Re: [GTh] A question about Logion 114.
- [I wrote]:
> Why not just lop 10 years off the end of group 1 and the beginning of[Judy wrote]:
> group 2?
> Because her groups of accretions are not primarily about *dating*, butI understand that, but where is the specific support for the claim that
> *content*. She says that one group of accretions are put there in
> to a particular set of circumstances which were prevalent within a certain
> date range and that the other group of accretions were put there in
> to another set of circumstances that were prevalent in another,
> date range.
sets of circumstances were prevalent in the given time-frames?