Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion

Expand Messages
  • George Pantos
    Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion 10diggsdigg June 30, 2008 (2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5) Loading ... Boeing, the world’s largest aircraft
    Message 1 of 13 , Jul 15, 2010

      Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion

      10diggsdiggJune 30, 2008
      1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
      Loading ... Loading ...

      Boeing, the world’s largest aircraft manufacturer, has admitted it is working on experimental anti-gravity projects that could overturn a century of conventional aerospace propulsion technology if the science underpinning them can be engineered into hardware.

      As part of the effort, which is being run out of Boeing’s Phantom Works advanced research and development facility in Seattle, the company is trying to solicit the services of a Russian scientist who claims he has developed anti-gravity devices in Russia and Finland. The approach, however, has been thwarted by Russian officialdom.

      The Boeing drive to develop a collaborative relationship with the scientist in question, Dr Evgeny Podkletnov, has its own internal project name: ‘GRASP’ — Gravity Research for Advanced Space Propulsion.

      A GRASP briefing document obtained by JDW sets out what Boeing believes to be at stake. “If gravity modification is real,” it says, “it will alter the entire aerospace business.”

      GRASP’s objective is to explore propellentless propulsion (the aerospace world’s more formal term for anti-gravity), determine the validity of Podkletnov’s work and “examine possible uses for such a technology”. Applications, the company says, could include space launch systems, artificial gravity on spacecraft, aircraft propulsion and ‘fuelless’ electricity generation — so-called ‘free energy’.

      But it is also apparent that Podkletnov’s work could be engineered into a radical new weapon. The GRASP paper focuses on Podkletnov’s claims that his high-power experiments, using a device called an ‘impulse gravity generator’, are capable of producing a beam of ‘gravity-like’ energy that can exert an instantaneous force of 1,000g on any object — enough, in principle, to vaporise it, especially if the object is moving at high speed.

      Podkletnov maintains that a laboratory installation in Russia has already demonstrated the 4in (10cm) wide beam’s ability to repel objects a kilometre away and that it exhibits negligible power loss at distances of up to 200km. Such a device, observers say, could be adapted for use as an anti-satellite weapon or a ballistic missile shield. Podkletnov declared that any object placed above his rapidly spinning superconducting apparatus lost up to 2% of its weight.

      Although he was vilified by traditionalists who claimed that gravity-shielding was impossible under the known laws of physics, the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) attempted to replicate his work in the mid-1990s. Because NASA lacked Podkletnov’s unique formula for the work, the attempt failed. NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Alabama will shortly conduct a second set of experiments using apparatus built to Podkletnov’s specifications.

      Boeing recently approached Podkletnov directly, but promptly fell foul of Russian technology transfer controls (Moscow wants to stem the exodus of Russian high technology to the West).

      The GRASP briefing document reveals that BAE Systems and Lockheed Martin have also contacted Podkletnov “and have some activity in this area”.

      It is also possible, Boeing admits, that “classified activities in gravity modification may exist”. The paper points out that Podkletnov is strongly anti-military and will only provide assistance if the research is carried out in the ‘white world’ of open development.

    • George Pantos
      maybe i should ask for a billion dollars to explain it to people.. but i don t think so.. i would like to wait 10 years.. u know i think maybe even north
      Message 2 of 13 , Jul 15, 2010
        maybe i should ask for a billion dollars to explain it to people.. but i don't think so..  i would like to wait 10 years.. u know i think maybe even north korea is on to some of this stuff.. 
        but our govt, and the isreali govt have become a axis of idiots.. so where i could help just about everybody, i'd rather watch them die.. and sit back and watch the entertainment of the clowns death.. besides there is no such thing as judaism.. should all be christians by now.. like telling me the world is flat.. even though it' s round.. and the stupid irony of the matter is that these lunatics who abide that the world is flat, still have to obey by the laws of a round world..   and here i am christopher columbus who has been to the other side.. thru my own sweat and blood.. though not the first..
         
         
        ----- Original Message -----
        Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 9:19 PM
        Subject: [hameltech] Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion

         

        Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion

        10diggsdiggJune 30, 2008
        1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
        Loading ... Loading ...

        Boeing, the world’s largest aircraft manufacturer, has admitted it is working on experimental anti-gravity projects that could overturn a century of conventional aerospace propulsion technology if the science underpinning them can be engineered into hardware.

        As part of the effort, which is being run out of Boeing’s Phantom Works advanced research and development facility in Seattle, the company is trying to solicit the services of a Russian scientist who claims he has developed anti-gravity devices in Russia and Finland. The approach, however, has been thwarted by Russian officialdom.

        The Boeing drive to develop a collaborative relationship with the scientist in question, Dr Evgeny Podkletnov, has its own internal project name: ‘GRASP’ — Gravity Research for Advanced Space Propulsion.

        A GRASP briefing document obtained by JDW sets out what Boeing believes to be at stake. “If gravity modification is real,” it says, “it will alter the entire aerospace business.”

        GRASP’s objective is to explore propellentless propulsion (the aerospace world’s more formal term for anti-gravity) , determine the validity of Podkletnov’s work and “examine possible uses for such a technology”. Applications, the company says, could include space launch systems, artificial gravity on spacecraft, aircraft propulsion and ‘fuelless’ electricity generation — so-called ‘free energy’.

