Re: [GTh] Crosstalk Discussions
- Hi Bill,
This is a hectic week for we preacher folk, but just a quick reply to this
>May you now thaw:)!
>>Good to hear from you! So you survived the winter freeze:)!
>And it was a BAD winter this year, for any number of reasons.
>I do hope I can read hers and yours at some point. Could you possibly snail
>>work available online? Can you easily send me your "rigorous work?"
>The answer to both questions is, probably not. I am not aware of April's
>article being on-line, nor my own. I know that sometime within the last
>couple years, someone had wanted to post my HTR piece on their website, so I
>wrote to HTR about the copyright, and never got a response. I forget who
>wanted to do this, and don't know whether they went ahead with it anyway. I
mail your piece?
>>To another matter, I'd like to hear your thoughts about the date and sitzWe agree on the former, but the latter interests me. I'd sometimes like to
>>early Thomas. Do you conceive it, like you conceive Q1, "very early" (as
>>from you "Jesus and the Village Scribes" work)?
>Well, since I'm no longer convinced I was right, it's hard to say. But yes,
>my inclination was to regard the foundational layer as quite early. And I am
>STILL inclined to date the complete Thomas, i.e., Thomas as we more or less
>have it, as very early -- i.e., 40s to 60s or thereabouts. I have yet to be
>convinced by any of the arguments placing Thomas late-ish.
hear your thoughts about the sitz you see that led to that later layer(s) so
early. When I look at what I consider to be the earliest layer, that social
praxis looks to be changing in saying 6 and then saying 14:1-2 looks to be
taking this in yet a new way. That latter redaction of the earliest layer
fits nicely into the second century, but it fascinates me that you want to
place such so early. When you have time and I have some time to talk this
out, I'd like to do so.
Good to hear from you.
- Hey Gordon, and everyone:
>I do hope I can read hers and yours at some point. Could you possiblyI could, but it might be quicker to find a local university library that
>mail your piece?
carries HTR. If you want, though, I'll mail it to you -- e-mail me off list
with you mailing address. And please, no requests from others! I'd run out
of time, and postage, pretty quickly.
>We agree on the former, but the latter interests me. I'd sometimes like toSocial praxis can change overnight, or in a year or two. It doesn't require
>hear your thoughts about the sitz you see that led to that later layer(s)
>early. When I look at what I consider to be the earliest layer, that social
>praxis looks to be changing in saying 6 and then saying 14:1-2 looks to be
>taking this in yet a new way.
decades. Paul's coail praxis changes from letter to letter. If we used the
same techniques used to date Thomas to date Paul's letters, we'd end up
dating letters like 1 Cor and Philippians to the second century, I suspect.
>When you have time and I have some time to talk thisSounds good. It's the end of term for me, so I don't have any more time at
>out, I'd like to do so.
the moment to develop this stuff than you do. Later, then.
University of Regina
Add photos to your messages with MSN Premium. Get 2 months FREE*
- In a message dated 04/06/2004 09:40:17 PM, warnal@... writes:
> ... Thomas to date Paul's letters, we'd end up dating lettersI think that many are overly cautious of Thomas because they still ascribe
> like 1 Cor and Philippians to the second century, I suspect.
to the theory that there is Guilt by association.
That is, because it was found in the Nag Hummadi that it must then be late
As noted this is a false Premise.
I would also note that Davies has suggested a pre existent Jewish Gnostic
like Genre emerging in the first century.
If this were so?
The Jewish revolt in the 60s may have caused the dissolution and
scattering of the proponents of this Genre and Belief system.
Failing the initial movement This would then be taken up" after the
Revolt" by the emerging Christian Church.
That is it may be understandable that such would disappear, For a time
only to emerge later..
It might very well be expected.
Springfield, Tenn 37172
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]