Re: The 'P' word
Thanks for that bit of info there ;-) Can you explain the difference
between a plasma and a group of positive ions, to all of us then ?
I would have to apologize to everybody that read my previous posts as
I am obviously unaware of what a plasma really is !
If I am right, you are going to say something like - ' a plasma is
what remains when all of the electrons are removed from the atom. The
more electrons that get removed the closer this substance gets to
being a true plasma.'
Am I right with the above ?
Sorry everyone for confusing you all with my continuous ranting about
PLASMA ( what I should have said was POSITIVE IONS ).
Good luck to you all
- Hi Adraain,
You are absolutely right. A plasma IS where a group of
atoms have been exited enough to liberate all of their electrons. The whole
mass exists (nucleus & electrons) in a kind of high energy soup. The
energy/temperature has to be so high that the electrons cannot loose enough
energy to settle into an orbit around a nucleus (protons & neutrons).
A plasma is normally contained by strong, constantly
controlled, electromagnetic fields which hold the plasma in suspension , so
to speak. I have read that the task of keeping the plasma contained is like
trying to push jelly (jello) into a sphere using rubber bands! Once the
plasma is successfully contained, however, the temperature is kept up by the
application of microwaves into its core.
[There is a project called JET (the 'Joint European
Toroid'), which is basically a contained donut shaped plasma, which once
brought up to high enough temperatures and pressures (approaching that of
the centre of our Sun), it is expected that nuclear fusion will take place.
When I read an article on it a few years ago, they had reached the necessary
temperatures and also the pressures but never both at once. The bigger the
device, the more efficient it becomes and the easier it is to sustain both
conditions - if the device is built over a certain size, then the efficiency
goes well over 100%, apparently but with a predicted price tag (about five
years ago) in excess of $6Billon (US) each. Needless to say, the funding has
not been forthcoming, although they predicted that six of the devices could
power most of the energy requirements of the northern hemisphere - yes
This is yet another chance for us to achieve the goal of
clean, (virtually) free energy. I say virtually, because the main
constituent of the reaction that needs renewing is Lithium Hydride but this
can easily be filtered from ordinary sea water - and we have enough to last
us millions of years !! Also another great thing about this plasma toroid is
that if, for some reason, the control mechanisms that contain it fail, then
the reaction just stops - no melt down, no radiation, it just stops.
Several $billion sounds a lot I suppose but remind me
someone, how much does the 'developed world' spend on defence each year ???]
Anyway Ariaan, I hope this was of some interest and keep
the posts coming!
>Thanks for that bit of info there ;-) Can you explain the difference
>between a plasma and a group of positive ions, to all of us then ?
>If I am right, you are going to say something like - ' a plasma is
>what remains when all of the electrons are removed from the atom. The
>more electrons that get removed the closer this substance gets to
>being a true plasma.'
>Am I right with the above ?
>Sorry everyone for confusing you all with my continuous ranting about
>PLASMA ( what I should have said was POSITIVE IONS ).
>Good luck to you all
Thanks for the rundown of plasma.
Correct me if I am wrong. If we can continually send a vortex of
positive ions through the same process that rips its electrons off we
would eventually end up with a true plasma. - speculating ;-)
If we could cause a tornado of positive ions to reach a state of
ressonance at an extremely high frequency - we could theoretically
increase the energy in the tornado and cause more electrons to escape
the atoms until we have a true plasma. The high energy buildup will
then prevent electrons from recombining.
If we then could form a liquid plasma that rotates around a hollow
conductor - this positive plasma is controlled by a negative medium
which is inside the hollow conductor ( attraction ).
Eventually the craft + the plasma around it forms a nucleus and all
the free electrons around the NEW nucleus will fit into NEW orbits
and that is the creation of an ATOM as written above most of Mr.
Hamels drawings of the craft.
What do you think of the above ? Is it possible ? Do you think thats
how it could work ?
What do you think is the bright corona around the prototype that took
According to Bob Lazar - the physicist that worked at Area 51 there
are two types of gravity. Gravity A and Gravity B. Gravity A is at
Atomic level and Gravity B is the BIG Gravity we experience on earth.
Gravity B is the weak one because we can temporarily break it by
merely jumping in the air. Gravity A is very very strong and can be
accessed when atoms split under controlled conditions. Some elements
like element 115 ( not found on earth ) has a gravity A wave that
extends past the perimeter of the atoms that make up this element.
By creating something that resembles a huge atom with millions and
millions of electrons orbiting a HUGE nucleus consisting of millions
and millions of protons and neutrons - we can have an even stronger
gravity A wave that could provide all the gravity and propulsion
needed in such a craft.
Let me know what you think !