Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

What's causing Gulf War illness?

Expand Messages
  • DSBR
    What s causing Gulf War illness? TRAVIS DUNN WASHINGTON (November 6, 2002) - Disaster News Network Research into the causes of unexplained Gulf War illnesses
    Message 1 of 1 , Nov 6, 2002
      What's causing Gulf War illness?
      WASHINGTON (November 6, 2002) — Disaster News Network

      Research into the causes of unexplained Gulf War illnesses
      will get $20 million in FY 2004, the Department of Veterans
      Affairs announced on Oct. 28. 

      That's twice the funding such research has received from the federal
      government in any previous year.

      In addition, the theory that Gulf War illnesses have a neurological basis, and may have been caused by chemical exposure, will receive considerable attention, in part because of a spate of new studies published over the past year.
      "Clearly, the past decade has not covered the VA in glory," said VA
      Deputy Secretary Leo S. Mackay, in an Oct. 28 address to the Research
      Advisory Committee (RAC) on Gulf War Illnesses. "However, since taking
      office last year, this Administration -- under Secretary Principi's leadership --
      has begun to change that...there is increasing objective evidence that a major
      category of Gulf War illnesses is neurological in character. Some of you have
      been stating that for some time, and I applaud your persistence."
      "...[T]he VA intends to send a message to researchers," Mackay said.
      "We want to underscore the fact that research into Gulf War illnesses is
      an area ripe for important discoveries. That there is honor in this work.
      Not only to improve the health of veterans of the Gulf War, but to protect
      American troops and civilians in the future. And that there is money to
      support new hypotheses. We want the best researchers and the best
      ideas brought to bear on this longstanding problem."
      The announcement follows publication of a new British study, funded
      by the Department of Defense, which discredits the theory that most
      unexplained Gulf War illnesses are psychosomatic, or the result of post-
      traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
      The study, published in the Sept. 14 issue of the British Medical Journal,
      found that psychological factors alone could not explain all the symptoms
      experienced by afflicted Gulf War veterans.
      "Whatever the nature of ill health in Gulf veterans, it was not explained
      by events or exposures conventionally understood to be psychologically
      traumatic," concluded the study.
      To date, the federal government has spent more than $213 million on
      224 different research projects on Gulf War illnesses with a wide range
      of symptoms including chronic fatigue, sleeping problems, irritability,
      bouts of dizziness, memory loss, chronic pain and concentration problems.
      A June RAC report estimates 25-30 percent of Gulf War veterans suffered
      from unexplained illnesses. That's between 175,000 and 210,000 of the
      roughly 700,000 veterans who served in that war.
      Some hail the recent announcement as a major shift in government policy.
      Steve Robinson, executive director of the National Gulf War Resource
      Center, a veterans' advocacy group, said he was stunned.
      Robinson also serves on RAC, the group Mackay addressed last week.
      Another member of that committee, Dr. Robert Haley, called Mackay's
      announcement "big news."
      Not, he said, because of the increase in research funding, but because
      of a major change in policy and attitude at the VA regarding Gulf War
      The big change, Haley said, is in focus -- from combat stress and PTSD
      to a neurological basis for the symptoms.
      "[VA Secretary] Principi is on a roll here," Haley said. "This is a major
      sea change at the VA. For eight years we've run into bureaucrats who
      tried to stop us every step of the way."
      Robinson also praises Principi, as well as Mackay, for leadership in
      the research initiative, but he had nothing but contempt for the
      bureaucrats in the VA and the DoD, who Robinson thinks have been
      trying to cover up the true nature of Gulf War illnesses for more than
      a decade.
      "The department [of defense] lied for almost seven years" about the
      presence of biological and chemical agents in Iraq during the Persian
      Gulf War, Robinson said.
      It wasn't that long ago, he said, that those who demanded investigating
      neurological causes were "ridiculed and demonized."
      Dr. Vinh Cam has also been advocating intense research into neurological
      causes for years.
      Cam served from 1998-2001 on the Presidential Advisory Commission
      on Gulf War Veterans' Illnesses established by President Clinton.
      But Cam's opinions were generally disregarded by the Commission, she
      said. And when she pressed for more research into neurotoxicity,
      immunotoxicity, genetic polymorphism and the synergistic effects of
      various pesticides and chemicals as possible causes, Cam said she
      was pressured by other members of the commission, including Chairman
      Warren Rudman, "to go along with the overall tone" of the report, which
      focused on stress research, she said.
      Cam, a researcher herself, had done work for Rockefeller University on
      Lou Gehrig's disease and multiple sclerosis, maladies that have symptoms
      similar to those Gulf War veterans were experiencing. Her scientific
      opinion: neither combat stress nor PTSD were the right areas to look
      for answers.
      "I'm glad that they're finally doing something in that area," Cam said. "I
