Re: [hackers-il] Rate of failure of Israeli software projects?
- Resistance to using 'make'? why because it was hard to use or because
they did not realize the potential and the need for such a tool?
Omer Zak wrote:
>On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 18:00 +1000, amos@... wrote:
>>On 8/23/05, Omer Zak <omerz.at.actcom.co.il@...> wrote:
>>>Now, that we have discussed criteria and clarified them a bit, can we
>>>turn to the main subject - that of cultural influences on Israeli
>>>project managers, which cause their projects to fail.
>>Where do you expect to find such data? I'd look it up in publications of
>>companies like Deloyt-Tusch(sp) and maybe the IDC, if it's available for
>>the public at all...
>Lacking access to such publications, and knowing that the publications
>do not capture informal anecdotes, I threw the question to the
>Hackers-IL mailing list to see whether some subscribers have anything to
>>>Are there such adverse cultural influences (the way there are in USA,
>>>for example)? Are there any countries, in which project managers
>>>consistently excel, thanks to the beneficial influence of their national
>>I don't know. I can only tell from my personal experience - the most well
>>managed software development organization I've ever seen is completly
>>run by Israelis (plus a russian-born R&D manager). Don't know how to
>>extrapolate from this or my other experience on the rest of the industry,
>>some are better and some are worse in any country.
>What can you tell us about the average case - the average software
>development organization in Israel (or at least among those which you
>My own experience (which may be obsolete by now) is that I personally am
>more aggressive than the average organization in developing or deploying
>tools to assist them in the work.
>(I remember an organization, for which I worked several years ago, in
>which there was resistance to using 'make' and it was broken down only
>after they added another employee in the role of 100% software
> --- Omer
- On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 13:11 +0300, Ori Idan wrote:
> Resistance to using 'make'? why because it was hard to use or becauseThey were used to typing in the commands to build and link the modules
> they did not realize the potential and the need for such a tool?
and were set in their ways.
The software in question was simple, though (about 3-4 modules per
Delay is the deadliest form of denial. C. Northcote Parkinson
My own blog is at http://www.livejournal.com/users/tddpirate/
My opinions, as expressed in this E-mail message, are mine alone.
They do not represent the official policy of any organization with which
I may be affiliated in any way.
WARNING TO SPAMMERS: at http://www.zak.co.il/spamwarning.html
- On 8/23/05, Omer Zak <omerz.at.actcom.co.il@...> wrote:
> What can you tell us about the average case - the average softwareAt least the ones I took part in delivered their goals and as far as I can
> development organization in Israel (or at least among those which you
tell they have done so within the allocated resources (time, manpower,
badget). There were a couple of exceptions I am aware of:
1. The "Big Project" at Comverse to move the entire platform from an
ancient real-time 386 OS + PL/I + C etc to Windows NT + C++ failed,
possibly due to mis-management and unfamiliarity with the technology
and maybe also unfamiliarity with the development process they tried to
(I haven't stayed there to watch the failure, I was just fed-up with
Windows NT and moved on to other projects which involved
2. During a one-year stint at Sun I was mostly responsible to help Amdocs
convert from HP to Solaris. Their way of working is to use lots of zombie-level
programmers who understand pretty much nothing at what they are doing
and just keep throwing more and more people at late projects. It works,
eventually, but at a much higher cost for the customer than he bargained for.
(who's apparently a captive by the time this happens).
You get to see wierd things in Amdocs (e.g. in parallel to the project I was
helping with, I slowly discovered three other projects to do the same (convert
their HP code to Solaris).
I don't know if this is considered "failure" since Amdocs generally succeed in
winning and retaining contracts but still their line of work is very distressing
just to be reminded about.
My refference: a few years of sub-contracting for various projects in Comverse,
and a few years of working for software startups. With side-kicks for the
army and others.