        But it is also apparent that Podkletnov’s work could be engineered into a radical new weapon. The GRASP paper focuses on Podkletnov’s claims that his high-power experiments, using a device called an ‘impulse gravity generator’, are capable of producing a beam of ‘gravity-like’ energy that can exert an instantaneous force of 1,000g on any object — enough, in principle, to vaporise it, especially if the object is moving at high speed.

        Podkletnov maintains that a laboratory installation in Russia has already demonstrated the 4in (10cm) wide beam’s ability to repel objects a kilometre away and that it exhibits negligible power loss at distances of up to 200km. Such a device, observers say, could be adapted for use as an anti-satellite weapon or a ballistic missile shield. Podkletnov declared that any object placed above his rapidly spinning superconducting apparatus lost up to 2% of its weight.

        Although he was vilified by traditionalists who claimed that gravity-shielding was impossible under the known laws of physics, the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) attempted to replicate his work in the mid-1990s. Because NASA lacked Podkletnov’s unique formula for the work, the attempt failed. NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Alabama will shortly conduct a second set of experiments using apparatus built to Podkletnov’s specifications.

        Boeing recently approached Podkletnov directly, but promptly fell foul of Russian technology transfer controls (Moscow wants to stem the exodus of Russian high technology to the West).

        The GRASP briefing document reveals that BAE Systems and Lockheed Martin have also contacted Podkletnov “and have some activity in this area”.

        It is also possible, Boeing admits, that “classified activities in gravity modification may exist”. The paper points out that Podkletnov is strongly anti-military and will only provide assistance if the research is carried out in the ‘white world’ of open development.

      • George Pantos
        wouldn t matter though but they have picked up a gun.. and should be stopped dead in their tracks.. ... From: George Pantos To: hameltech@yahoogroups.com Sent:
        Message 3 of 13 , Jul 15, 2010
          wouldn't matter though but they have picked up a gun.. and should be stopped dead in their tracks..
           
           
          ----- Original Message -----
          Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 9:35 PM
          Subject: Re: [hameltech] Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion

           

          maybe i should ask for a billion dollars to explain it to people.. but i don't think so..  i would like to wait 10 years.. u know i think maybe even north korea is on to some of this stuff.. 
          but our govt, and the isreali govt have become a axis of idiots.. so where i could help just about everybody, i'd rather watch them die.. and sit back and watch the entertainment of the clowns death.. besides there is no such thing as judaism.. should all be christians by now.. like telling me the world is flat.. even though it' s round.. and the stupid irony of the matter is that these lunatics who abide that the world is flat, still have to obey by the laws of a round world..   and here i am christopher columbus who has been to the other side.. thru my own sweat and blood.. though not the first..
           
           
          ----- Original Message -----
          Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 9:19 PM
          Subject: [hameltech] Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion

           

          Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion

          10diggsdiggJune 30, 2008
          1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
          Loading ... Loading ...

          Boeing, the world’s largest aircraft manufacturer, has admitted it is working on experimental anti-gravity projects that could overturn a century of conventional aerospace propulsion technology if the science underpinning them can be engineered into hardware.

          As part of the effort, which is being run out of Boeing’s Phantom Works advanced research and development facility in Seattle, the company is trying to solicit the services of a Russian scientist who claims he has developed anti-gravity devices in Russia and Finland. The approach, however, has been thwarted by Russian officialdom.

          The Boeing drive to develop a collaborative relationship with the scientist in question, Dr Evgeny Podkletnov, has its own internal project name: ‘GRASP’ — Gravity Research for Advanced Space Propulsion.

          A GRASP briefing document obtained by JDW sets out what Boeing believes to be at stake. “If gravity modification is real,” it says, “it will alter the entire aerospace business.”

          GRASP’s objective is to explore propellentless propulsion (the aerospace world’s more formal term for anti-gravity) , determine the validity of Podkletnov’s work and “examine possible uses for such a technology”. Applications, the company says, could include space launch systems, artificial gravity on spacecraft, aircraft propulsion and ‘fuelless’ electricity generation — so-called ‘free energy’.

          But it is also apparent that Podkletnov’s work could be engineered into a radical new weapon. The GRASP paper focuses on Podkletnov’s claims that his high-power experiments, using a device called an ‘impulse gravity generator’, are capable of producing a beam of ‘gravity-like’ energy that can exert an instantaneous force of 1,000g on any object — enough, in principle, to vaporise it, especially if the object is moving at high speed.

          Podkletnov maintains that a laboratory installation in Russia has already demonstrated the 4in (10cm) wide beam’s ability to repel objects a kilometre away and that it exhibits negligible power loss at distances of up to 200km. Such a device, observers say, could be adapted for use as an anti-satellite weapon or a ballistic missile shield. Podkletnov declared that any object placed above his rapidly spinning superconducting apparatus lost up to 2% of its weight.

          Although he was vilified by traditionalists who claimed that gravity-shielding was impossible under the known laws of physics, the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) attempted to replicate his work in the mid-1990s. Because NASA lacked Podkletnov’s unique formula for the work, the attempt failed. NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Alabama will shortly conduct a second set of experiments using apparatus built to Podkletnov’s specifications.

          Boeing recently approached Podkletnov directly, but promptly fell foul of Russian technology transfer controls (Moscow wants to stem the exodus of Russian high technology to the West).

          The GRASP briefing document reveals that BAE Systems and Lockheed Martin have also contacted Podkletnov “and have some activity in this area”.

          It is also possible, Boeing admits, that “classified activities in gravity modification may exist”. The paper points out that Podkletnov is strongly anti-military and will only provide assistance if the research is carried out in the ‘white world’ of open development.

