Mathean Redaction in Thomas
- Andrew says:
References to destruction are frequent in Matthew the absence here
suggests that Matthew was not using a source containing 'destroyed'.
Because destroyed is at least implied here, by the act of up-rooting, could this be a matter of scribal error or omission, because destroyed is implied by the act itself?
Platter Flats, OK
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]