- Yes folks I know some will disagree but I believe after following this line of research since about 1958 or so that the answer is there, so many people haveMessage 1 of 9 , Aug 2, 2007View Source
Yes folks I know some will disagree but I believe after following this line of research since about 1958 or so that the answer is there, so many people have come up with different versions of the same priciple,ie.Interaction of magnetic fields under stress or however you like to discibe the principle.The first report I found or remember reading was a report of one of John Searle’s launches in the late fiftys if I remember the reports was in the sunday news. Anyway he was the first & his principle is so simple it’s obvious but difficult to achieve, check out his working device on UTUBE mind you remember it is still not employing the gravity control it is capable of. David Hamels device employs basically the same principles so in theory should have the same result ie ouput of power & gravity interaction.The problem is of course as always money.
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of simplyfree3
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 6:55 AM
Subject: Re: [hameltech] Hi Tara
Well the answer on a plate would be nice yes.
At the same time I'm not afraid of a bit of hard work either, but thats
not the problem.
You mention read this read that, go look at that on google. Why are you
saying this? Have you already read studied and looked and you have
finally found 'the' answer? And now your giving us clues to go and find
it for ourselfs? Or is it for an interesting read?
First of all I asked if you have found any answers or as you say any
ahh ha's. I didn't ask for anything on a plate.
Anyone who had found a very exciting discovery either wouldn't choose
to share it or would share it with the group. After all thats what this
group is about isn't it, to SHARE any important findings about Hamel
tech? Not to make it hard for people to learn by saying read this and
that, buy this and you will find the truth etc. Unless it's necessary
to do so to far better explain it.
Nothing wrong with showing people something interesting to read though.
But you sounded as though you allready had found something and your not
sharing it but telling to read this and that to find the answer by
ourselfs. I am talking in terms for the whole group here.