10567Re: [Hammock Camping] D.A.M. vs Underquilt - Why Choose?
- Oct 1, 2005That is a good point jwj32542, and it is thoughts like
that I am hoping to get, whether anyone has experience
or not. More people in the conversation means more
To address the question, at least in my case, I think
while the quilt is not inflated, it will act just like
any baffled quilt. When it is inflated, other DAMs
seem to be working for others without any insulation
between the tubes. Thinking about it, I think that
when weight is on it, the tubes smash a bit, deforming
from cylinders, to other less perfect shapes. Since
they are held tight together, I would bet that the
tops and bottoms of the cylinder curves expand out,
while the extreme edges (the only bit touching without
weight) stay the same since they are already tucked up
against one another. In this case then, I think that
the tubes take on a more square like cross section,
thereby insulating the space. At least that seems to
make the most sence since the tubes must deform some
way, and nobody with a DAM has reported any cold
strips so far.
Should it prove to be a problem however, I can add
insulation between the tubes too. The idea I have
basically is to have it constructed as similar to a
baffled quilt as I can, just with air tight baffles.
When used in quilt mode with no weight on it, it
should move and deform same as any other quilt. If it
does not, it would be possible to add down inbetween
the tubes. I really don't know though I suppose
untill I try. Anyone else have any thoughts or ideas?
Think it will work the way I imagine, or is there
something I am overlooking? I think I will order the
materials to start work some time in the next week or
so, I would like to have my plan completed. Thank you
all for your time.
Though I may die tomorrow, at least I can do it with the knowledge that once I did know true love -unknown
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
- << Previous post in topic