Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

18583Re: [Hammock Camping] update PeaPod experience

Expand Messages
  • billybob38801
    Jan 7, 2008
      That must have been JustJeff's PeaPod hood. It is a good idea. I have
      a very lofty separate Marmot hood that I can use for that purpose,
      though I have not tried it yet. It even has some velcro around the
      neck area that might match up with the scratchy side PeaPod Velcro.

      Also, if I was expecting consistent temps this cold(10*) or colder, I
      might use a light summer mummy bag, as I already do( winter weight
      though) when it's really cold and I'm in my HH SuperShelter. Then the
      hood and draft collar make any neck draft problem go away. Yes, I know
      it stinks trying to get in a mummy bag in a hammock, but I can do it
      now with minimal stuggle. And my experience has been that nothing is
      competitive with a mummy's hood/collar heat sealing abilities.

      But in this test, that "cool shoulders" due to a poor quilt fit pretty
      much disappeared when I closed the pod down from a 3-6 or so inch
      opening to all the way closed. There was a quick warm up then. Yes, I
      know, I worry about the condensation in the pod also. But I didn't
      really see any that was enough to decrease loft. There was a bit of
      dampness in the area just above my face, but again, there was still
      plenty of loft. But I wouldn't want to do this unless I could count on
      some sunshine to dry out the pod.

      I'm thinking we might be able to get away with this because of the
      Velcro closure? ( wild guess)IOW, since there is no draft tube, the
      pod's closure, even when fully closed, is relatively open compared to
      a zipper, especially with a draft tube.

      This MIGHT be just enough super breathable area ( no down in the way)
      to allow most moisture to escape around/thru the Velco, without having
      to go thru the down first and possibly condensing there?

      Anybody here with lot's of experience fully closing the pod in really
      cold weather? Do you have much trouble with wet down, as we would
      normally expect?

