- You know what I like is if you really want to discuss the spacetime

matrix, then we have to talk about our perception of physical reality in

relation to the Heisenberg inter-determinacy formula. Heisenberg

developed what he called "probability packets," vector quantities based

on the Planck Constant:

p1q1 - q2p2 = h / (2 pi i)

q � generalized coordinate

p � momentum

h � Planck Constant (6.547 X 10-27 erg-seconds)

pi � 3.14... etc.

i � sqr(-1)

The quantity "p" or the momentum in this formula according to tensor

concepts (1.Any muscle that stretches or tenses some part of the body

2.Math-an abstract object representing a generalization of the vector

concepts and having a specified system of components that undergo certain

types of transformation under changes of the coordinate system.) is equal

to the velocity of the propagation of nerve impulses which is around 60

feet/second. If we change this velocity, we change the amplification of

the brain, and hence, the brain's range of detection and its scope of

action.

The Planck Constant is a quantum value, but it is a a value which could

vary in an infinitely overlapping series. New activity in our brains may

be that of an infinitely overlapping group of Fourier functions in which

the nerve impulses play the part of dynamic variables.

Therefore, the quantity "h" in the formula can change value at a constant

rate from one time frame to another; it is the difference which keeps the

frames separated from each other. Therefore, individuals can be

determined by the electron activity in the brains with behavior

particular to that of sentient creatures. (Imagine I.D. and detection

according to the quantum signature of one's thoughts).

Dirac, Heisenberg and their colleagues demonstrated for lack of better

phrasing that electrons behave like "thought."

Neils Bohr postulated a "Wave Atom;" this atom has a psychology of its

own - (a study useful in the behavior of mobs, riots and guerrilla war

tactics). The "wave atom" electronic psychology is mirrored in human

behavior. In addition, schizoid behavior may be a splitting of the

personality into tensor and non-tensor groups - another useful quantum

signature.

That's my two cents.

Sincerely,

\ /

@@

<

VVVV

schizoid man (aka Randolph)

>

> From: "Tony Bermanseder" <PACIFICAP@h...>

> Date: Wed Jan 5, 2005 9:27 am

> Subject: Re: The 'virtual' gauge photon as background

> matrix of spacetime

>

>

> ADVERTISEMENT

>

>

>

> Dear Forum!

>

>

> Please allow me to elucidate the formulation about the

> Heisenberg

> Finestructure of the previous post.

> This is very important and should allow many of you to

> reevaluate

> your various attempts to unify physics and refine your

> searches for

> prospective TOE's.

>

> Now you all can do this, provided you are aware of the

> Planck-Length

> formula and the electromagnetic finestructure constant.

>

> It has long been proposed, that metric theories, such as

> General

> Relativity break down at the Planck-Scale.

> Length might behave like time and charges might behave

> like mass and

> other such association of dimensionless quantities in a

> 'quantum

> foam'.

>

> Einstein's lifelong search to unify gravitation with

> electromagnetism

> revolved around the assimilation of Maxwell's equations

> with those

> of General Relativity - he did not incorporate the

> nuclear force

> interactions or an ubiquitous application of the Planck

> Scale.

>

> There are two equivalent ways to find the necessary

> unification

> between electromagnetism and gravitation; they both

> involve the

> ForceCharges, that is the proportionality constants in

> the Coulomb

> law (as 1/4pi.epsilon0) and Newtonian gravitation (G).

>

> Applying the modular dualities of the superbrane models;

> the inversed

> scale of say winded superstrings is physically

> equivalent to the

> linear mode of vibratory superstring; allows one to set

> two

> identities.

>

> 1) hc/(sourcewavelength)=Inversed Energy

> (sourcequantum)=1/e* (say),

> and

> 2) G/4pi.epsilon0=1.

>

> 1) leads to the de Broglie formulations for matter waves

> and 2)

> unitises the proportionality constants of electric

> permittivity and

> gravitation.

>

> This leads to the same formulation as starting from the

> Planck-Scale

> as follows.