        • Andrew Kenney
          Hi George, You know, I ve got no love for what s happening in the States either (and to some extent, the rest of the free world).  Money, money, money.....
          Message 4 of 13 , Jul 16, 2010
            Hi George,

            You know, I've got no love for what's happening in the States either (and to some extent, the rest of the free world).  Money, money, money..... control, control, and more control.... but, I try not to give up!  That's one reason why I joined this group.

            Reading your last few "rants" does nothing for me except remind me of something my father once said to me........

            "put up or shut up!!"

            That's my two cents worth!!  Cheers to all group members!!

            Regards,

            Andy Kenney

            --- On Fri, 7/16/10, George Pantos <gop6@...> wrote:

            From: George Pantos <gop6@...>
            Subject: Re: [hameltech] Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion
            To: hameltech@yahoogroups.com
            Date: Friday, July 16, 2010, 9:37 AM

             

            wouldn't matter though but they have picked up a gun.. and should be stopped dead in their tracks..
             
             
            ----- Original Message -----
            Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 9:35 PM
            Subject: Re: [hameltech] Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion

             

            maybe i should ask for a billion dollars to explain it to people.. but i don't think so..  i would like to wait 10 years.. u know i think maybe even north korea is on to some of this stuff.. 
            but our govt, and the isreali govt have become a axis of idiots.. so where i could help just about everybody, i'd rather watch them die.. and sit back and watch the entertainment of the clowns death.. besides there is no such thing as judaism.. should all be christians by now.. like telling me the world is flat.. even though it' s round.. and the stupid irony of the matter is that these lunatics who abide that the world is flat, still have to obey by the laws of a round world..   and here i am christopher columbus who has been to the other side.. thru my own sweat and blood.. though not the first..
             
             
            ----- Original Message -----
            Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 9:19 PM
            Subject: [hameltech] Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion

             

            Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion

            10diggsdiggJune 30, 2008
            1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
            Loading ... Loading ...

            Boeing, the world’s largest aircraft manufacturer, has admitted it is working on experimental anti-gravity projects that could overturn a century of conventional aerospace propulsion technology if the science underpinning them can be engineered into hardware.

            As part of the effort, which is being run out of Boeing’s Phantom Works advanced research and development facility in Seattle, the company is trying to solicit the services of a Russian scientist who claims he has developed anti-gravity devices in Russia and Finland. The approach, however, has been thwarted by Russian officialdom.

            The Boeing drive to develop a collaborative relationship with the scientist in question, Dr Evgeny Podkletnov, has its own internal project name: ‘GRASP’ — Gravity Research for Advanced Space Propulsion.

            A GRASP briefing document obtained by JDW sets out what Boeing believes to be at stake. “If gravity modification is real,” it says, “it will alter the entire aerospace business.”

            GRASP’s objective is to explore propellentless propulsion (the aerospace world’s more formal term for anti-gravity) , determine the validity of Podkletnov’s work and “examine possible uses for such a technology”. Applications, the company says, could include space launch systems, artificial gravity on spacecraft, aircraft propulsion and ‘fuelless’ electricity generation — so-called ‘free energy’.

            But it is also apparent that Podkletnov’s work could be engineered into a radical new weapon. The GRASP paper focuses on Podkletnov’s claims that his high-power experiments, using a device called an ‘impulse gravity generator’, are capable of producing a beam of ‘gravity-like’ energy that can exert an instantaneous force of 1,000g on any object — enough, in principle, to vaporise it, especially if the object is moving at high speed.

            Podkletnov maintains that a laboratory installation in Russia has already demonstrated the 4in (10cm) wide beam’s ability to repel objects a kilometre away and that it exhibits negligible power loss at distances of up to 200km. Such a device, observers say, could be adapted for use as an anti-satellite weapon or a ballistic missile shield. Podkletnov declared that any object placed above his rapidly spinning superconducting apparatus lost up to 2% of its weight.

            Although he was vilified by traditionalists who claimed that gravity-shielding was impossible under the known laws of physics, the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) attempted to replicate his work in the mid-1990s. Because NASA lacked Podkletnov’s unique formula for the work, the attempt failed. NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Alabama will shortly conduct a second set of experiments using apparatus built to Podkletnov’s specifications.

            Boeing recently approached Podkletnov directly, but promptly fell foul of Russian technology transfer controls (Moscow wants to stem the exodus of Russian high technology to the West).

            The GRASP briefing document reveals that BAE Systems and Lockheed Martin have also contacted Podkletnov “and have some activity in this area”.

            It is also possible, Boeing admits, that “classified activities in gravity modification may exist”. The paper points out that Podkletnov is strongly anti-military and will only provide assistance if the research is carried out in the ‘white world’ of open development.


          • TIm Wisener
            Nicely said. ________________________________ From: Andrew Kenney To: hameltech@yahoogroups.com Sent: Fri, July 16, 2010 3:52:52 AM
            Message 5 of 13 , Jul 16, 2010
              Nicely said.


              From: Andrew Kenney <ajkenney2000@...>
              To: hameltech@yahoogroups.com
              Sent: Fri, July 16, 2010 3:52:52 AM
              Subject: Re: [hameltech] Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion

               

              Hi George,

              You know, I've got no love for what's happening in the States either (and to some extent, the rest of the free world).  Money, money, money..... control, control, and more control.... but, I try not to give up!  That's one reason why I joined this group.

