receiving email functionality is not going away, you can continue to communicate via any email client with your group members. Learn More
To anyone who might know of some further reading;
replies to 'What is the Real Julius Ceasar' 1910-11
in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society;
it seems the finite centre is not a self as no amount
of conditioning can account for the conditions
which make the self the self.
In this way it seems Bradley has gone further
than Hegel's reduction or negation of the soul
(being finite like the duality of Aquinas' substance
which being in time is also preserved for eternity?)
to the spirit or mind being infinite.
Of course this is rough, but any corrections or
contributions welcome.
Paul Healey
- Perhaps McTaggart on the "Hegelian Cosmology", 1901, ch. 2?Stephen.
To: hegel@yahoogroups.com
From: hegel@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 13:46:50 -0800
Subject: [hegel] Bradley's Self and the Finite Centre
To anyone who might know of some further reading;
replies to 'What is the Real Julius Ceasar' 1910-11
in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society;
it seems the finite centre is not a self as no amount
of conditioning can account for the conditions
which make the self the self.
In this way it seems Bradley has gone further
than Hegel's reduction or negation of the soul
(being finite like the duality of Aquinas' substance
which being in time is also preserved for eternity?)
to the spirit or mind being infinite.
Of course this is rough, but any corrections or
contributions welcome.
Paul Healey