Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Re: The non-virtual RMS

Expand Messages
  • Shlomi Fish
    ... LOL. Of course, the free software definition is more restrictive than the debian free software guidelines. But sorry for suspecting you of using the word
    Message 1 of 12 , Jan 3, 2003
    • 0 Attachment
      On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Arik Baratz wrote:

      > Shlomi Fish wrote:
      >
      > > Pardon my nit-picking, but what do you mean by "non-virtual"? If you refer
      > > to the "non-on-line" ("lo mekuvan" in Hebrew) than it is not the same
      > > thing as non-virtual. A virtual RMS is someone who is not really RMS, but
      > > behaves or should be treated the same way. I pointed the difference
      > > between virtual and on-line or digital here:
      > >
      > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hackers-il/message/1810
      > >
      > My subject was to be understood by Debian users only. For the rest of
      > us, take a look at http://packages.debian.org/unstable/admin/vrms.html
      >

      LOL.

      Of course, the free software definition is more restrictive than the
      debian free software guidelines.

      But sorry for suspecting you of using the word virtual in an improper
      context. I, unfortunately, am not a Debian user.

      Regards,

      Shlomi Fish

      There is a virtual IGLU Cabal!

      > -- Arik
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
      > hackers-il-unsubscribe@egroups.com
      >
      >
      >
      > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
      >
      >



      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      Shlomi Fish shlomif@...
      Home Page: http://t2.technion.ac.il/~shlomif/
      Home E-mail: shlomif@...

      "Let's suppose you have a table with 2^n cups..."
      "Wait a second - is n a natural number?"
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.