              Reading your last few "rants" does nothing for me except remind me of something my father once said to me........

              "put up or shut up!!"

              That's my two cents worth!!  Cheers to all group members!!

              Regards,

              Andy Kenney

              --- On Fri, 7/16/10, George Pantos <gop6@comcast. net> wrote:

              From: George Pantos <gop6@comcast. net>
              Subject: Re: [hameltech] Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion
              To: hameltech@yahoogrou ps.com
              Date: Friday, July 16, 2010, 9:37 AM

               

              wouldn't matter though but they have picked up a gun.. and should be stopped dead in their tracks..
               
               
              ----- Original Message -----
              Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 9:35 PM
              Subject: Re: [hameltech] Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion

               

              maybe i should ask for a billion dollars to explain it to people.. but i don't think so..  i would like to wait 10 years.. u know i think maybe even north korea is on to some of this stuff.. 
              but our govt, and the isreali govt have become a axis of idiots.. so where i could help just about everybody, i'd rather watch them die.. and sit back and watch the entertainment of the clowns death.. besides there is no such thing as judaism.. should all be christians by now.. like telling me the world is flat.. even though it' s round.. and the stupid irony of the matter is that these lunatics who abide that the world is flat, still have to obey by the laws of a round world..   and here i am christopher columbus who has been to the other side.. thru my own sweat and blood.. though not the first..
               
               
              ----- Original Message -----
              Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 9:19 PM
              Subject: [hameltech] Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion

               

              Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion

              10diggsdiggJune 30, 2008
              1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
              Loading ... Loading ...

              Boeing, the world’s largest aircraft manufacturer, has admitted it is working on experimental anti-gravity projects that could overturn a century of conventional aerospace propulsion technology if the science underpinning them can be engineered into hardware.

              As part of the effort, which is being run out of Boeing’s Phantom Works advanced research and development facility in Seattle, the company is trying to solicit the services of a Russian scientist who claims he has developed anti-gravity devices in Russia and Finland. The approach, however, has been thwarted by Russian officialdom.

              The Boeing drive to develop a collaborative relationship with the scientist in question, Dr Evgeny Podkletnov, has its own internal project name: ‘GRASP’ — Gravity Research for Advanced Space Propulsion.

              A GRASP briefing document obtained by JDW sets out what Boeing believes to be at stake. “If gravity modification is real,” it says, “it will alter the entire aerospace business.”

              GRASP’s objective is to explore propellentless propulsion (the aerospace world’s more formal term for anti-gravity) , determine the validity of Podkletnov’s work and “examine possible uses for such a technology”. Applications, the company says, could include space launch systems, artificial gravity on spacecraft, aircraft propulsion and ‘fuelless’ electricity generation — so-called ‘free energy’.

              But it is also apparent that Podkletnov’s work could be engineered into a radical new weapon. The GRASP paper focuses on Podkletnov’s claims that his high-power experiments, using a device called an ‘impulse gravity generator’, are capable of producing a beam of ‘gravity-like’ energy that can exert an instantaneous force of 1,000g on any object — enough, in principle, to vaporise it, especially if the object is moving at high speed.

              Podkletnov maintains that a laboratory installation in Russia has already demonstrated the 4in (10cm) wide beam’s ability to repel objects a kilometre away and that it exhibits negligible power loss at distances of up to 200km. Such a device, observers say, could be adapted for use as an anti-satellite weapon or a ballistic missile shield. Podkletnov declared that any object placed above his rapidly spinning superconducting apparatus lost up to 2% of its weight.

              Although he was vilified by traditionalists who claimed that gravity-shielding was impossible under the known laws of physics, the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) attempted to replicate his work in the mid-1990s. Because NASA lacked Podkletnov’s unique formula for the work, the attempt failed. NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Alabama will shortly conduct a second set of experiments using apparatus built to Podkletnov’s specifications.

              Boeing recently approached Podkletnov directly, but promptly fell foul of Russian technology transfer controls (Moscow wants to stem the exodus of Russian high technology to the West).

              The GRASP briefing document reveals that BAE Systems and Lockheed Martin have also contacted Podkletnov “and have some activity in this area”.

              It is also possible, Boeing admits, that “classified activities in gravity modification may exist”. The paper points out that Podkletnov is strongly anti-military and will only provide assistance if the research is carried out in the ‘white world’ of open development.



            • George Pantos
              what about nicely done..?? cryptic.. and enigmatic.. ... From: TIm Wisener To: hameltech@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 10:24 AM Subject: Re:
              Message 6 of 13 , Jul 16, 2010
                
                what about nicely done..??
                 
                cryptic.. and enigmatic..
                 
                 
                ----- Original Message -----
                Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 10:24 AM
                Subject: Re: [hameltech] Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion

                 

                Nicely said.


                From: Andrew Kenney <ajkenney2000@ yahoo.com>
                To: hameltech@yahoogrou ps.com
                Sent: Fri, July 16, 2010 3:52:52 AM
                Subject: Re: [hameltech] Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion

                 

                Hi George,

                You know, I've got no love for what's happening in the States either (and to some extent, the rest of the free world).  Money, money, money..... control, control, and more control.... but, I try not to give up!  That's one reason why I joined this group.

                Reading your last few "rants" does nothing for me except remind me of something my father once said to me........

                "put up or shut up!!"

                That's my two cents worth!!  Cheers to all group members!!

