Re: 11113: Mr Hamel Message
- Your Point?
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "john pasley" <john@j...> wrote:
> Time02112....Vosstech, no let's try Gary Voss
> > -----DAFT? ----
> > perhaps my 41 yr. old memory is more unreliably inconsistent to
> > of someone nearly twice my own, Please forgive me if I am in
> > ---LoL
> Yes, Mr Hamel is nearly twice your age, are you suggesting that he
> unreliable and inconsistent, or even as unreliably inconsistent as
> words), or are you just generally suggesting people of his age are
> unreliable and inconsistent? Please dont expect me to laugh at Mr
> you, he like many people of his age is firing on all cylinders,
> some people half his age. I call you "daft", in return you insult
> The reason for me having any worries about your opinion is from a
> message of yours, in the group messages number 7321:
> > > I plan to document video & photos to include a professional
> > interview
> > > with David Hamel to be included with the new book that is nearly
> > > ready for publishing and we need your help!
> > >
> > > Thank You All For Your Support!
> > >
> > > ---T12 of T.A.P.-T.E.N.
> The last person who got his facts muddled and wrote a book was Paul
> and his book 'Granite Starship'. Whether he got his facts wrong
> intentionally or not is not relevant. He caused a big problem, not
> not to anyone in this group, but many people who would have had an
> in Mr Hamel were put off by the book, and the personal worry to Mr
> huge. I suspect Paul Coulbeck was also laughing at Mr Hamel, that
> was thrown off Mr Hamel's property and his books with him.
> I presume it is your book in any case, I trust you are not claiming
> any input into Mr Hamel's book. I'm sure books about the
> 120 foot pyramids in 140 foot of water which remain undiscovered by
> will be of amusement to some.