Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: 11112: cones switched for reaction checking

Expand Messages
  • demondoppel
    in process of creating a new bottom cone. Having some difficulty with the precision of the diameter. WIll be trying another attempt either wed or friday. Matt
    Message 1 of 20 , Dec 27, 2005
    • 0 Attachment
      in process of creating a new bottom cone. Having some difficulty
      with the precision of the diameter. WIll be trying another attempt
      either wed or friday.

      Matt

      --- In hameltech@yahoogroups.com, "demondoppel" <mattihorn@i...>
      wrote:
      >
      > New cement cone built, since the others are losing there narrow
      tops.
      > I am using a cement which gives twice the strength and I put a rod
      up
      > the center.
      >
      > Bottom cone to be welded, magnets on middle, small pending.
      >
      > Christmas time :)
      > Matt
      >
      >
      > --- In hameltech@yahoogroups.com, "demondoppel" <mattihorn@i...>
      > wrote:
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > 11, 6.8 and 4.2 diameter cones are going to be used now.
      > > The 11 inch cone which was made, was off in one dimension during
      > > fabrication, so another one will have to be made.
      > >
      > > Other than that, I suppose that there will be smooth sailing
      ahead.
      > >
      > > 300 more circular magnets bought to ease in the construction.
      > >
      > > No fancy tuning rings (my idea, or an extended idea which was
      > overkill).
      > > Just 3 magnetic rings for keeping the cones. The top two will be
      > next to
      > > each other vertically, while the bottom will be separated by
      just
      > about
      > > an inch or so.
      > >
      > > Magnets on the osc table in repulsion, which will overcome the
      > weight of
      > > the bottom cone's downward thrust.
      > >
      > > Matt
      > >
      >
    • demondoppel
      done but not content with it. Break time for now as needed. Matt ... rod ... during ... be
      Message 2 of 20 , Jan 1, 2006
      • 0 Attachment
        done but not content with it. Break time for now as needed.

        Matt

        --- In hameltech@yahoogroups.com, "demondoppel" <mattihorn@i...>
        wrote:
        >
        > in process of creating a new bottom cone. Having some difficulty
        > with the precision of the diameter. WIll be trying another attempt
        > either wed or friday.
        >
        > Matt
        >
        > --- In hameltech@yahoogroups.com, "demondoppel" <mattihorn@i...>
        > wrote:
        > >
        > > New cement cone built, since the others are losing there narrow
        > tops.
        > > I am using a cement which gives twice the strength and I put a
        rod
        > up
        > > the center.
        > >
        > > Bottom cone to be welded, magnets on middle, small pending.
        > >
        > > Christmas time :)
        > > Matt
        > >
        > >
        > > --- In hameltech@yahoogroups.com, "demondoppel" <mattihorn@i...>
        > > wrote:
        > > >
        > > >
        > > >
        > > > 11, 6.8 and 4.2 diameter cones are going to be used now.
        > > > The 11 inch cone which was made, was off in one dimension
        during
        > > > fabrication, so another one will have to be made.
        > > >
        > > > Other than that, I suppose that there will be smooth sailing
        > ahead.
        > > >
        > > > 300 more circular magnets bought to ease in the construction.
        > > >
        > > > No fancy tuning rings (my idea, or an extended idea which was
        > > overkill).
        > > > Just 3 magnetic rings for keeping the cones. The top two will
        be
        > > next to
        > > > each other vertically, while the bottom will be separated by
        > just
        > > about
        > > > an inch or so.
        > > >
        > > > Magnets on the osc table in repulsion, which will overcome the
        > > weight of
        > > > the bottom cone's downward thrust.
        > > >
        > > > Matt
        > > >
        > >
        >
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.