Re: Chris's thoughts on Preferred Stores and other topics
- --- In email@example.com, "chrisant_wa <chrisant@p...>" <chrisant@p...> wrote:
> --- "vr8ce <vr8ce@y...>" <vr8ce@y...> wrote:I suspect we're discussing semantics; I detailed in the sentences that follow the one you quoted what I was referring to. Call it functionality loss if you prefer. Regardless of what we call it, the program no longer functions the same way the next time you make a trip, without you going in and restoring all of those checkmarks. That's loss of ... whatever word you prefer. :)
> > > Some people said basically "removing check marks from some
> > > stores is loss of information because then we don't know
> > > what stores the item is _available_ at versus where I'm
> > > currently willing to purchase it". If you enable per-store
> > > prices and enter an aisle or price for that store then
> > > there isn't information loss.
> > ... yes there is information loss. :) ... we do lose what
> > stores that item is available in.
> How do you lose that information? I said if you enter an aisle or
> price for that store then there isn't information loss. The reason
> is because the fact that there is an aisle/price for that store
> implies that the item is available at that store. The only way
> that is not true is if you are entering aisle/price information for
> stores where the item is not available. If that's the case, I
> would be interested to know why.
> // chris