                Regards,

                Andy Kenney

                --- On Fri, 7/16/10, George Pantos <gop6@comcast. net> wrote:

                From: George Pantos <gop6@comcast. net>
                Subject: Re: [hameltech] Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion
                To: hameltech@yahoogrou ps.com
                Date: Friday, July 16, 2010, 9:37 AM

                 

                wouldn't matter though but they have picked up a gun.. and should be stopped dead in their tracks..
                 
                 
                ----- Original Message -----
                Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 9:35 PM
                Subject: Re: [hameltech] Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion

                 

                maybe i should ask for a billion dollars to explain it to people.. but i don't think so..  i would like to wait 10 years.. u know i think maybe even north korea is on to some of this stuff.. 
                but our govt, and the isreali govt have become a axis of idiots.. so where i could help just about everybody, i'd rather watch them die.. and sit back and watch the entertainment of the clowns death.. besides there is no such thing as judaism.. should all be christians by now.. like telling me the world is flat.. even though it' s round.. and the stupid irony of the matter is that these lunatics who abide that the world is flat, still have to obey by the laws of a round world..   and here i am christopher columbus who has been to the other side.. thru my own sweat and blood.. though not the first..
                 
                 
                ----- Original Message -----
                Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 9:19 PM
                Subject: [hameltech] Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion

                 

                Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion

                10diggsdiggJune 30, 2008
                1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
                Loading ... Loading ...

                Boeing, the world’s largest aircraft manufacturer, has admitted it is working on experimental anti-gravity projects that could overturn a century of conventional aerospace propulsion technology if the science underpinning them can be engineered into hardware.

                As part of the effort, which is being run out of Boeing’s Phantom Works advanced research and development facility in Seattle, the company is trying to solicit the services of a Russian scientist who claims he has developed anti-gravity devices in Russia and Finland. The approach, however, has been thwarted by Russian officialdom.

                The Boeing drive to develop a collaborative relationship with the scientist in question, Dr Evgeny Podkletnov, has its own internal project name: ‘GRASP’ — Gravity Research for Advanced Space Propulsion.

                A GRASP briefing document obtained by JDW sets out what Boeing believes to be at stake. “If gravity modification is real,” it says, “it will alter the entire aerospace business.”

                GRASP’s objective is to explore propellentless propulsion (the aerospace world’s more formal term for anti-gravity) , determine the validity of Podkletnov’s work and “examine possible uses for such a technology”. Applications, the company says, could include space launch systems, artificial gravity on spacecraft, aircraft propulsion and ‘fuelless’ electricity generation — so-called ‘free energy’.

                But it is also apparent that Podkletnov’s work could be engineered into a radical new weapon. The GRASP paper focuses on Podkletnov’s claims that his high-power experiments, using a device called an ‘impulse gravity generator’, are capable of producing a beam of ‘gravity-like’ energy that can exert an instantaneous force of 1,000g on any object — enough, in principle, to vaporise it, especially if the object is moving at high speed.

                Podkletnov maintains that a laboratory installation in Russia has already demonstrated the 4in (10cm) wide beam’s ability to repel objects a kilometre away and that it exhibits negligible power loss at distances of up to 200km. Such a device, observers say, could be adapted for use as an anti-satellite weapon or a ballistic missile shield. Podkletnov declared that any object placed above his rapidly spinning superconducting apparatus lost up to 2% of its weight.

                Although he was vilified by traditionalists who claimed that gravity-shielding was impossible under the known laws of physics, the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) attempted to replicate his work in the mid-1990s. Because NASA lacked Podkletnov’s unique formula for the work, the attempt failed. NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Alabama will shortly conduct a second set of experiments using apparatus built to Podkletnov’s specifications.

                Boeing recently approached Podkletnov directly, but promptly fell foul of Russian technology transfer controls (Moscow wants to stem the exodus of Russian high technology to the West).

                The GRASP briefing document reveals that BAE Systems and Lockheed Martin have also contacted Podkletnov “and have some activity in this area”.

                It is also possible, Boeing admits, that “classified activities in gravity modification may exist”. The paper points out that Podkletnov is strongly anti-military and will only provide assistance if the research is carried out in the ‘white world’ of open development.



              • Bafoofkit
                Experimental Results on Podkletnov s Impulse Gravity Generator The detection of apparent anomalous forces in the vicinity of high-Tc superconductors under non
                Message 7 of 13 , Oct 18, 2010
                  Experimental Results on Podkletnov's Impulse Gravity Generator

                  The detection of apparent anomalous forces in the vicinity of high-Tc superconductors under non equilibrium conditions has stimulated an experimental research in which the operating parameters of the experiment have been pushed to values higher than those employed in previous attempts. The results confirm the existence of an unexpected physical interaction. An apparatus has been constructed and tested in which the superconductor is subjected to peak currents in excess of 10^4 A, surface potentials in excess of 1 MV, trapped magnetic field up to 1 T, and temperature down to 40 K. In order to produce the required currents a high voltage discharge technique has been employed. Discharges originating from a superconducting ceramic electrode are accompanied by the emission of radiation which propagates in a focused beam without noticeable attenuation through different materials and exerts a short repulsive force on small movable objects along the propagation axis. Within the measurement error (5 to 7 %) the impulse is proportional to the mass of the objects and independent on their composition. It therefore resembles a gravitational impulse. The observed phenomenon appears to be absolutely new and unprecedented in the literature. It cannot be understood in the framework of general relativity. A theory is proposed which combines a quantum gravity approach with anomalous vacuum fluctuations.