      had pointed out that they should look beyond stress."
      Dr. Haley, while a member of the VA research committee, is also an
      epidemiologist at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
      in Dallas, and he has personally conducted pioneering research into the
      neurological causes.
      The studies he has conducted, he said, have found brain damage in
      afflicted veterans, "almost certainly from sarin nerve gas," he said.
      He said, however, that the "cocktail theory" is also plausible -- that is,
      that a combination of nerve gas, nerve gas antidote tablets as well as
      over-exposure to pesticides and DEET-based insecticides could have
      "a synergistic effect" which resulted in the Gulf War illnesses. But the
      stress theory, he said, doesn't explain anything.
      Using magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Haley and his colleagues
      have determined that test subjects had lost brain cells in their brain
      stems and basal ganglia. Brain damage in the brain stem can cause
      problems with attention and balance; damage in the basal ganglia can
      cause depression, concentration difficulties and otherwise inexplicable
      pain. All of these have been reported as symptoms of Gulf War illnesses.
      Part of the $20 million pledged by the VA for new studies will "create
      a Center of Excellence in medical imaging," Mackay said in his Oct.
      28 address. This decision, Haley said, is also indicative of the new
      seriousness the VA is showing the neurological research.
      Haley's studies, however, were not funded by the federal government.
      They were funded by H. Ross Perot.
      "Thank goodness for Ross Perot," Haley said. If not for Perot, Haley
      thinks Gulf War illnesses would have been written off as "stress-
      related" back in 1995.
      "[The federal government] channeled all the research to the psychological
      theories," Haley said. "They were clearly orchestrating all this so no
      research would go down that road [neurological research]."
      "Don't get me wrong. I am one to resist conspiracy theories," Haley said.
      He sees no diabolical plot here, only "a very cynical comedy of errors."
      He believes certain elements of the DoD and VA thought, "We're never
      going to be able to solve this, so let's just make it go away."
      "It's bureaucracy," Haley said.
      DoD spokesperson Barbara Goodno called Haley's work "preliminary"
      since it dealt with only a small group of veterans. Therefore, she said,
      the area "requires further study."
      "The effort to build on those studies is underway," Goodno said. "There
      is a great deal to be learned from this work. Not only for veterans but
      for society at large," she said.
      But that's how these studies work, Haley said. It takes a series of such
      small studies to build up a convincing body of evidence. Some of them
      have already been done.
      Two other research teams -- led by Dr. Han Kang in Washington and
      Dr. Michael Weiner in San Francisco -- replicated his findings. Both
      Kang and Weiner are funded by the VA.
      "In science," Haley said, "the name of the game is replication." Goodno
      said the DoD is supportive of the new turn that research is taking.
      "The Department of Defense supports all actions focused on achieving
      a better understanding of the illnesses of Gulf War veterans," she said.
      "To that end, DoD has been involved in a collaborative effort with the
      departments of Veterans Affairs and Health and Human Services since
      1994. The investigative effort has not been restricted; in fact, the changing
      nature of the studies reflect an effort to build on the findings of earlier
      research, scientific breakthroughs and improved technologies."
      Other veterans' groups, think that the recent VA announcement doesn't
      go far enough.
      Kirt Love, director of the Desert Storm Battle Registry, is also a Gulf
      War veteran afflicted by an unexplained illness he attributes to his
      tour of duty in the war.
      Love thinks the area of research specified by last week's VA announcement
      is too limited, and that RAC is still understaffed and underfinanced.
      Love advocates the creation of a database of tissue samples from Gulf
      War veterans, as well as a comprehensive reporting system in order to
      get as many veterans as possible in research programs.
      "They can recommend all the research in the world," he said, "but if they
      can't get people in the door, nothing's going to happen."
      Love is also bothered by the "the high attrition rate" of anyone involved
      in Gulf War illness issues, whether they are committee members or
      employees of the DoD or VA.
      According to Love, most of these people, such as Dr. Cam, last only
      a few years at their posts. This means that new people keep coming
      to the issue with little experience. (Dr. Cam said she tried to gain
      membership on RAC, after her term on the presidential commission
      lapsed. She was passed over.)
      Love is also bothered that afflicted veterans like himself are kept at the
      fringes of the discussion.
      "I'm living the whole thing," Love said. "It's not easy -- it's a nightmare."
      The DoD, he is convinced, does not want research to make any real
      "They want it to fail," he said, "so they can wrap it up."
      Love is most worried, however, that no significant lessons have been
      learned from what happened in the first Gulf War, as the U.S. is poised
      to enter another war in the same region.
      "We going to be repeating the same mistakes with Gulf War II," he said.
      Posted November 6, 2002 4:05 PM
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.