Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Ee: [GTh] Recovering Thomas

Expand Messages
  • sarban
    From: Michael Grondin To: gthomas@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 8:06 PM Subject: Re: [GTh] Recovering Thomas ... Hi Mike DeConick in several
    Message 1 of 1 , Jul 24, 2006
    • 0 Attachment
      From: Michael Grondin
      To: gthomas@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 8:06 PM
      Subject: Re: [GTh] Recovering Thomas

      >This list agrees in almost all particulars with her earlier paper ("The
      >Original _Gospel of Thomas_"), with some uncertainty due to the use of
      >lower-case letters in her paper (some of which are easily translatable into
      >the standard numbering, some not.) It is confusing, however, that _all_ the
      >parts of 62, 63, 65, and 96 are shown in parens. Is this your doing or hers?
      >Since #62, e.g., contains only two parts, why doesn't it appear as simply
      >'62' instead of '62(1-2)'? But I notice this also in her paper, where 33 and
      >47 are split into parts, but every part is labelled 'kernel', so one wonders
      >why she bothered to split it. (?)




      Hi Mike

      DeConick in several places in her list on pps 97-98 distinguishes parts of the kernel adjacent within the same saying ie she says 24(2),24(3) and 62(1),62(2) and 63(1-3),63(4) and 65(1-7),65(8) and 96(1-2),96(3) .

      I simplified this format.

      Andrew Criddle




      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.