      --- In hammockcamping@yahoogroups.com, "David Fox" <amendment2@...> wrote:
      > I remember reading that you got cold around your shoulders and I was
      > thinking I saw a pretty cool hood with Velcro that just attached to the
      > peapod so there was no actual opening open to the air. As I remember
      it, you
      > got into the hammock, closed the peapod up a bit, stuck your head
      into the
      > polar fleece hood so that your face was exhaling out of the peapod
      but the
      > hood kept out drafts. Looked cool to me.
      > From: hammockcamping@yahoogroups.com
      > On Behalf Of billybob38801
      > Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 9:10 AM
      > To: hammockcamping@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: Re: [Hammock Camping] update PeaPod experience
      > Hmm, it took me a minute to picture what you were saying, but I think
      > you are on to something. Best of both worlds. It would, of course, be
      > even more expensive than the normal PeaPod, but I guess no more so
      > than a Snugfit plus a separate top quilt or two No Snivelers. I'm
      > still looking forward to seeing some temp reports on the Snugfit.
      > Though I'm still hoping I can get it adjusted just right. Once I do,
      > I'll just leave it in place. But what's amazing to me is how well I
      > did with a less than optimum ( apparently ) adjustment. Basically, at
      > least as good as rated, I believe. I mean, a summer weight bag as
      > quilt, some warm clothing( I've used more, believe me!)and a space
      > blanket, and I am adequate at 10* with a wind chill between 0* and 5*,
      > without any pads? What competing single product can beat that, even
      > with a perfect adjustment? I'm impressed. After all, I'm not
      > Mr.Antifreeze blood, AKA Neo!
      > This thing is not perfect for me, and I hate that I can't use it with
      > my HH, for example, and it won't necessarily replace all of my other
      > means of keeping warm in a hammock. BUT, there is something just
      > super efficient about this thing when it comes to hammock warmth. My
      > impression is that reports I've seen with separate UQs plus top quilts
      > don't show as much warmth? And I can understand that on top, since I
      > added a thin quilt, which adds weight. But that shouldn't effect the
      > bottom warmth.
      > Maybe it is the effect of being sealed in, like a mummy bag? Which
      > might be even more efficient using my separate Marmot hood outside the
      > pod, with the pod sealed around my neck.
      > I also wonder if being sealed in, with loft closing all around the
      > side/top edges, decreases any cooling effect of small air gaps and
      > less than perfect fit underneath? I can see where it would decrease
      > any effect from breezes or air circulation, that might be more of a
      > problem with quilts top and bottom? I don't know, just guessing about
      > why this product seems to be warmer than you would think when
      > comparing it to similar products, weight wise and rated loft wise.
      > Of course, I really kind of expected ( no, let's say "hoped for")
      > this. Due to having PMed a couple PeaPod users, who don't post very
      > much on the forums. Folks who had reported super good results with
      > their PeaPods on the trail. In all cases, better than rated for the
      > PeaPod they were using.
      > --- In hammockcamping@yahoogroups.com
      > <mailto:hammockcamping%40yahoogroups.com> , tim garner <slowhike@>
      > >
      > > maybe ed & dave need to come up w/ a section that covers the top of
      > the hammock by velcroing to the snugfit quilt??? that may be just
      > about ideal.
      > >
      > >
      > > billybob38801 <billybob38801@> wrote:
      > > I thought I should post my most recent results in some real cold a
      > > couple of nights back.
      > >
      > > First, let me say that I am still having minor difficulties adjusting
      > > the "loft compression vs no air gap" conflict. IOW, it seems that if I
      > > adjust the PeaPod sag any where near where the pod barely contacts the
      > > hammock bottom with me in it- or even with a small gap, then I don't
      > > seem to have full loft right under my butt. So, I'm still working on
      > > that, and so far I can't quite figure it out. Also, I would like to
      > > know, if I can't have a very close fit without some loss of loft, then
      > > which should I sacrifice? Would I be better off with a air gap of an
      > > inch or two under my lowest point, and have full loft? Or the reverse,
      > > better off with a "snugfit" and some loss of loft of an inch or so?
      > >
      > > I should also say that I am probably an average sleeper temp wise. I
      > > used to be very hot natured, warm sleeper. But as I have gotten
      older, I
      > > definitely have much less tolerance for the cold. So, maybe I am now
      > > about in the middle, but who knows?
      > >
      > > Any way, the forecast low was 14-16*F. It was 11PM when I hung the
      > > hammock and put on the PeaPod by head lamp. Really quite easy to do, I
      > > just adjusted it for about the same distance from end knots as some
      > > previous experiments had shown to be correct. I was using a structural
      > > ridge line for consistent hang. Then I hung my tarp. It was
      already 19*,
      > > and by the time I did this I was starting to get quite a chill. There
      > > was also a bit of a wind chill all night, probably and additional
      5* or
      > > a bit more.
      > >
      > > So, I hopped in and Velcroed up. I had on light thin long johns, 1
      > > of medium wool socks with liner socks and vapor barrier on
      standby, neck
      > > gator, hat and Bozeman Mountain Works Cocoon Polargard pants ( 8 ozs )
      > > and hooded jacket ( 14 ozs.) that I had used on previous tests without
      > > quilt. But this time I added a 25 year old quallofil summer bag that
      > > has about 1-1.25 " SINGLE layer loft, used as quilt. The original
      > > was either 40* or 50*, I don't remember. And sense it was already 1*
      > > below the PeaPod's rating, I added a 2 oz space blanket to the pod,
      > > which covered the bottom and well up the sides of the hammock. I
      > > the Velcro down to about a 6" opening above my face, got on the
      > > a bit and tried to sleep, always tough for me to do in the back yard,
      > > for some reason. But not in the woods in a hammock, where I sleep like
      > > the dead! Once again, though it felt like the pod did not quite
      > > my low point ( very small gap), when I reached around the outside, it
      > > only felt like there was no more than 1 - 1.5" loft. I said to heck
      > > with it, as I figured there would be plenty of days on the trail
      where I
      > > would be too tired to fool with fine adjustments. Let's just see
      how it
      > > goes. I figured I would have to go in later, too cold.
      > >
      > > It took about 10 or 20 minutes before I realized that I was
      starting to
      > > over heat. So I let my hood down, and then I was just plenty warm, but
      > > not starting to sweat. I did my usual fitful backyard style sleeping,
      > > but plenty warm, I had to admit. Once during the night, I was not
      > > comfortable enough around my shoulders, having my usual trouble with
      > > draftiness when using a quilt, especially when I would move briefly to
      > > my side. I never have much luck using sleeping bags as quilts as
      far as
      > > drafts around the shoulders. But I would just snug the quilt up and be
      > > fine again until I moved too much, plus at some point I pulled the
      > > back up.
      > >
      > > Finally, I woke up at what I figured was about 0130 or 0230. I was no
      > > longer toasty warm, but I was not uncomfortably cold. Just barely
      > > top and bottom. So I figured that's it, I'll go in and get some good
      > > sleep. It's probably about 16* and I have established my lower limit
      > > with this set-up. So I turned on my head lamp, looked at my watch, and
      > > lo and behold it was 0430! So I had made it through most of the night
      > > without getting uncomfortably cold, just barely cool. Amazingly
      for me,
      > > even though I had a big drink of water right before bed in hopes of
      > > staying hydrated in the cold, I had not even had to gt up and take a
      > > leak over 51/2 hours. So I decided to just ride it out until 0600,
      > > I had to get up for work anyway. But as the night was nearly over, I
      > > decided to take a risk on condensation and closed the pod completely.
      > > Boy, that made a very noticeable difference pretty quickly. In a few
      > > minutes, I was agin warm on top, and still just ok on the bottom.
      I fell
      > > back asleep, but then car noises woke me up again at 0500, and now I
      > > realized I really did have to take a leak, so I just got up. I
      looked at
      > > my thermometer, and it read 10*! Plus, according to the weather folks,
      > > there was an intermittent wind chill of zero* to 5*.
      > >
      > > Folks, I don't know about you, but I think that is pretty darn good
      > > performance for that amount of gear in a hammock! It definitely worked
      > > as advertised. And I wonder if I can do better if I ever get better at
      > > getting a "snugfit" with out loft loss on the bottom?
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > Yahoo! Groups Links
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > don`t leave the CREATOR out of the creation!!!
      > >
      > >
      > > ---------------------------------
      > > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
      > >
      > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      > >
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • Show all 18 messages in this topic