>

> Consider the Planck-Length as the minimum condition for

> any metric

> spacetime background.

>

> Now allow this Planck-Length to oscillate, that is

> contract and

> rebounce in a form of random/probability fluctuation.

>

> Apply Richard Feynman's preferred form of matter-light

> interaction,

> that is the electromagnetic finestructure constant as

> Sqrt(Alpha),

> where Alpha=2pi.e^2/(4pi.epsilon0.hc).

>

> The Planck-Length is: L(Planck)=Sqrt(hG/2pi.c^3).

>

> DEFINE the Planck-Length-Oscillation as:

> L(Planck).Sqrt(Alpha)=L*.

>

> What do you get in multiplying this out?

>

> You get: L*=[e/c^2].Sqrt(G/4pi.epsilon0),

>

> Now comes the trick; the dimensionality below the

> Planck-Scale is

> UNDEFINED a priori, but can be REDEFINED in the

> Planck-Length-

> Oscillation.

>

> Suppose there is variation (associated with the missing

> mass) in G,

> just as Paul Dirac proposed and that there exists a

> bounding G=Go at

> the beginning of the cosmogenesis.

> Set this initial Go as the inverse of the

> Coulomb-Constant to unify

> the forcecharges and hence REDEFINE L*=[e/c^2](unified).

>

> This also unifies gravitation with electromagnmetism in

> a prePlanck

> physical quantity denoted as Inverse Energy above (as

> magnetocharge

> e* say).

>

> In particular 1/e* as 1/Energy Units MUST become the

> StarCoulomb

> (C*), defined in units of Volume/Time Squared or the

> quantifier

> C*=m^3/s^2.

>

> But Coulomb Charge e relates to this via the Identity

> engaging the

> Electronic Diameter(Re from Thomson scattering)

> (2Re).c^2 = e* which

> becomes mapped as the atomic scale of quantum mechanics

> onto the

> prePlanck-Scale as L*.c^2.

>

> Those definitions now lead directly to the Heisenberg

> Finestructure,

> defining Planck's Constant h as a form of the wormhole

> radius (which

> is the sourcewavelength of the heterotic superstring

> HE(8x8) in

> magnification to the Ng VanDam limit).

>

> We recall: h/4pi = sourcewavelength/(8pi.Re.c^3).

> (Equation #)

>

> But we have just shown that:

> L(Planck).Sqrt(Alpha)=[e/c^2].Unity.

>

> Hence hc/sourcewavelength=1/e* with the mapping e*<->e

> between the

> classical/quantum and prePlanck scales.

> Setting e*(unified)=sourcewavelength.c^2 as the

> Planck-Length-

> Oscillation, then gives the required dimensionality

> unification:

>

> hc.c^2/e* = 1/e* = h.c^3/e* for h->1/c^3 as Equation #.

>

> This derivation should clarify the matter of dimensional

> consistency

> in the previous post.

> Sincerly Tony B. Sirebard

> - --- In hameltech@yahoogroups.com, freeenergy@j... wrote:
> You know what I like is if you really want to discuss the spacetime

reality in

> matrix, then we have to talk about our perception of physical

> relation to the Heisenberg inter-determinacy formula. Heisenberg

based

> developed what he called "probability packets," vector quantities

> on the Planck Constant:

tensor

>

> p1q1 - q2p2 = h / (2 pi i)

>

> q » generalized coordinate

> p » momentum

> h » Planck Constant (6.547 X 10-27 erg-seconds)

> pi » 3.14... etc.