                  >
                  > Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion
                  >
                • Bafoofkit
                  ... When you hold your hand in the projection area during the discharge you can feel the force or a short push to your hand together with a kind of an air push
                  Message 8 of 13 , Oct 18, 2010
                    --- In hameltech@yahoogroups.com, "Bafoofkit" <bafoofkit@...> wrote:
                    >
                    > Experimental Results on Podkletnov's Impulse Gravity Generator
                    >
                    When you hold your hand in the projection area during the discharge you can feel the force or a short push to your hand together with a kind of an air push on your hand. If you do not keep you hand tight but a bit relaxed you can feel the slightest movement of the skin on the palm of the hand. The feeling is a bit strange and it is not easy to describe it. No electric shock, just a feeling that the hand is moved similar to the acceleration in a fighter plane but more powerful and very short. No sensation of cold or warmth. It is technically impossible to measure the air pressure as the gravity impulse itself is perhaps one million of a second or even shorter, the time of the electric discharge is much longer. The main impulse is harmless but the backward radiation is dangerous.

                    I do not regard our experiment as something extraordinary but more as a natural development of scientific knowledge in the area of gravity research. Unfortunately I have a long history of sufferings from different institutions if gravity is concerned. Various magazines refuse to publish my articles because the term "antigravity" is a forbidden one in the physical community and also because the field of gravity is a crossing point of several sciences and the knowledge of various subjects in physics and chemistry is needed. People in my team represent experimental and theoretical physics, electricity, physics of low temperatures and superconductors. We do not regard the goal of our research and the latest publication as the attempt to get a Nobel prize, these awards are given mainly for political reasons. We wanted simply to prove that it is possible to control gravity creating artificial gravity field or changing the local gravity field or organising strong gravity impulses. Modern physics should be changed in many aspects. Humanity did not have much progress in understanding Gravity mechanism since the times of Holy inquisition. You know what happened to a guy who was trying to prove that the earth was round at that time. So, we are prepared to fight with "politically correct science" and we do not expect to get any reward for our achievement. Still, we do not lose hope and we are glad that many real scientists are on our side of the barricade.
                  • Bafoofkit
                    I think we have an example of relativistic frame grabbing, which is the underlying mechanism for the Hameltech effect.
                    Message 9 of 13 , Oct 18, 2010
                      I think we have an example of relativistic frame grabbing, which is the underlying mechanism for the Hameltech effect.

                      --- In hameltech@yahoogroups.com, "Bafoofkit" <bafoofkit@...> wrote:
                      >
                      >
                      >
                      > --- In hameltech@yahoogroups.com, "Bafoofkit" <bafoofkit@> wrote:
                      > >
                      > > Experimental Results on Podkletnov's Impulse Gravity Generator
                      > >
                      > When you hold your hand in the projection area during the discharge you can feel the force or a short push to your hand together with a kind of an air push on your hand. If you do not keep you hand tight but a bit relaxed you can feel the slightest movement of the skin on the palm of the hand. The feeling is a bit strange and it is not easy to describe it. No electric shock, just a feeling that the hand is moved similar to the acceleration in a fighter plane but more powerful and very short. No sensation of cold or warmth. It is technically impossible to measure the air pressure as the gravity impulse itself is perhaps one million of a second or even shorter, the time of the electric discharge is much longer. The main impulse is harmless but the backward radiation is dangerous.
                      >
                      > I do not regard our experiment as something extraordinary but more as a natural development of scientific knowledge in the area of gravity research. Unfortunately I have a long history of sufferings from different institutions if gravity is concerned. Various magazines refuse to publish my articles because the term "antigravity" is a forbidden one in the physical community and also because the field of gravity is a crossing point of several sciences and the knowledge of various subjects in physics and chemistry is needed. People in my team represent experimental and theoretical physics, electricity, physics of low temperatures and superconductors. We do not regard the goal of our research and the latest publication as the attempt to get a Nobel prize, these awards are given mainly for political reasons. We wanted simply to prove that it is possible to control gravity creating artificial gravity field or changing the local gravity field or organising strong gravity impulses. Modern physics should be changed in many aspects. Humanity did not have much progress in understanding Gravity mechanism since the times of Holy inquisition. You know what happened to a guy who was trying to prove that the earth was round at that time. So, we are prepared to fight with "politically correct science" and we do not expect to get any reward for our achievement. Still, we do not lose hope and we are glad that many real scientists are on our side of the barricade.
                      >
                    • joesmith@cvctx.com
                      Below you said,,and I will have to type it aas there is no cut and paste from my editor, The impulse is proportional to the mass of the objects and independent
                      Message 10 of 13 , Oct 18, 2010
                        Below you said,,and I will have to type it aas there is no cut and paste from my editor,


                        The impulse is proportional to the mass of the objects and independent of their composition.
                        Question,Did you quote this? if so where please?
                        I am in your debt..
                        Thanks a Million
                        Joe in Texas
                        ,,,,,,,a common man,,,a driller of wells,,,oil that is,,,
                         
                        Sent from my dial up phone
                         
                         
                        On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:20:43 -0000, Bafoofkit wrote:
                         
                        Experimental Results on Podkletnov's Impulse Gravity Generator

                        The detection of apparent anomalous forces in the vicinity of high-Tc superconductors under non equilibrium conditions has stimulated an experimental research in which the operating parameters of the experiment have been pushed to values higher than those employed in previous attempts. The results confirm the existence of an unexpected physical interaction. An apparatus has been constructed and tested in which the superconductor is subjected to peak currents in excess of 10^4 A, surface potentials in excess of 1 MV, trapped magnetic field up to 1 T, and temperature down to 40 K. In order to produce the required currents a high voltage discharge technique has been employed. Discharges originating from a superconducting ceramic electrode are accompanied by the emission of radiation which propagates in a focused beam without noticeable attenuation through different materials and exerts a short repulsive force on small movable objects along the propagation axis. Within the measurement error (5 to 7 %) the impulse is proportional to the mass of the objects and independent on their composition. It therefore resembles a gravitational impulse. The observed phenomenon appears to be absolutely new and unprecedented in the literature. It cannot be understood in the framework of general relativity. A theory is proposed which combines a quantum gravity approach with anomalous vacuum fluctuations.

