Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [GTh] A question about Logion 114.

Expand Messages
  • Michael Grondin
    ... I understand that, but where is the specific support for the claim that these sets of circumstances were prevalent in the given time-frames? Mike
    Message 1 of 8 , Apr 14, 2008
    • 0 Attachment
      [I wrote]:
      > Why not just lop 10 years off the end of group 1 and the beginning of
      > group 2?

      [Judy wrote]:
      > Because her groups of accretions are not primarily about *dating*, but
      > about
      > *content*. She says that one group of accretions are put there in
      > response
      > to a particular set of circumstances which were prevalent within a certain
      > date range and that the other group of accretions were put there in
      > response
      > to another set of circumstances that were prevalent in another,
      > overlapping
      > date range.

      I understand that, but where is the specific support for the claim that
      these
      sets of circumstances were prevalent in the given time-frames?

      Mike
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.