Attention: Starting December 14, 2019 Yahoo Groups will no longer host user created content on its sites. New content can no longer be uploaded after October 28, 2019. Sending/Receiving email functionality is not going away, you can continue to communicate via any email client with your group members. Learn More
- Jun 7, 2003In response to the Fri06Jun03 post by Maurizio Canfora:
> Has it ever touched your mind the idea that probably 100
That is a good point, Maurizio, taken from Hegel himself.
> dollars, a unicorn, a Ferrari, etc. are all not the same thing
> than "God"?
The difference between the finite and true infinity is one
of the key points of Hegel's System.
> This brings us back to the necessity of a definition of
Yes, of course.
> the term "God".
> If "God" is nothing else but the representation of Spirit,
Another good point, Maurizio.
> of the dialectical unity of being and thought reconciled
> with itself, then the ontological argument re-acquires
> all its validity.
> Hegel does not reject Kant's argument that having
And that is precisely the point, Maurizio. Thank you
> 100 dollars in my mind does not make me richer.
> But "100 dollars" are not the same as "God".
for putting it so succinctly.
> The entire philosophy of Hegel is the fascinating
I agree entirely, Maurizio. The Kantian paradigm has
> attempt to show the inconsistency of a dualist form
> of knowledge. Trying to have Hegel corrected by
> Kant is like trying to have Einstein corrected by
> Newton.
>
> Ciao,
> Maurizio Canfora
had its day -- it is beginning to slowly phase out. Yet
it will take a long time, I think, for Hegel's genius to
finally become common sense.
Kant's riddle of the100 dollars missed the point. The
question about God is a question about the Whole,
about the Truly Infinite. Therefore no example from
the finite world can possibly do it justice. All examples
from the finite world will sharply distinguish between
the solid thing and the mental image picture of the thing.
However, when it comes to the Whole, the True Infinite,
the mental image picture of the Whole bursts asunder.
The Atheist is obliged to *prove* his implied position
that God can only be regarded as a finite object that
only appears in the imagination.
As Hegel said -- what the Atheist calls Religion and
what Hegel calls Religion are two different things.
Best regards,
--Paul Trejo - << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>