                        >
                        > Boeing develops Anti-gravity propulsion
                        >




                         

                      • joesmith@cvctx.com
                        Please dis-regard last message. I Apoligize. Humbly Joe in Texas Sent from my dial up phone ... When you hold your hand in the projection area during the
                        Message 11 of 13 , Oct 18, 2010
                          Please dis-regard last message.
                          I Apoligize.
                          Humbly
                          Joe in Texas
                          Sent from my dial up phone
                           
                          On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:23:01 -0000, Bafoofkit wrote:
                           


                          --- In hameltech@yahoogroups.com, "Bafoofkit" <bafoofkit@...> wrote:
                          >
                          > Experimental Results on Podkletnov's Impulse Gravity Generator
                          >
                          When you hold your hand in the projection area during the discharge you can feel the force or a short push to your hand together with a kind of an air push on your hand. If you do not keep you hand tight but a bit relaxed you can feel the slightest movement of the skin on the palm of the hand. The feeling is a bit strange and it is not easy to describe it. No electric shock, just a feeling that the hand is moved similar to the acceleration in a fighter plane but more powerful and very short. No sensation of cold or warmth. It is technically impossible to measure the air pressure as the gravity impulse itself is perhaps one million of a second or even shorter, the time of the electric discharge is much longer. The main impulse is harmless but the backward radiation is dangerous.

                          I do not regard our experiment as something extraordinary but more as a natural development of scientific knowledge in the area of gravity research. Unfortunately I have a long history of sufferings from different institutions if gravity is concerned. Various magazines refuse to publish my articles because the term "antigravity" is a forbidden one in the physical community and also because the field of gravity is a crossing point of several sciences and the knowledge of various subjects in physics and chemistry is needed. People in my team represent experimental and theoretical physics, electricity, physics of low temperatures and superconductors. We do not regard the goal of our research and the latest publication as the attempt to get a Nobel prize, these awards are given mainly for political reasons. We wanted simply to prove that it is possible to control gravity creating artificial gravity field or changing the local gravity field or organising strong gravity impulses. Modern physics should be changed in many aspects. Humanity did not have much progress in understanding Gravity mechanism since the times of Holy inquisition. You know what happened to a guy who was trying to prove that the earth was round at that time. So, we are prepared to fight with "politically correct science" and we do not expect to get any reward for our achievement. Still, we do not lose hope and we are glad that many real scientists are on our side of the barricade.




                           

                        • joesmith@cvctx.com
                          As for Boeing haveing antgravity,,,that may be possible,,,BUT,,,,,,,,If they had enough to put people on Mars,then there would be people on Mars insted of one
                          Message 12 of 13 , Oct 18, 2010
                            As for Boeing haveing antgravity,,,that may be possible,,,BUT,,,,,,,,If they had enough to put people on Mars,then there would be people on Mars insted of one alive rover,,and few satelites in orbit,,,these things are meassured with ones communicatve skills,,IE: if he dosent know the word than he can not describe it,,,,,,he may think it to work in his mind and on paper but NOT untill a valid proof is presented.

                            I have harped on it as long as I care to.
                             
                            Respectfully,
                            Joe in Texas
                            Sent from my dial up phone
                             
                             
                             
                            On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:26:34 -0000, Bafoofkit wrote:
                             
                            I think we have an example of relativistic frame grabbing, which is the underlying mechanism for the Hameltech effect.

                            --- In hameltech@yahoogroups.com, "Bafoofkit" <bafoofkit@...> wrote:
                            >
                            >
                            >
                            > --- In hameltech@yahoogroups.com, "Bafoofkit" <bafoofkit@> wrote:
                            > >
                            > > Experimental Results on Podkletnov's Impulse Gravity Generator
                            > >
                            > When you hold your hand in the projection area during the discharge you can feel the force or a short push to your hand together with a kind of an air push on your hand. If you do not keep you hand tight but a bit relaxed you can feel the slightest movement of the skin on the palm of the hand. The feeling is a bit strange and it is not easy to describe it. No electric shock, just a feeling that the hand is moved similar to the acceleration in a fighter plane but more powerful and very short. No sensation of cold or warmth. It is technically impossible to measure the air pressure as the gravity impulse itself is perhaps one million of a second or even shorter, the time of the electric discharge is much longer. The main impulse is harmless but the backward radiation is dangerous.
                            >
                            > I do not regard our experiment as something extraordinary but more as a natural development of scientific knowledge in the area of gravity research. Unfortunately I have a long history of sufferings from different institutions if gravity is concerned. Various magazines refuse to publish my articles because the term "antigravity" is a forbidden one in the physical community and also because the field of gravity is a crossing point of several sciences and the knowledge of various subjects in physics and chemistry is needed. People in my team represent experimental and theoretical physics, electricity, physics of low temperatures and superconductors. We do not regard the goal of our research and the latest publication as the attempt to get a Nobel prize, these awards are given mainly for political reasons. We wanted simply to prove that it is possible to control gravity creating artificial gravity field or changing the local gravity field or organising strong gravity impulses. Modern physics should be changed in many aspects. Humanity did not have much progress in understanding Gravity mechanism since the times of Holy inquisition. You know what happened to a guy who was trying to prove that the earth was round at that time. So, we are prepared to fight with "politically correct science" and we do not expect to get any reward for our achievement. Still, we do not lose hope and we are glad that many real scientists are on our side of the barricade.
                            >