> i » sqr(-1)

>

> The quantity "p" or the momentum in this formula according to

> concepts (1.Any muscle that stretches or tenses some part of the

body

> 2.Math-an abstract object representing a generalization of the

vector

> concepts and having a specified system of components that undergo

certain

> types of transformation under changes of the coordinate system.)

is equal

> to the velocity of the propagation of nerve impulses which is

around 60

> feet/second. If we change this velocity, we change the

amplification of

> the brain, and hence, the brain's range of detection and its scope

of

> action.

could

>

> The Planck Constant is a quantum value, but it is a a value which

> vary in an infinitely overlapping series. New activity in our

brains may

> be that of an infinitely overlapping group of Fourier functions in

which

> the nerve impulses play the part of dynamic variables.

constant

>

> Therefore, the quantity "h" in the formula can change value at a

> rate from one time frame to another; it is the difference which

keeps the

> frames separated from each other. Therefore, individuals can be

detection

> determined by the electron activity in the brains with behavior

> particular to that of sentient creatures. (Imagine I.D. and

> according to the quantum signature of one's thoughts).

better

>

> Dirac, Heisenberg and their colleagues demonstrated for lack of

> phrasing that electrons behave like "thought."

its

>

> Neils Bohr postulated a "Wave Atom;" this atom has a psychology of

> own - (a study useful in the behavior of mobs, riots and guerrilla

war

> tactics). The "wave atom" electronic psychology is mirrored in

human

> behavior. In addition, schizoid behavior may be a splitting of the

quantum

> personality into tensor and non-tensor groups - another useful

> signature.

Dear Randolph!

>

> That's my two cents.

>

> Sincerely,

>

> \ /

> @@

> <

> VVVV

>

> schizoid man (aka Randolph)

>

>

Thank you for your reply.

You are rather on the mark with your ideas; following Heisenberg,

Dirac and Bohr; about the 'thought/wave' connections regarding the

elementary particles.

You know, I haven't mentioned the actualmanifestation of the unitary

dimensionalies of the derivations as given below.

The StarCoulomb C* has units m^3/s^2; now what does this remind you

of?

Its a Volume acted upon by the quantum operator df/dt.

So you have a quasi-angular acceleration as the timeratechange of

frequency acting upon a spacequantum.

And the operator df/dt has been defined as AWARENESS, eventually

leading to a physical definition of consciousness.

Being linked to the atomic scalings, this also implies that the

basic unit of any such 'consciousness' must be defined in the most

elementary material building block - namely the Hydrogen Atom.

So the consequence is, that a single Hydrogen Atom and anything

buolt upon it, must possess universal consciousness, defined in its

awareness.

Where does this awareness, expressed as df/dt derive from?

Well I have posted this file on algorithmic gravity on this siteand

shall send you a copy for your perusal.

But it has to do with a pentagonal supersymmetry mentioned in

another post on this site.

Thank you for your discourse Randolph! Tony B. Sirebard

>

background

> >

> > From: "Tony Bermanseder" <PACIFICAP@h...>

> > Date: Wed Jan 5, 2005 9:27 am

> > Subject: Re: The 'virtual' gauge photon as

> > matrix of spacetime

the

> >

> >

> > ADVERTISEMENT

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear Forum!

> >

> >

> > Please allow me to elucidate the formulation about

> > Heisenberg

to

> > Finestructure of the previous post.

> > This is very important and should allow many of you

> > reevaluate

your

> > your various attempts to unify physics and refine

> > searches for

the

> > prospective TOE's.

> >

> > Now you all can do this, provided you are aware of

> > Planck-Length

constant.

> > formula and the electromagnetic finestructure

> >

such as

> > It has long been proposed, that metric theories,

> > General

behave

> > Relativity break down at the Planck-Scale.

> > Length might behave like time and charges might

> > like mass and

in a

> > other such association of dimensionless quantities

> > 'quantum

equations

> > foam'.

> >

> > Einstein's lifelong search to unify gravitation with

> > electromagnetism

> > revolved around the assimilation of Maxwell's

> > with those

Planck

> > of General Relativity - he did not incorporate the

> > nuclear force

> > interactions or an ubiquitous application of the

> > Scale.

in

> >

> > There are two equivalent ways to find the necessary

> > unification

> > between electromagnetism and gravitation; they both

> > involve the

> > ForceCharges, that is the proportionality constants

> > the Coulomb

(G).