                             

                          • Mike
                            Mr Barfoofkit, Writing to a group is like talking to friends, not like throwing newspaper cuttings out of a train window, hiding behind a peculiar email title,
                            Message 13 of 13 , Oct 18, 2010

                              Mr Barfoofkit,

                                                  Writing to a group is like talking to friends, not like throwing newspaper cuttings out of a train window, hiding behind a peculiar email title, not addressing the group ,and having appallingly bad manners in not even disclosing your name and signing off with it.

                              You are clearly mixing Eugene Podklotnov’s statements as apparently being your own experiences, and thinking you are exposing something unique and inspiring enough that all will gather crumbs from your table..

                              Perhaps I will be slated by some in group, but bad manners and condescending attitudes, even if unintended, are not good.

                               

                              This is how I think you should have written.

                               

                              Hi All,

                                        I wonder how many of you remember Eugene Podkletnov’s  experiments of 15 years ago, where he dumped 5 million volts at 10,000 amps onto a meissner levitated rotating superconductor and produced 1,000G gravity pulses, which as you will understand are, like Earth’s gravity unattenuated by intervening masses. This follows on from known facts about atoms, in that magnetism is cause by just ONE synchronized electron; and if atoms with unequal spin (lozenge shaped) are somehow induces with enough energy (No one knows HOW as yet), then the characteristics of cooper pairs, super conducting, and all the effects in David Hamel’s ‘fly away’ unit, including the bright blue plasma are recreated.

                              The unknown is, exactly HOW to reproduce to order, and to understand so fully that it can MAYBE be reproduced in a smaller, and less energetic format.

                              MIKE: I would then say if this was general information to group, or if I was GENUINELY experimenting with it, and not merely passing on legends in the many novels produced on this subject; I would genuinely disclose ALL my real knowledge, as this is what the world needs. I would also cite books such as Crandall www.trafford.com. Which explain how gravity can be recovered from a cone or frustum  of these special metals which range from copper (lowest) through Aluminium  to mercury and beyond, with clear cut reference to the Virnamas of ancient India.

                               

                              So, how about starting again, and telling me / group something entirely new, about YOU, and your REAL contribution?

                               

                              Have a good day all of you,

                               

                              Mike.

                               

                              Mike. J. Furness.

                               

                               

                               


                              From: hameltech@yahoogroups.com [mailto: hameltech@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Bafoofkit
                              Sent: 18 October 2010 18:27
                              To: hameltech@yahoogroups.com
                              Subject: [hameltech] Re: Experimental Results on Podkletnov's Impulse Gravity Generator

                               

                               

                              I think we have an example of relativistic frame grabbing, which is the underlying mechanism for the Hameltech effect.

                              --- In hameltech@yahoogroups.com, "Bafoofkit" <bafoofkit@...> wrote:

                              >
                              >
                              >
                              > --- In hameltech@yahoogroups.com,
                              "Bafoofkit" <bafoofkit@> wrote:
                              > >
                              > > Experimental Results on Podkletnov's Impulse Gravity Generator
                              > >
                              > When you hold your hand in the projection area during the discharge you
                              can feel the force or a short push to your hand together with a kind of an air push on your hand. If you do not keep you hand tight but a bit relaxed you can feel the slightest movement of the skin on the palm of the hand. The feeling is a bit strange and it is not easy to describe it. No electric shock, just a feeling that the hand is moved similar to the acceleration in a fighter plane but more powerful and very short. No sensation of cold or warmth. It is technically impossible to measure the air pressure as the gravity impulse itself is perhaps one million of a second or even shorter, the time of the electric discharge is much longer. The main impulse is harmless but the backward radiation is dangerous.
                              >
                              > I do not regard our experiment as something extraordinary but more as a
                              natural development of scientific knowledge in the area of gravity research. Unfortunately I have a long history of sufferings from different institutions if gravity is concerned. Various magazines refuse to publish my articles because the term "antigravity" is a forbidden one in the physical community and also because the field of gravity is a crossing point of several sciences and the knowledge of various subjects in physics and chemistry is needed. People in my team represent experimental and theoretical physics, electricity, physics of low temperatures and superconductors. We do not regard the goal of our research and the latest publication as the attempt to get a Nobel prize, these awards are given mainly for political reasons. We wanted simply to prove that it is possible to control gravity creating artificial gravity field or changing the local gravity field or organising strong gravity impulses. Modern physics should be changed in many aspects. Humanity did not have much progress in understanding Gravity mechanism since the times of Holy inquisition. You know what happened to a guy who was trying to prove that the earth was round at that time. So, we are prepared to fight with "politically correct science" and we do not expect to get any reward for our achievement. Still, we do not lose hope and we are glad that many real scientists are on our side of the barricade.
                              >

                            Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.