> > law (as 1/4pi.epsilon0) and Newtonian gravitation

> >

models;

> > Applying the modular dualities of the superbrane

> > the inversed

set

> > scale of say winded superstrings is physically

> > equivalent to the

> > linear mode of vibratory superstring; allows one to

> > two

waves

> > identities.

> >

> > 1) hc/(sourcewavelength)=Inversed Energy

> > (sourcequantum)=1/e* (say),

> > and

> > 2) G/4pi.epsilon0=1.

> >

> > 1) leads to the de Broglie formulations for matter

> > and 2)

the

> > unitises the proportionality constants of electric

> > permittivity and

> > gravitation.

> >

> > This leads to the same formulation as starting from

> > Planck-Scale

for

> > as follows.

> >

> > Consider the Planck-Length as the minimum condition

> > any metric

light

> > spacetime background.

> >

> > Now allow this Planck-Length to oscillate, that is

> > contract and

> > rebounce in a form of random/probability fluctuation.

> >

> > Apply Richard Feynman's preferred form of matter-

> > interaction,

as

> > that is the electromagnetic finestructure constant

> > Sqrt(Alpha),

missing

> > where Alpha=2pi.e^2/(4pi.epsilon0.hc).

> >

> > The Planck-Length is: L(Planck)=Sqrt(hG/2pi.c^3).

> >

> > DEFINE the Planck-Length-Oscillation as:

> > L(Planck).Sqrt(Alpha)=L*.

> >

> > What do you get in multiplying this out?

> >

> > You get: L*=[e/c^2].Sqrt(G/4pi.epsilon0),

> >

> > Now comes the trick; the dimensionality below the

> > Planck-Scale is

> > UNDEFINED a priori, but can be REDEFINED in the

> > Planck-Length-

> > Oscillation.

> >

> > Suppose there is variation (associated with the

> > mass) in G,

(unified).

> > just as Paul Dirac proposed and that there exists a

> > bounding G=Go at

> > the beginning of the cosmogenesis.

> > Set this initial Go as the inverse of the

> > Coulomb-Constant to unify

> > the forcecharges and hence REDEFINE L*=[e/c^2]

> >

in

> > This also unifies gravitation with electromagnmetism

> > a prePlanck

(as

> > physical quantity denoted as Inverse Energy above

> > magnetocharge

Identity

> > e* say).

> >

> > In particular 1/e* as 1/Energy Units MUST become the

> > StarCoulomb

> > (C*), defined in units of Volume/Time Squared or the

> > quantifier

> > C*=m^3/s^2.

> >

> > But Coulomb Charge e relates to this via the

> > engaging the

mechanics

> > Electronic Diameter(Re from Thomson scattering)

> > (2Re).c^2 = e* which

> > becomes mapped as the atomic scale of quantum

> > onto the

Heisenberg

> > prePlanck-Scale as L*.c^2.

> >

> > Those definitions now lead directly to the

> > Finestructure,

wormhole

> > defining Planck's Constant h as a form of the

> > radius (which

#.

> > is the sourcewavelength of the heterotic superstring

> > HE(8x8) in

> > magnification to the Ng VanDam limit).

> >

> > We recall: h/4pi = sourcewavelength/(8pi.Re.c^3).

> > (Equation #)

> >

> > But we have just shown that:

> > L(Planck).Sqrt(Alpha)=[e/c^2].Unity.

> >

> > Hence hc/sourcewavelength=1/e* with the mapping e*<-

>e

> > between the

> > classical/quantum and prePlanck scales.

> > Setting e*(unified)=sourcewavelength.c^2 as the

> > Planck-Length-

> > Oscillation, then gives the required dimensionality

> > unification:

> >

> > hc.c^2/e* = 1/e* = h.c^3/e* for h->1/c^3 as Equation

> >

dimensional

> > This derivation should clarify the matter of

> > consistency

> > in the previous post.

> > Sincerly Tony B. Sirebard

> >